Loading…
Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats
Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dor...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian veterinary journal 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373 |
container_end_page | 248 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 242 |
container_title | Australian veterinary journal |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Garcia‐Pertierra, S Meeson, RL Yeung, BCY Bedford, G Pead, MJ |
description | Objective
To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy.
Methods
Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats.
Results
Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm.
Conclusion and Relevance
A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/avj.13062 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501259635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501259635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNHDtklmk929Weo3BS_qdUnzISn7UZNdpTcfwWf0SYxu9SA4MAwDP_4z_BA6JHhMQk3Ey3JMAHO6hYYkZSTGGYFtNMQYsxgnFAZoz_slxpAyynbRACDFeYL5EJ2da2NrWz9FIvLC6Eg2zlnVuMiEbp2o_cfbuy2tkNHK1tGqFFJXum6jsEjR-n20Y0Tp9cFmjtDD5cX97Dqe313dzKbzWAIDGusMC05ByExDrnia5TwlqUkkMZpKwnNKQBElsMxMZlimqFZAKIACni4ghRE66XNXrnnutG-Lynqpy1LUuul8QRkmlOU8XBuh4z_osulcHb4LFDDGIcFZoE57SrrGe6dNsXK2Em5dEFx8aS2C1uJba2CPNondotLql_zxGIBJD7zaUq__Tyqmj7d95CfZ4X-L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535563408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy.
Methods
Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats.
Results
Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm.
Conclusion and Relevance
A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-0423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-0813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/avj.13062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33709406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone Nails - veterinary ; Bone Screws ; Cats ; Fluoroscopy ; Ilium ; Ilium - diagnostic imaging ; Ilium - surgery ; pelvis ; Radiography ; sacroiliac fracture‐luxation ; Sacrum ; safe corridor ; Skull ; trans‐iliac bolt ; trans‐iliac pin ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Australian veterinary journal, 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeson, RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, BCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedford, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><title>Australian veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><description>Objective
To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy.
Methods
Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats.
Results
Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm.
Conclusion and Relevance
A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Nails - veterinary</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Ilium</subject><subject>Ilium - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ilium - surgery</subject><subject>pelvis</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>sacroiliac fracture‐luxation</subject><subject>Sacrum</subject><subject>safe corridor</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>trans‐iliac bolt</subject><subject>trans‐iliac pin</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0005-0423</issn><issn>1751-0813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNHDtklmk929Weo3BS_qdUnzISn7UZNdpTcfwWf0SYxu9SA4MAwDP_4z_BA6JHhMQk3Ey3JMAHO6hYYkZSTGGYFtNMQYsxgnFAZoz_slxpAyynbRACDFeYL5EJ2da2NrWz9FIvLC6Eg2zlnVuMiEbp2o_cfbuy2tkNHK1tGqFFJXum6jsEjR-n20Y0Tp9cFmjtDD5cX97Dqe313dzKbzWAIDGusMC05ByExDrnia5TwlqUkkMZpKwnNKQBElsMxMZlimqFZAKIACni4ghRE66XNXrnnutG-Lynqpy1LUuul8QRkmlOU8XBuh4z_osulcHb4LFDDGIcFZoE57SrrGe6dNsXK2Em5dEFx8aS2C1uJba2CPNondotLql_zxGIBJD7zaUq__Tyqmj7d95CfZ4X-L</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creator><creator>Meeson, RL</creator><creator>Yeung, BCY</creator><creator>Bedford, G</creator><creator>Pead, MJ</creator><general>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><author>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Nails - veterinary</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Ilium</topic><topic>Ilium - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ilium - surgery</topic><topic>pelvis</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>sacroiliac fracture‐luxation</topic><topic>Sacrum</topic><topic>safe corridor</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>trans‐iliac bolt</topic><topic>trans‐iliac pin</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeson, RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, BCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedford, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</au><au>Meeson, RL</au><au>Yeung, BCY</au><au>Bedford, G</au><au>Pead, MJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</atitle><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>242-248</pages><issn>0005-0423</issn><eissn>1751-0813</eissn><abstract>Objective
To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy.
Methods
Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats.
Results
Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm.
Conclusion and Relevance
A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</pub><pmid>33709406</pmid><doi>10.1111/avj.13062</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0005-0423 |
ispartof | Australian veterinary journal, 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248 |
issn | 0005-0423 1751-0813 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501259635 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Animals Bone Nails - veterinary Bone Screws Cats Fluoroscopy Ilium Ilium - diagnostic imaging Ilium - surgery pelvis Radiography sacroiliac fracture‐luxation Sacrum safe corridor Skull trans‐iliac bolt trans‐iliac pin Vertebrae |
title | Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A50%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20a%20safe%20corridor%20for%20trans%E2%80%90iliac%20pin%20placement%20in%20cats&rft.jtitle=Australian%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Garcia%E2%80%90Pertierra,%20S&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=242-248&rft.issn=0005-0423&rft.eissn=1751-0813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/avj.13062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501259635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535563408&rft_id=info:pmid/33709406&rfr_iscdi=true |