Loading…

Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism

Rationale Depressed individuals demonstrate debilitating symptoms, including depressed mood, anhedonia, and effort-related deficits. Effort-related decision-making can be measured through providing subjects with a choice between high effort/reward and low effort/reward options, which is a dopamine (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopharmacology 2021-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1609-1619
Main Authors: Errante, Emily L., Chakkalamuri, Marilyn, Akinbo, Oreoluwa I., Yohn, Samantha E., Salamone, John D., Matuszewich, Leslie
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3
container_end_page 1619
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1609
container_title Psychopharmacology
container_volume 238
creator Errante, Emily L.
Chakkalamuri, Marilyn
Akinbo, Oreoluwa I.
Yohn, Samantha E.
Salamone, John D.
Matuszewich, Leslie
description Rationale Depressed individuals demonstrate debilitating symptoms, including depressed mood, anhedonia, and effort-related deficits. Effort-related decision-making can be measured through providing subjects with a choice between high effort/reward and low effort/reward options, which is a dopamine (DA)–dependent behavior. While previous research has shown sex differences in depression rates, this has not been examined within operant-based effort-related decision-making tasks nor has DA been shown to underlie this behavior in female rats. Objectives The current study investigated sex differences in an effort-related decision-making task prior to and following administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (HAL). Methods Adult rats were food restricted or fed freely and trained in an effort-related progressive ratio choice task. After stable responding, HAL was administered acutely (0.05–0.2 mg/kg) prior to testing. Results Results indicate a significant effect of sex on training variables, with males having a greater number of lever presses, higher ratios, and longer active lever times. Pretreatment with HAL significantly reduced the same measures in both sexes for the high-valued reward, while increasing chow consumption in the food restricted males. Food restricted rats showed a greater number of total lever presses and achieved higher ratios; however, the effect in male food restricted rats was greatest. Conclusions These data suggest that, although there are sex differences in training, HAL decreases behavior across sexes, demonstrating that the D2 mechanism is similar in both sexes. These findings provide a better understanding of motivational dysfunction in both sexes and potential treatment targets for depression.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00213-021-05795-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490123981</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A662612995</galeid><sourcerecordid>A662612995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1rVDEUhoModqz-ARcScOMmbT7vTdyV1o9CwYW6cRMyycmQem8yJndg_PemTrVYijlwAifP-3LCi9BLRk8YpeNpo5QzQXojVI1Gkf0jtGJScMLpyB-jFaVCEMGUPkLPWrum_Ugtn6IjIZShgrEV-vYZ9jikGKFC9tBwyhhiLHUhFSa3QMABfGqpZDK77ylv3uJaJsAl4lC2bk4Z8AXHFTxsl1Kxy4vblJza_Bw9iW5q8OL2PkZf37_7cv6RXH36cHl-dkW8lHwhKkgZRiPHkWmQeuAiGCGV1yyYoLhwSkJ0ZnBulCC9MH5tNA9U6LjWhnpxjN4cfLe1_NhBW-ycmodpchnKrlkuDWVcGM06-voeel12NfftLFeC8oGzUd5RGzeBTTmWpTp_Y2rPhoEPjBujOnXyANUrwJx8yRBTn_8j4AeBr6W1CtFua5pd_WkZtTeB2kOgtjf7O1C776JXtxvv1jOEv5I_CXZAHIDWn_IG6t2X_mP7C3e2qPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2530262174</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism</title><source>Springer Link</source><source>SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><creator>Errante, Emily L. ; Chakkalamuri, Marilyn ; Akinbo, Oreoluwa I. ; Yohn, Samantha E. ; Salamone, John D. ; Matuszewich, Leslie</creator><creatorcontrib>Errante, Emily L. ; Chakkalamuri, Marilyn ; Akinbo, Oreoluwa I. ; Yohn, Samantha E. ; Salamone, John D. ; Matuszewich, Leslie</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale Depressed individuals demonstrate debilitating symptoms, including depressed mood, anhedonia, and effort-related deficits. Effort-related decision-making can be measured through providing subjects with a choice between high effort/reward and low effort/reward options, which is a dopamine (DA)–dependent behavior. While previous research has shown sex differences in depression rates, this has not been examined within operant-based effort-related decision-making tasks nor has DA been shown to underlie this behavior in female rats. Objectives The current study investigated sex differences in an effort-related decision-making task prior to and following administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (HAL). Methods Adult rats were food restricted or fed freely and trained in an effort-related progressive ratio choice task. After stable responding, HAL was administered acutely (0.05–0.2 mg/kg) prior to testing. Results Results indicate a significant effect of sex on training variables, with males having a greater number of lever presses, higher ratios, and longer active lever times. Pretreatment with HAL significantly reduced the same measures in both sexes for the high-valued reward, while increasing chow consumption in the food restricted males. Food restricted rats showed a greater number of total lever presses and achieved higher ratios; however, the effect in male food restricted rats was greatest. Conclusions These data suggest that, although there are sex differences in training, HAL decreases behavior across sexes, demonstrating that the D2 mechanism is similar in both sexes. These findings provide a better understanding of motivational dysfunction in both sexes and potential treatment targets for depression.