Loading…
Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results
Purpose To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia. Methods In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between −...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2021-08, Vol.259 (8), p.2431-2440 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3 |
| container_end_page | 2440 |
| container_issue | 8 |
| container_start_page | 2431 |
| container_title | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 259 |
| creator | Aruma, Aruma Li, Meiyan Choi, Joanne Miao, Huamao Wei, Ruoyan Yang, Danjuan Yao, Peijun Sun, Ling Wang, Xiaoying Zhou, Xingtao |
| description | Purpose
To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between − 3.00 and − 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.
Results
No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were − 0.13 ± 0.07 and − 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and − 0.10 ± 0.07 and − 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (
P
= 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (
P
= 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.
Conclusions
Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497102984</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2497102984</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AgAS9eopWvScebLOoKC1502VtIZ6qll6QzJmlwTv51M86q4MFThaqn3hQ8hDzj8IoDmNcVQHHDQAADZQfB1AOy4UpqZkDcPiQbMIKzQYrbM3Je6x10Xmr-mJxJud1yuVUb8uNmrquPNK8t5ISV-qlhoTX5GOm8hLnOeaERlzaHNSLF76340I5Nv-zonPbRL82PfRRyjD715U5XeqMCnXKhKe-w-IY0HfJ-9m8oZwf0hRasa2z1CXk0-Vjx6X29IF_ev_t8ecWuP334ePn2mgVpdGMcpTcDDNMIo7TK6v4WeoIQRmFhAKOD3Nkt2AkBRiGED14Ko7mZ7GQsygvy8pS7L_nbirW5NNeA_eIF81qdUNZwEHZQHX3xD3qX17L065zQ2moFQppOiRMVSq614OT2ZU6-HBwHd9TjTnpc1-N-6XHH6Of30euYcPdn5bePDsgTUPto-Yrl79__if0JOQibbg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559540237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Aruma, Aruma ; Li, Meiyan ; Choi, Joanne ; Miao, Huamao ; Wei, Ruoyan ; Yang, Danjuan ; Yao, Peijun ; Sun, Ling ; Wang, Xiaoying ; Zhou, Xingtao</creator><creatorcontrib>Aruma, Aruma ; Li, Meiyan ; Choi, Joanne ; Miao, Huamao ; Wei, Ruoyan ; Yang, Danjuan ; Yao, Peijun ; Sun, Ling ; Wang, Xiaoying ; Zhou, Xingtao</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between − 3.00 and − 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.
Results
No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were − 0.13 ± 0.07 and − 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and − 0.10 ± 0.07 and − 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (
P
= 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (
P
= 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.
Conclusions
Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0721-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-702X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33661364</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Eye ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Myopia ; Ophthalmology ; Patients ; Refractive Surgery ; Vision</subject><ispartof>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2021-08, Vol.259 (8), p.2431-2440</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3465-1579</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33661364$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aruma, Aruma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Meiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Huamao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ruoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Danjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Peijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xingtao</creatorcontrib><title>Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results</title><title>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between − 3.00 and − 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.
Results
No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were − 0.13 ± 0.07 and − 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and − 0.10 ± 0.07 and − 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (
P
= 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (
P
= 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.
