Loading…
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability
We investigated the measurement error and repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using thin-slice imaging. Diffusion-weighted images of an ice-water phantom were acquired using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm thickness. ADC maps were generated at b = 0 and...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiological physics and technology 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.203-209 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23 |
container_end_page | 209 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 203 |
container_title | Radiological physics and technology |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Yoshida, Tsukasa Urikura, Atsushi Hosokawa, Yoichiro Shirata, Kensei Nakaya, Yoshihiro Endo, Masahiro |
description | We investigated the measurement error and repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using thin-slice imaging. Diffusion-weighted images of an ice-water phantom were acquired using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm thickness. ADC maps were generated at
b
= 0 and 1000 mm
2
/s using five consecutive scans. Measurement errors were assessed with accuracy and precision. Repeatability was assessed using the within-subject coefficient of variation. The ADC accuracy of both scanners agreed with the ADC of water at 0 °C. At 1-mm, precisions were 2.9% and 8.4% for the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The repeatabilities of 1-mm thickness were 1.3% and 3.4% in the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The 3.0-T scanner showed acceptable measurement errors and moderate repeatability compared with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance recommendation. A 3.0-T scanner can be used for reliable ADC measurement, even with a 1-mm thickness at a reasonable scan time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12194-021-00616-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502210947</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2544487116</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwAixQJDbdGDyOf27YVRUFpEps2rXl64xvXSVO8CRCfRjeFd_e0goWrDw6851jy4extyA-gBD2I4GETnEhgQthwHD1jB3DxmguWgXPH-e2PWKviG73kJTyJTtqWyu1tPKY_TqbZ18wL02fYlwpTbkJE8aYQtqrI3paC477uW7zrlluUuY0pIBPFv4T0-5mwb4Z_S7jkkJTkKbsc6VS1arxU-OJkOg-aop_JWMpU6HG5776ZvSL36YhLXev2YvoB8I3D-cJu774fHX-lV9-__Lt_OySB2X0wkPvbSe7DrywGDc2emH8VntvIHTagA4b6OwWq6KxFVHZAEaiR9CdEr1sT9jpIXcu048VaXFjooDD4DNOKzmphZQgOmUr-v4f9HZaS66vq5RSamMBTKXkgQplIioY3VzqP5Q7B8Lty3OH8lwtz92X51Q1vXuIXrcj9o-WP21VoD0AVFd5h-Xp7v_E_gZrHKj2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2544487116</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Yoshida, Tsukasa ; Urikura, Atsushi ; Hosokawa, Yoichiro ; Shirata, Kensei ; Nakaya, Yoshihiro ; Endo, Masahiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Tsukasa ; Urikura, Atsushi ; Hosokawa, Yoichiro ; Shirata, Kensei ; Nakaya, Yoshihiro ; Endo, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><description>We investigated the measurement error and repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using thin-slice imaging. Diffusion-weighted images of an ice-water phantom were acquired using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm thickness. ADC maps were generated at
b
= 0 and 1000 mm
2
/s using five consecutive scans. Measurement errors were assessed with accuracy and precision. Repeatability was assessed using the within-subject coefficient of variation. The ADC accuracy of both scanners agreed with the ADC of water at 0 °C. At 1-mm, precisions were 2.9% and 8.4% for the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The repeatabilities of 1-mm thickness were 1.3% and 3.4% in the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The 3.0-T scanner showed acceptable measurement errors and moderate repeatability compared with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance recommendation. A 3.0-T scanner can be used for reliable ADC measurement, even with a 1-mm thickness at a reasonable scan time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1865-0333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1865-0341</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12194-021-00616-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33725272</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Biomarkers ; Coefficient of variation ; Diffusion ; Diffusion coefficient ; Error analysis ; Image acquisition ; Imaging ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nuclear Medicine ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Reproducibility ; Scanners ; Thickness</subject><ispartof>Radiological physics and technology, 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.203-209</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2021</rights><rights>Japanese Society of Radiological Technology and Japan Society of Medical Physics 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5180-4450</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725272$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urikura, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosokawa, Yoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirata, Kensei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaya, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><title>Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability</title><title>Radiological physics and technology</title><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><description>We investigated the measurement error and repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using thin-slice imaging. Diffusion-weighted images of an ice-water phantom were acquired using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm thickness. ADC maps were generated at
b
= 0 and 1000 mm
2
