Could patterns of animal behaviour cause the observed differences in soil carbon between adjacent irrigated and unirrigated pastures?

• Published in: The Science of the total environment 2021-06, Vol.772, p.145033-145033, Article 145033
• Main Authors: Liáng, Lìyǐn L., Kirschbaum, Miko U.F., Giltrap, Donna L., Hunt, John E., Laubach, Johannes
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Behavior, Animal; Biomass; Carbon - analysis; Carbon transfer; Cattle; CenW; Grazed pastures; Irrigation; Modelling; New Zealand; SOC stocks; Soil
• ISSN: 0048-9697; 1879-1026
• DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145033

Previous soil sampling from grazed pastures in New Zealand compared the changes of soil organic carbon (SOC) in adjacent irrigated and unirrigated portions of the same paddocks. It showed that irrigated portions had lower SOC stocks than unirrigated portions, with an average difference of 7.0 tC ha−1 or 0.6 tC ha−1 yr−1. These findings have formed the basis of an assessment for the net effect of conversion of New Zealand's grazed pastures to irrigation. However, since cattle could move freely between irrigated and unirrigated portions of the studied paddocks, there could have been different grazing intensities and/or excreta transfer between the irrigated and unirrigated portions of the same paddocks. Both these factors could have affected SOC stocks. In this study, we used the process-based model, CenW, to simulate the consequences of this possible carbon transfer via animal excreta and different grazing intensities. We found that the observed increase of 0.6 tC ha−1 yr−1 in SOC stock in the unirrigated portions could result from a transfer of 20% excreta from the irrigated to unirrigated portions (with an area ratio of 6:1) of a paddock and with the unirrigated portions being grazed only lightly with 2.0 tDM ha−1 in foliage biomass residuals remaining after grazing. That means that the observed higher SOC stocks in the unirrigated portions could potentially be attributable to the behaviour of grazing animals. We suggest that a realistic extent of carbon transfer and/or differences in grazing intensities could be sufficient to account for the observed differences in SOC stocks even if irrigation per se caused no differences in carbon stocks. It is therefore inappropriate to ascribe the change of SOC to irrigation effects based on experimental findings where SOC changes can be affected by the behaviour of grazing animals. [Display omitted] •Grazing behaviour may cause SOC difference between irrigated and unirrigated pasture.•Excreta transfer could account for the observed difference in SOC.•Difference in grazing intensity could attribute to the observed difference in SOC.•Difference in SOC from soil core measurements should be interpreted with caution.