Loading…

High microvascular resistance and reduced left atrial strain in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction: The micro-strain study

It is already known that high coronary microvascular resistance (Rμ) is linked to altered left ventricular stiffness and might be an early indicator of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Left atrial dysfunction, on the other hand, varies according to the grade of left ventricula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of cardiology 2021-06, Vol.333, p.21-28
Main Authors: Keulards, Daniëlle C.J., Bouwmeester, Sjoerd, de Vos, Annemiek M.J., Dekker, Lukas R.C., Pijls, Nico H.J., Houthuizen, Patrick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:It is already known that high coronary microvascular resistance (Rμ) is linked to altered left ventricular stiffness and might be an early indicator of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Left atrial dysfunction, on the other hand, varies according to the grade of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. This is the first study to use the latest development for invasive assessment of Rμ and to combine it with echocardiographic assessment of left atrial strain during reservoir phase (LASr) by speckle tracking in relation to left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. An invasive angiogram was performed in 97 patients because of suspected ANOCA. All patients underwent comprehensive echocardiography, yet image quality was poor in 15 patients leaving 82 patients to include in the final analysis. In order to compare Rμ with LASr values, patients were divided into 4 groups based upon normal values of Rμ as defined by Fournier et al. The mean LASr was plotted against the four resistance groups. The LASr was 48.6% in the lowest resistance group, and 40.1%, 36.3% and 30.1% in the low intermediate, high intermediate and high resistance group respectively. These differences were significant compared to the lowest resistance group (p 
ISSN:0167-5273
1874-1754
DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.055