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2072</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00213-021-05795-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33590311</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biomedicine ; Decision making ; Depression, Mental ; Dietary restrictions ; Dopamine ; Dopamine D2 receptors ; Dopamine receptors ; Drug therapy ; Food ; Food consumption ; Gender differences ; Haloperidol ; Hedonic response ; Influence ; Males ; Mental depression ; Mental task performance ; Mood ; Neurosciences ; Operant conditioning ; Original Investigation ; Pharmacology/Toxicology ; Psychiatry ; Psychological aspects ; Reinforcement ; Sex ; Sex differences ; Sex differences (Psychology) ; Sexes ; Testing</subject><ispartof>Psychopharmacology, 2021-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1609-1619</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33590311$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Errante, Emily L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakkalamuri, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinbo, Oreoluwa I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohn, Samantha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salamone, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matuszewich, Leslie</creatorcontrib><title>Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism</title><title>Psychopharmacology</title><addtitle>Psychopharmacology</addtitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><description>Rationale Depressed individuals demonstrate debilitating symptoms, including depressed mood, anhedonia, and effort-related deficits. Effort-related decision-making can be measured through providing subjects with a choice between high effort/reward and low effort/reward options, which is a dopamine (DA)–dependent behavior. While previous research has shown sex differences in depression rates, this has not been examined within operant-based effort-related decision-making tasks nor has DA been shown to underlie this behavior in female rats. Objectives The current study investigated sex differences in an effort-related decision-making task prior to and following administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (HAL). Methods Adult rats were food restricted or fed freely and trained in an effort-related progressive ratio choice task. After stable responding, HAL was administered acutely (0.05–0.2 mg/kg) prior to testing. Results Results indicate a significant effect of sex on training variables, with males having a greater number of lever presses, higher ratios, and longer active lever times. Pretreatment with HAL significantly reduced the same measures in both sexes for the high-valued reward, while increasing chow consumption in the food restricted males. Food restricted rats showed a greater number of total lever presses and achieved higher ratios; however, the effect in male food restricted rats was greatest. Conclusions These data suggest that, although there are sex differences in training, HAL decreases behavior across sexes, demonstrating that the D2 mechanism is similar in both sexes. These findings provide a better understanding of motivational dysfunction in both sexes and potential treatment targets for depression.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biomedicine</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Depression, Mental</subject><subject>Dietary restrictions</subject><subject>Dopamine</subject><subject>Dopamine D2 receptors</subject><subject>Dopamine receptors</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food consumption</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Haloperidol</subject><subject>Hedonic response</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mental task performance</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Operant conditioning</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Pharmacology/Toxicology</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Reinforcement</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sex differences</subject><subject>Sex differences (Psychology)</subject><subject>Sexes</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>0033-3158</issn><issn>1432-2072</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1rVDEUhoModqz-ARcScOMmbT7vTdyV1o9CwYW6cRMyycmQem8yJndg_PemTrVYijlwAifP-3LCi9BLRk8YpeNpo5QzQXojVI1Gkf0jtGJScMLpyB-jFaVCEMGUPkLPWrum_Ugtn6IjIZShgrEV-vYZ9jikGKFC9tBwyhhiLHUhFSa3QMABfGqpZDK77ylv3uJaJsAl4lC2bk4Z8AXHFTxsl1Kxy4vblJza_Bw9iW5q8OL2PkZf37_7cv6RXH36cHl-dkW8lHwhKkgZRiPHkWmQeuAiGCGV1yyYoLhwSkJ0ZnBulCC9MH5tNA9U6LjWhnpxjN4cfLe1_NhBW-ycmodpchnKrlkuDWVcGM06-voeel12NfftLFeC8oGzUd5RGzeBTTmWpTp_Y2rPhoEPjBujOnXyANUrwJx8yRBTn_8j4AeBr6W1CtFua5pd_WkZtTeB2kOgtjf7O1C776JXtxvv1jOEv5I_CXZAHIDWn_IG6t2X_mP7C3e2qPw</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Errante, Emily L.</creator><creator>Chakkalamuri, Marilyn</creator><creator>Akinbo, Oreoluwa I.</creator><creator>Yohn, Samantha E.</creator><creator>Salamone, John D.