/s using five consecutive scans. Measurement errors were assessed with accuracy and precision. Repeatability was assessed using the within-subject coefficient of variation. The ADC accuracy of both scanners agreed with the ADC of water at 0 °C. At 1-mm, precisions were 2.9% and 8.4% for the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The repeatabilities of 1-mm thickness were 1.3% and 3.4% in the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The 3.0-T scanner showed acceptable measurement errors and moderate repeatability compared with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance recommendation. A 3.0-T scanner can be used for reliable ADC measurement, even with a 1-mm thickness at a reasonable scan time.</description><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Coefficient of variation</subject><subject>Diffusion</subject><subject>Diffusion coefficient</subject><subject>Error analysis</subject><subject>Image acquisition</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><issn>1865-0333</issn><issn>1865-0341</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwAixQJDbdGDyOf27YVRUFpEps2rXl64xvXSVO8CRCfRjeFd_e0goWrDw6851jy4extyA-gBD2I4GETnEhgQthwHD1jB3DxmguWgXPH-e2PWKviG73kJTyJTtqWyu1tPKY_TqbZ18wL02fYlwpTbkJE8aYQtqrI3paC477uW7zrlluUuY0pIBPFv4T0-5mwb4Z_S7jkkJTkKbsc6VS1arxU-OJkOg-aop_JWMpU6HG5776ZvSL36YhLXev2YvoB8I3D-cJu774fHX-lV9-__Lt_OySB2X0wkPvbSe7DrywGDc2emH8VntvIHTagA4b6OwWq6KxFVHZAEaiR9CdEr1sT9jpIXcu048VaXFjooDD4DNOKzmphZQgOmUr-v4f9HZaS66vq5RSamMBTKXkgQplIioY3VzqP5Q7B8Lty3OH8lwtz92X51Q1vXuIXrcj9o-WP21VoD0AVFd5h-Xp7v_E_gZrHKj2</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Yoshida, Tsukasa</creator><creator>Urikura, Atsushi</creator><creator>Hosokawa, Yoichiro</creator><creator>Shirata, Kensei</creator><creator>Nakaya, Yoshihiro</creator><creator>Endo, Masahiro</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-4450</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability</title><author>Yoshida, Tsukasa ; Urikura, Atsushi ; Hosokawa, Yoichiro ; Shirata, Kensei ; Nakaya, Yoshihiro ; Endo, Masahiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Coefficient of variation</topic><topic>Diffusion</topic><topic>Diffusion coefficient</topic><topic>Error analysis</topic><topic>Image acquisition</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yoshida, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urikura, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosokawa, Yoichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirata, Kensei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakaya, Yoshihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Endo, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Radiological physics and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yoshida, Tsukasa</au><au>Urikura, Atsushi</au><au>Hosokawa, Yoichiro</au><au>Shirata, Kensei</au><au>Nakaya, Yoshihiro</au><au>Endo, Masahiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability</atitle><jtitle>Radiological physics and technology</jtitle><stitle>Radiol Phys Technol</stitle><addtitle>Radiol Phys Technol</addtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>203</spage><epage>209</epage><pages>203-209</pages><issn>1865-0333</issn><eissn>1865-0341</eissn><abstract>We investigated the measurement error and repeatability of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using thin-slice imaging. Diffusion-weighted images of an ice-water phantom were acquired using 1.5-T and 3.0-T scanners with 1-, 3-, and 5-mm thickness. ADC maps were generated at
b
= 0 and 1000 mm
2
/s using five consecutive scans. Measurement errors were assessed with accuracy and precision. Repeatability was assessed using the within-subject coefficient of variation. The ADC accuracy of both scanners agreed with the ADC of water at 0 °C. At 1-mm, precisions were 2.9% and 8.4% for the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The repeatabilities of 1-mm thickness were 1.3% and 3.4% in the 3.0-T and 1.5-T scanners, respectively. The 3.0-T scanner showed acceptable measurement errors and moderate repeatability compared with Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance recommendation. A 3.0-T scanner can be used for reliable ADC measurement, even with a 1-mm thickness at a reasonable scan time.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>33725272</pmid><doi>10.1007/s12194-021-00616-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5180-4450</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1865-0333 |
ispartof | Radiological physics and technology, 2021-06, Vol.14 (2), p.203-209 |
issn | 1865-0333 1865-0341 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2502210947 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Biomarkers Coefficient of variation Diffusion Diffusion coefficient Error analysis Image acquisition Imaging Magnetic resonance imaging Medical and Radiation Physics Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nuclear Medicine Radiology Radiotherapy Reproducibility Scanners Thickness |
title | Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement using thin-slice diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: assessment of measurement errors and repeatability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A08%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Apparent%20diffusion%20coefficient%20measurement%20using%20thin-slice%20diffusion-weighted%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging:%20assessment%20of%20measurement%20errors%20and%20repeatability&rft.jtitle=Radiological%20physics%20and%20technology&rft.au=Yoshida,%20Tsukasa&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=203&rft.epage=209&rft.pages=203-209&rft.issn=1865-0333&rft.eissn=1865-0341&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12194-021-00616-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2544487116%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-cda792991a07ef87fa06ab5aa61c95615c8197be5aa5e30f47c162eae15940d23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2544487116&rft_id=info:pmid/33725272&rfr_iscdi=true |