Loading…

Comparing Two Different Modes of Task Practice during Lower Limb Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in People with Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is used for the rehabilitation of motor function after stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lower limb CIMT that uses number of repetition of tasks with the one that uses number of hours of practice. The study was a randomized clinica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neural plasticity 2021, Vol.2021, p.6664058-6664058
Main Authors: Abdullahi, Auwal, Aliyu, Naima Umar, Useh, Ushotanefe, Abba, Muhammad Aliyu, Akindele, Mukadas Oyeniran, Truijen, Steven, Saeys, Wim
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) is used for the rehabilitation of motor function after stroke. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of lower limb CIMT that uses number of repetition of tasks with the one that uses number of hours of practice. The study was a randomized clinical trial approved by the Ethics Committee of Kano State Ministry of Health. Fifty-eight people with stroke participated in the study. Groups 1 and 2 performed daily 600 repetitions and 3 hours of task practice, respectively, 5 times weekly for 4 weeks. Motor impairment (primary outcome), balance, functional mobility, knee extensor spasticity, walking speed and endurance, and exertion before and after commencement of activities were assessed at baseline and postintervention. The data was analyzed using Friedmann and Mann-Whitney tests. The results showed that there was only significant difference ( < 0.05) in knee extensor spasticity (group 1 (median = 0(0), mean rank = 27.50); group 2 (median = 0(0), mean rank = 31.64)), exertion before commencement of activities (group 1 (median = 0(0.5), mean rank = 21.90); group 2 (median = 1(0.5), mean rank = 37.64)), and exertion after commencement of activities (group 1 (median = 1(1), mean rank = 20.07); group 2 (median = 1(0), mean rank = 39.61) postintervention in favour of the experimental group (group 1)). The group 1 protocol is more effective at improving outcomes after stroke.
ISSN:1687-5443
DOI:10.1155/2021/6664058