</creator><creator>Matuszewich, Leslie</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism</title><author>Errante, Emily L. ; Chakkalamuri, Marilyn ; Akinbo, Oreoluwa I. ; Yohn, Samantha E. ; Salamone, John D. ; Matuszewich, Leslie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biomedicine</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Depression, Mental</topic><topic>Dietary restrictions</topic><topic>Dopamine</topic><topic>Dopamine D2 receptors</topic><topic>Dopamine receptors</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food consumption</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Haloperidol</topic><topic>Hedonic response</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mental task performance</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Operant conditioning</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Pharmacology/Toxicology</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Reinforcement</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sex differences</topic><topic>Sex differences (Psychology)</topic><topic>Sexes</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Errante, Emily L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chakkalamuri, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akinbo, Oreoluwa I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yohn, Samantha E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salamone, John D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matuszewich, Leslie</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Errante, Emily L.</au><au>Chakkalamuri, Marilyn</au><au>Akinbo, Oreoluwa I.</au><au>Yohn, Samantha E.</au><au>Salamone, John D.</au><au>Matuszewich, Leslie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism</atitle><jtitle>Psychopharmacology</jtitle><stitle>Psychopharmacology</stitle><addtitle>Psychopharmacology (Berl)</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1609</spage><epage>1619</epage><pages>1609-1619</pages><issn>0033-3158</issn><eissn>1432-2072</eissn><abstract>Rationale Depressed individuals demonstrate debilitating symptoms, including depressed mood, anhedonia, and effort-related deficits. Effort-related decision-making can be measured through providing subjects with a choice between high effort/reward and low effort/reward options, which is a dopamine (DA)–dependent behavior. While previous research has shown sex differences in depression rates, this has not been examined within operant-based effort-related decision-making tasks nor has DA been shown to underlie this behavior in female rats. Objectives The current study investigated sex differences in an effort-related decision-making task prior to and following administration of the DA D2 receptor antagonist haloperidol (HAL). Methods Adult rats were food restricted or fed freely and trained in an effort-related progressive ratio choice task. After stable responding, HAL was administered acutely (0.05–0.2 mg/kg) prior to testing. Results Results indicate a significant effect of sex on training variables, with males having a greater number of lever presses, higher ratios, and longer active lever times. Pretreatment with HAL significantly reduced the same measures in both sexes for the high-valued reward, while increasing chow consumption in the food restricted males. Food restricted rats showed a greater number of total lever presses and achieved higher ratios; however, the effect in male food restricted rats was greatest. Conclusions These data suggest that, although there are sex differences in training, HAL decreases behavior across sexes, demonstrating that the D2 mechanism is similar in both sexes. These findings provide a better understanding of motivational dysfunction in both sexes and potential treatment targets for depression.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33590311</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00213-021-05795-x</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-3158
ispartof Psychopharmacology, 2021-06, Vol.238 (6), p.1609-1619
issn 0033-3158
1432-2072
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2490123981
source Springer Link; SPORTDiscus with Full Text
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Biomedicine
Decision making
Depression, Mental
Dietary restrictions
Dopamine
Dopamine D2 receptors
Dopamine receptors
Drug therapy
Food
Food consumption
Gender differences
Haloperidol
Hedonic response
Influence
Males
Mental depression
Mental task performance
Mood
Neurosciences
Operant conditioning
Original Investigation
Pharmacology/Toxicology
Psychiatry
Psychological aspects
Reinforcement
Sex
Sex differences
Sex differences (Psychology)
Sexes
Testing
title Sex differences in effort-related decision-making: role of dopamine D2 receptor antagonism
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sex%20differences%20in%20effort-related%20decision-making:%20role%20of%20dopamine%20D2%20receptor%20antagonism&rft.jtitle=Psychopharmacology&rft.au=Errante,%20Emily%20L.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1609&rft.epage=1619&rft.pages=1609-1619&rft.issn=0033-3158&rft.eissn=1432-2072&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00213-021-05795-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA662612995%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-5d44d7947718e48623d9345c81d9d523a54efa96aa74e4c39cb982d038fb890c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2530262174&rft_id=info:pmid/33590311&rft_galeid=A662612995&rfr_iscdi=true