Loading…
Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation
•3D whole-heart MRA provides TAVI relevant aortic root measurements without contrast media administration.•Self-navigated MRA enables TAVI measurements with shortened scan time and substantial larger volume coverage compared to navigator-gated MRA.•Valve prothesis sizing based on self-navigated MRA...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of radiology 2021-04, Vol.137, p.109573-109573, Article 109573 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23 |
container_end_page | 109573 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109573 |
container_title | European journal of radiology |
container_volume | 137 |
creator | Pamminger, Mathias Kranewitter, Christof Kremser, Christian Reindl, Martin Reinstadler, Sebastian J. Henninger, Benjamin Reiter, Gert Piccini, Davide Tiller, Christina Holzknecht, Magdalena Lechner, Ivan Bauer, Axel Klug, Gert Metzler, Bernhard Mayr, Agnes |
description | •3D whole-heart MRA provides TAVI relevant aortic root measurements without contrast media administration.•Self-navigated MRA enables TAVI measurements with shortened scan time and substantial larger volume coverage compared to navigator-gated MRA.•Valve prothesis sizing based on self-navigated MRA is equivalent to standardized computed tomography angiography.
To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI).
Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics.
Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1–2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109573 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2489263568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0720048X2100053X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2489263568</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhCZCQl2wyHNuJnSxYoJZLpaJKLUjsLI99Qj1K7MF2IvEIfWsyZMqS1dH59Z3rT8hrBlsGTL7bb3GfjNty4GxRukaJJ2TDWsUrpbh6SjagOFRQtz_OyIuc9wDQ1B1_Ts6EaFQLHWzIwx0OfRXM7H-ago7OmPKU6UmIqVplcUm_3l7RjL8mDBZpHxMNMVQY7s2SO2piKt7SFGOhI5o8JRwxFOoDLcmEbE25x4LpEZzNMCP142EwoZjiY3hJnvVmyPjqFM_J908fv118qa5vPl9dfLiurGi6UqlaOWV3rAaBTnamFrxpG1kDopB9I5niuw56xiQKpxpwvbQt5yARgHU9F-fk7dr3kOJyTS569NnisCyCccqa123HpWhku6BiRW2KOSfs9SH50aTfmoE-eqD3-q8H-uiBXj1Yqt6cBky7Ed2_msenL8D7FcDlzNlj0tn641udT2iLdtH_d8AfYjOaZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2489263568</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Pamminger, Mathias ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Kremser, Christian ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Reiter, Gert ; Piccini, Davide ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Lechner, Ivan ; Bauer, Axel ; Klug, Gert ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</creator><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Kremser, Christian ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Reiter, Gert ; Piccini, Davide ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Lechner, Ivan ; Bauer, Axel ; Klug, Gert ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><description>•3D whole-heart MRA provides TAVI relevant aortic root measurements without contrast media administration.•Self-navigated MRA enables TAVI measurements with shortened scan time and substantial larger volume coverage compared to navigator-gated MRA.•Valve prothesis sizing based on self-navigated MRA is equivalent to standardized computed tomography angiography.
To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI).
Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics.
Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1–2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ = 1). However, in four patients (15 %) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA.
Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0720-048X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7727</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109573</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33578090</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve - surgery ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Computed Tomography Angiography ; Computed tomography angiography (CTA) ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Angiography ; Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging ; Male ; Reproducibility of Results ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ; Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)</subject><ispartof>European journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.137, p.109573-109573, Article 109573</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33578090$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranewitter, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henninger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><title>Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation</title><title>European journal of radiology</title><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><description>•3D whole-heart MRA provides TAVI relevant aortic root measurements without contrast media administration.•Self-navigated MRA enables TAVI measurements with shortened scan time and substantial larger volume coverage compared to navigator-gated MRA.•Valve prothesis sizing based on self-navigated MRA is equivalent to standardized computed tomography angiography.
To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI).
Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics.
Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1–2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ = 1). However, in four patients (15 %) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA.
Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve - surgery</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography angiography (CTA)</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</subject><subject>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)</subject><issn>0720-048X</issn><issn>1872-7727</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EokPhCZCQl2wyHNuJnSxYoJZLpaJKLUjsLI99Qj1K7MF2IvEIfWsyZMqS1dH59Z3rT8hrBlsGTL7bb3GfjNty4GxRukaJJ2TDWsUrpbh6SjagOFRQtz_OyIuc9wDQ1B1_Ts6EaFQLHWzIwx0OfRXM7H-ago7OmPKU6UmIqVplcUm_3l7RjL8mDBZpHxMNMVQY7s2SO2piKt7SFGOhI5o8JRwxFOoDLcmEbE25x4LpEZzNMCP142EwoZjiY3hJnvVmyPjqFM_J908fv118qa5vPl9dfLiurGi6UqlaOWV3rAaBTnamFrxpG1kDopB9I5niuw56xiQKpxpwvbQt5yARgHU9F-fk7dr3kOJyTS569NnisCyCccqa123HpWhku6BiRW2KOSfs9SH50aTfmoE-eqD3-q8H-uiBXj1Yqt6cBky7Ed2_msenL8D7FcDlzNlj0tn641udT2iLdtH_d8AfYjOaZg</recordid><startdate>202104</startdate><enddate>202104</enddate><creator>Pamminger, Mathias</creator><creator>Kranewitter, Christof</creator><creator>Kremser, Christian</creator><creator>Reindl, Martin</creator><creator>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creator><creator>Henninger, Benjamin</creator><creator>Reiter, Gert</creator><creator>Piccini, Davide</creator><creator>Tiller, Christina</creator><creator>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creator><creator>Lechner, Ivan</creator><creator>Bauer, Axel</creator><creator>Klug, Gert</creator><creator>Metzler, Bernhard</creator><creator>Mayr, Agnes</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202104</creationdate><title>Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation</title><author>Pamminger, Mathias ; Kranewitter, Christof ; Kremser, Christian ; Reindl, Martin ; Reinstadler, Sebastian J. ; Henninger, Benjamin ; Reiter, Gert ; Piccini, Davide ; Tiller, Christina ; Holzknecht, Magdalena ; Lechner, Ivan ; Bauer, Axel ; Klug, Gert ; Metzler, Bernhard ; Mayr, Agnes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve - surgery</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography angiography (CTA)</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Angiography</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement</topic><topic>Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pamminger, Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kranewitter, Christof</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kremser, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reindl, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henninger, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reiter, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piccini, Davide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiller, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzknecht, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bauer, Axel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klug, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metzler, Bernhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Agnes</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pamminger, Mathias</au><au>Kranewitter, Christof</au><au>Kremser, Christian</au><au>Reindl, Martin</au><au>Reinstadler, Sebastian J.</au><au>Henninger, Benjamin</au><au>Reiter, Gert</au><au>Piccini, Davide</au><au>Tiller, Christina</au><au>Holzknecht, Magdalena</au><au>Lechner, Ivan</au><au>Bauer, Axel</au><au>Klug, Gert</au><au>Metzler, Bernhard</au><au>Mayr, Agnes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation</atitle><jtitle>European journal of radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Radiol</addtitle><date>2021-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>137</volume><spage>109573</spage><epage>109573</epage><pages>109573-109573</pages><artnum>109573</artnum><issn>0720-048X</issn><eissn>1872-7727</eissn><abstract>•3D whole-heart MRA provides TAVI relevant aortic root measurements without contrast media administration.•Self-navigated MRA enables TAVI measurements with shortened scan time and substantial larger volume coverage compared to navigator-gated MRA.•Valve prothesis sizing based on self-navigated MRA is equivalent to standardized computed tomography angiography.
To prospectively compare image-quality, reliability and graft sizing of a prototype self-navigated and a navigator-gated non-contrast three dimensional (3D) whole-heart magnetic-resonance-angiography (MRA) sequence with computed-tomography-angiography (CTA) for planning transcatheter-aortic-valve-implantation (TAVI).
Self- and navigator-gated 1.5 T MRA were performed in 27 patients (aged 83 ± 5 years, 41 % male) for aortic root sizing and coronary ostia height measurements; 15 (56 %) patients underwent additional CTA. Subjective-image quality was graded on a 4-point Likert scale, objective MRA image-quality was assessed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Continuous MRA and CTA measurements were analyzed with regression and Bland-Altman analysis, valve sizing by kappa statistics.
Median image-quality as rated by two observers was 1.5 [interquartile range (IQR) 1–3] for self-navigated MRA and 1 [IQR 1–2] for navigator-gated MRA (p = 0.059). SNR and CNR were comparable between MRA sequences (p = 0.471 and 0.445, respectively). Acquisition time was shorter for self-navigated MRA compared to navigator-gated MRA (5.5 ± 1 min vs, 6.5 ± 2 min, p = 0.029). Inter-observer correlation of aortic root measurements was high to very high for both self- and navigator-gated MRA (r = 0.75 to 0.94 and r = 0.85 to 0.96, respectively, all p < 0.0001). Theoretical prosthetic valve sizing of self-navigated MRA and CTA was equivalent (κ = 1). However, in four patients (15 %) one coronary ostium each (right coronary artery 3, left main artery 1) was not clearly definable on self-navigated MRA.
Self-navigated MRA enables aortic annulus TAVI measurements without significant difference to navigator-gated MRA at shortened acquisition time. Prosthesis sizing by self-navigated MRA measurements is equivalent to navigator-gated MRA and CTA-based choice.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>33578090</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109573</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0720-048X |
ispartof | European journal of radiology, 2021-04, Vol.137, p.109573-109573, Article 109573 |
issn | 0720-048X 1872-7727 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2489263568 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024 |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aortic Valve - diagnostic imaging Aortic Valve - surgery Aortic Valve Stenosis - diagnostic imaging Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Computed Tomography Angiography Computed tomography angiography (CTA) Female Humans Magnetic Resonance Angiography Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) Magnetic Resonance Imaging Male Reproducibility of Results Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) |
title | Self-navigated versus navigator-gated 3D MRI sequence for non-enhanced aortic root measurement in transcatheter aortic valve implantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T14%3A22%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-navigated%20versus%20navigator-gated%203D%20MRI%20sequence%20for%20non-enhanced%20aortic%20root%20measurement%20in%20transcatheter%20aortic%20valve%20implantation&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20radiology&rft.au=Pamminger,%20Mathias&rft.date=2021-04&rft.volume=137&rft.spage=109573&rft.epage=109573&rft.pages=109573-109573&rft.artnum=109573&rft.issn=0720-048X&rft.eissn=1872-7727&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109573&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2489263568%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-747d7cb1403ed69a432585640ee36f56172b90f116e3d750df6c82206e0019f23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2489263568&rft_id=info:pmid/33578090&rfr_iscdi=true |