Loading…

Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats

Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian veterinary journal 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248
Main Authors: Garcia‐Pertierra, S, Meeson, RL, Yeung, BCY, Bedford, G, Pead, MJ
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373
container_end_page 248
container_issue 6
container_start_page 242
container_title Australian veterinary journal
container_volume 99
creator Garcia‐Pertierra, S
Meeson, RL
Yeung, BCY
Bedford, G
Pead, MJ
description Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats. Results Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm. Conclusion and Relevance A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/avj.13062
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501259635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2501259635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNHDtklmk929Weo3BS_qdUnzISn7UZNdpTcfwWf0SYxu9SA4MAwDP_4z_BA6JHhMQk3Ey3JMAHO6hYYkZSTGGYFtNMQYsxgnFAZoz_slxpAyynbRACDFeYL5EJ2da2NrWz9FIvLC6Eg2zlnVuMiEbp2o_cfbuy2tkNHK1tGqFFJXum6jsEjR-n20Y0Tp9cFmjtDD5cX97Dqe313dzKbzWAIDGusMC05ByExDrnia5TwlqUkkMZpKwnNKQBElsMxMZlimqFZAKIACni4ghRE66XNXrnnutG-Lynqpy1LUuul8QRkmlOU8XBuh4z_osulcHb4LFDDGIcFZoE57SrrGe6dNsXK2Em5dEFx8aS2C1uJba2CPNondotLql_zxGIBJD7zaUq__Tyqmj7d95CfZ4X-L</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2535563408</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats. Results Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm. Conclusion and Relevance A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0005-0423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1751-0813</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/avj.13062</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33709406</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bone Nails - veterinary ; Bone Screws ; Cats ; Fluoroscopy ; Ilium ; Ilium - diagnostic imaging ; Ilium - surgery ; pelvis ; Radiography ; sacroiliac fracture‐luxation ; Sacrum ; safe corridor ; Skull ; trans‐iliac bolt ; trans‐iliac pin ; Vertebrae</subject><ispartof>Australian veterinary journal, 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2021 The Authors. Australian Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33709406$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeson, RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, BCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedford, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><title>Australian veterinary journal</title><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><description>Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats. Results Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm. Conclusion and Relevance A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bone Nails - veterinary</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Ilium</subject><subject>Ilium - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Ilium - surgery</subject><subject>pelvis</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>sacroiliac fracture‐luxation</subject><subject>Sacrum</subject><subject>safe corridor</subject><subject>Skull</subject><subject>trans‐iliac bolt</subject><subject>trans‐iliac pin</subject><subject>Vertebrae</subject><issn>0005-0423</issn><issn>1751-0813</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEQx4MotlYPvoAseNHDtklmk929Weo3BS_qdUnzISn7UZNdpTcfwWf0SYxu9SA4MAwDP_4z_BA6JHhMQk3Ey3JMAHO6hYYkZSTGGYFtNMQYsxgnFAZoz_slxpAyynbRACDFeYL5EJ2da2NrWz9FIvLC6Eg2zlnVuMiEbp2o_cfbuy2tkNHK1tGqFFJXum6jsEjR-n20Y0Tp9cFmjtDD5cX97Dqe313dzKbzWAIDGusMC05ByExDrnia5TwlqUkkMZpKwnNKQBElsMxMZlimqFZAKIACni4ghRE66XNXrnnutG-Lynqpy1LUuul8QRkmlOU8XBuh4z_osulcHb4LFDDGIcFZoE57SrrGe6dNsXK2Em5dEFx8aS2C1uJba2CPNondotLql_zxGIBJD7zaUq__Tyqmj7d95CfZ4X-L</recordid><startdate>202106</startdate><enddate>202106</enddate><creator>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creator><creator>Meeson, RL</creator><creator>Yeung, BCY</creator><creator>Bedford, G</creator><creator>Pead, MJ</creator><general>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202106</creationdate><title>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</title><author>Garcia‐Pertierra, S ; Meeson, RL ; Yeung, BCY ; Bedford, G ; Pead, MJ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bone Nails - veterinary</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Ilium</topic><topic>Ilium - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Ilium - surgery</topic><topic>pelvis</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>sacroiliac fracture‐luxation</topic><topic>Sacrum</topic><topic>safe corridor</topic><topic>Skull</topic><topic>trans‐iliac bolt</topic><topic>trans‐iliac pin</topic><topic>Vertebrae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meeson, RL</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeung, BCY</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedford, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pead, MJ</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia‐Pertierra, S</au><au>Meeson, RL</au><au>Yeung, BCY</au><au>Bedford, G</au><au>Pead, MJ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats</atitle><jtitle>Australian veterinary journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Vet J</addtitle><date>2021-06</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>99</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>242</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>242-248</pages><issn>0005-0423</issn><eissn>1751-0813</eissn><abstract>Objective To identify whether a theoretical predictable safe corridor is available in cats for placement of trans‐iliac pins without the use of fluoroscopy. Methods Twenty‐one cats with straight orthogonal normal pelvic radiographs were included. Two start points were evaluated: a midpoint and a dorsal point. The midpoint was defined as midway between the dorsal lamina of the sacral vertebral canal and the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The dorsal start point was 2 mm ventral to the cranial dorsal iliac spine. The pin was assumed to be driven at 90 degrees to the lateral face of the ilium, and considered surgeon accuracy was ±4 degrees from the perpendicular. The angular range and the distance between the iliac wings from the ventrodorsal radiograph were used to calculate the possible cross‐sectional area and pin exit location if driven from one iliac wing to the other. The corridor was then evaluated for repeatability in six randomly selected cats. Results Vertebral foramina penetration risk was identified in some cats when using a 1.6 and 2 mm‐diameter pin using the mid‐iliac wing start point. The dorsal start point decreased the available pin placement area but reduced the risk of entering the hazardous zone for all pin sizes up to 2 mm. Conclusion and Relevance A theoretical defined safe corridor is available for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats between 2.0 and 5.5 kg. A 1.2‐mm pin is the safest if using the mid‐iliac wing start point. A more dorsal start point can accommodate up to a 2.0‐mm pin if correctly aligned to the sacrum.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</pub><pmid>33709406</pmid><doi>10.1111/avj.13062</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0005-0423
ispartof Australian veterinary journal, 2021-06, Vol.99 (6), p.242-248
issn 0005-0423
1751-0813
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2501259635
source Wiley
subjects Animals
Bone Nails - veterinary
Bone Screws
Cats
Fluoroscopy
Ilium
Ilium - diagnostic imaging
Ilium - surgery
pelvis
Radiography
sacroiliac fracture‐luxation
Sacrum
safe corridor
Skull
trans‐iliac bolt
trans‐iliac pin
Vertebrae
title Defining a safe corridor for trans‐iliac pin placement in cats
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A50%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Defining%20a%20safe%20corridor%20for%20trans%E2%80%90iliac%20pin%20placement%20in%20cats&rft.jtitle=Australian%20veterinary%20journal&rft.au=Garcia%E2%80%90Pertierra,%20S&rft.date=2021-06&rft.volume=99&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=242&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=242-248&rft.issn=0005-0423&rft.eissn=1751-0813&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/avj.13062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2501259635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-e80a623ac8e39d67896717f4c1fe2c169213d1da0c8f8f58d2ed31233d367b373%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2535563408&rft_id=info:pmid/33709406&rfr_iscdi=true