Conclusions
Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.</description><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Myopia</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Refractive Surgery</subject><subject>Vision</subject><issn>0721-832X</issn><issn>1435-702X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7uzqH_AgAS9eopWvScebLOoKC1502VtIZ6qll6QzJmlwTv51M86q4MFThaqn3hQ8hDzj8IoDmNcVQHHDQAADZQfB1AOy4UpqZkDcPiQbMIKzQYrbM3Je6x10Xmr-mJxJud1yuVUb8uNmrquPNK8t5ISV-qlhoTX5GOm8hLnOeaERlzaHNSLF76340I5Nv-zonPbRL82PfRRyjD715U5XeqMCnXKhKe-w-IY0HfJ-9m8oZwf0hRasa2z1CXk0-Vjx6X29IF_ev_t8ecWuP334ePn2mgVpdGMcpTcDDNMIo7TK6v4WeoIQRmFhAKOD3Nkt2AkBRiGED14Ko7mZ7GQsygvy8pS7L_nbirW5NNeA_eIF81qdUNZwEHZQHX3xD3qX17L065zQ2moFQppOiRMVSq614OT2ZU6-HBwHd9TjTnpc1-N-6XHH6Of30euYcPdn5bePDsgTUPto-Yrl79__if0JOQibbg</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Aruma, Aruma</creator><creator>Li, Meiyan</creator><creator>Choi, Joanne</creator><creator>Miao, Huamao</creator><creator>Wei, Ruoyan</creator><creator>Yang, Danjuan</creator><creator>Yao, Peijun</creator><creator>Sun, Ling</creator><creator>Wang, Xiaoying</creator><creator>Zhou, Xingtao</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-1579</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results</title><author>Aruma, Aruma ; Li, Meiyan ; Choi, Joanne ; Miao, Huamao ; Wei, Ruoyan ; Yang, Danjuan ; Yao, Peijun ; Sun, Ling ; Wang, Xiaoying ; Zhou, Xingtao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Myopia</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Refractive Surgery</topic><topic>Vision</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aruma, Aruma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Meiyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miao, Huamao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wei, Ruoyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Danjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Peijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiaoying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xingtao</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical & Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aruma, Aruma</au><au>Li, Meiyan</au><au>Choi, Joanne</au><au>Miao, Huamao</au><au>Wei, Ruoyan</au><au>Yang, Danjuan</au><au>Yao, Peijun</au><au>Sun, Ling</au><au>Wang, Xiaoying</au><au>Zhou, Xingtao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results</atitle><jtitle>Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>259</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2431</spage><epage>2440</epage><pages>2431-2440</pages><issn>0721-832X</issn><eissn>1435-702X</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To compare 1-year visual outcomes after implantable collamer lens V4c (EVO-ICL) implantation and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for moderate myopia.
Methods
In this retrospective study, 67 eyes of 39 patients with a preoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent between − 3.00 and − 6.00 diopters (D) were selected from a database of SMILE and ICL implantation procedures performed from April 2018 to December 2018. Thirty-two eyes of 20 patients underwent EVO-ICL implantation, and 35 eyes of 19 patients underwent SMILE. At the routine 1-year follow-up appointment, all selected patients were examined for higher-order ocular aberrations, retinal image quality, and a quality of vision (QoV) questionnaire. This data was then analyzed.
Results
No complications were observed. Uncorrected and corrected visual acuities at 1 year after surgery were − 0.13 ± 0.07 and − 0.15 ± 0.06 logMAR in the SMILE group, and − 0.10 ± 0.07 and − 0.16 ± 0.05 logMAR in the ICL group. Twenty-nine eyes (90.6%) which underwent ICL implantation and 34 eyes (97.1%) which underwent SMILE were within ± 0.5 D of the attempted spherical equivalent (
P
= 0.49). Changes in coma after ICL were significantly less than after SMILE (
P
= 0.002). The leading complaints after ICL and SMILE were halos (84.4%) and blurred vision (65.7%), respectively.
Conclusions
Both SMILE and ICL implantation provided good safety, efficacy, and predictability in correcting moderate myopia. The subjective visual complaints consisted mainly of halos after ICL and starbursts and blurred vision after SMILE.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>33661364</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3465-1579</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0721-832X |
| ispartof | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology, 2021-08, Vol.259 (8), p.2431-2440 |
| issn | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2497102984 |
| source | Springer Nature |
| subjects | Eye Medicine Medicine & Public Health Myopia Ophthalmology Patients Refractive Surgery Vision |
| title | Visual outcomes after small incision lenticule extraction and implantable collamer lens V4c for moderate myopia: 1-year results |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A46%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20outcomes%20after%20small%20incision%20lenticule%20extraction%20and%20implantable%20collamer%20lens%20V4c%20for%20moderate%20myopia:%201-year%20results&rft.jtitle=Graefe's%20archive%20for%20clinical%20and%20experimental%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Aruma,%20Aruma&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=259&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2431&rft.epage=2440&rft.pages=2431-2440&rft.issn=0721-832X&rft.eissn=1435-702X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00417-020-04982-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2497102984%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-1e3a7808fb0b3949580825f0ccb2908075c3d9609fe00b222aca327517f9f79e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559540237&rft_id=info:pmid/33661364&rfr_iscdi=true |