Loading…
Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy
In the flurry of analyses of Joe Biden's early policy moves, there is a common thread that depicts the 46th president as an agent of change towards predictability in policymaking, and as a much-desired course correction after the chaotic Trump years. In undoing the political and reputational da...
Saved in:
Published in: | East Asia Forum quarterly (Online) 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.32-33 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Magazinearticle |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 33 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 32 |
container_title | East Asia Forum quarterly (Online) |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Grgic, Gorana |
description | In the flurry of analyses of Joe Biden's early policy moves, there is a common thread that depicts the 46th president as an agent of change towards predictability in policymaking, and as a much-desired course correction after the chaotic Trump years. In undoing the political and reputational damage done by his predecessor, Biden has a hefty task of convincing both Americans and America-watchers that the United States still occupies a central role in the international system and can act as a force for good.Unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden is a foreign policy veteran, having served as the Senate Foreign Relations Chair and a two-term vice president. Much like the famous rhyme for marital success, Biden has decided to opt for 'something old' and surround himself with people he has had a track record working with. His foreign policy team comprises long-time practitioners and experts, many of whom were integral to the Obama administration and the Clinton cabinet. |
format | magazinearticle |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506474301</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2506474301</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_25064743013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDA21zU1sIxggbMtDDkYeIuLswwMDIyMTIwtDC04GQxd8nNTi0sykxVSMssyizPz84oVclITy1IVknIS87KLFTLzFEKDFRyLMxMVCvJzMpMreRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4aba4izh25BUX5hKdCs-NzM4uTUHKD21PzS4ngjUwMzE3MTYwNDYxKUAgA2mTka</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><pqid>2506474301</pqid></control><display><type>magazinearticle</type><title>Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Grgic, Gorana</creator><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gorana</creatorcontrib><description>In the flurry of analyses of Joe Biden's early policy moves, there is a common thread that depicts the 46th president as an agent of change towards predictability in policymaking, and as a much-desired course correction after the chaotic Trump years. In undoing the political and reputational damage done by his predecessor, Biden has a hefty task of convincing both Americans and America-watchers that the United States still occupies a central role in the international system and can act as a force for good.Unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden is a foreign policy veteran, having served as the Senate Foreign Relations Chair and a two-term vice president. Much like the famous rhyme for marital success, Biden has decided to opt for 'something old' and surround himself with people he has had a track record working with. His foreign policy team comprises long-time practitioners and experts, many of whom were integral to the Obama administration and the Clinton cabinet.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1837-5081</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1837-509X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canberra: Australian National University Press</publisher><subject>Biden, Joseph R Jr ; Change agents ; COVID-19 ; Foreign policy ; International relations ; Legislatures ; Partisanship ; Policy making ; Presidents ; Rhyme ; Strategic planning ; Teams ; Vice Presidents</subject><ispartof>East Asia Forum quarterly (Online), 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.32-33</ispartof><rights>Copyright Australian National University Press Jan-Mar 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2506474301?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,14660,21427,21434,27865,33224,33612,33986,43733,43948</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gorana</creatorcontrib><title>Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy</title><title>East Asia Forum quarterly (Online)</title><description>In the flurry of analyses of Joe Biden's early policy moves, there is a common thread that depicts the 46th president as an agent of change towards predictability in policymaking, and as a much-desired course correction after the chaotic Trump years. In undoing the political and reputational damage done by his predecessor, Biden has a hefty task of convincing both Americans and America-watchers that the United States still occupies a central role in the international system and can act as a force for good.Unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden is a foreign policy veteran, having served as the Senate Foreign Relations Chair and a two-term vice president. Much like the famous rhyme for marital success, Biden has decided to opt for 'something old' and surround himself with people he has had a track record working with. His foreign policy team comprises long-time practitioners and experts, many of whom were integral to the Obama administration and the Clinton cabinet.</description><subject>Biden, Joseph R Jr</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Partisanship</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Rhyme</subject><subject>Strategic planning</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Vice Presidents</subject><issn>1837-5081</issn><issn>1837-509X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>magazinearticle</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDA21zU1sIxggbMtDDkYeIuLswwMDIyMTIwtDC04GQxd8nNTi0sykxVSMssyizPz84oVclITy1IVknIS87KLFTLzFEKDFRyLMxMVCvJzMpMreRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4aba4izh25BUX5hKdCs-NzM4uTUHKD21PzS4ngjUwMzE3MTYwNDYxKUAgA2mTka</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Grgic, Gorana</creator><general>Australian National University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AYAGU</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy</title><author>Grgic, Gorana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_25064743013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>magazinearticle</rsrctype><prefilter>magazinearticle</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biden, Joseph R Jr</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Partisanship</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Rhyme</topic><topic>Strategic planning</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Vice Presidents</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Gorana</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Australia & New Zealand Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>East Asia Forum quarterly (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grgic, Gorana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy</atitle><jtitle>East Asia Forum quarterly (Online)</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>32</spage><epage>33</epage><pages>32-33</pages><issn>1837-5081</issn><eissn>1837-509X</eissn><abstract>In the flurry of analyses of Joe Biden's early policy moves, there is a common thread that depicts the 46th president as an agent of change towards predictability in policymaking, and as a much-desired course correction after the chaotic Trump years. In undoing the political and reputational damage done by his predecessor, Biden has a hefty task of convincing both Americans and America-watchers that the United States still occupies a central role in the international system and can act as a force for good.Unlike Donald Trump, Joe Biden is a foreign policy veteran, having served as the Senate Foreign Relations Chair and a two-term vice president. Much like the famous rhyme for marital success, Biden has decided to opt for 'something old' and surround himself with people he has had a track record working with. His foreign policy team comprises long-time practitioners and experts, many of whom were integral to the Obama administration and the Clinton cabinet.</abstract><cop>Canberra</cop><pub>Australian National University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1837-5081 |
ispartof | East Asia Forum quarterly (Online), 2021-01, Vol.13 (1), p.32-33 |
issn | 1837-5081 1837-509X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2506474301 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Politics Collection; Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); PAIS Index |
subjects | Biden, Joseph R Jr Change agents COVID-19 Foreign policy International relations Legislatures Partisanship Policy making Presidents Rhyme Strategic planning Teams Vice Presidents |
title | Domestic divisions leave blanks in US Asia policy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T21%3A10%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Domestic%20divisions%20leave%20blanks%20in%20US%20Asia%20policy&rft.jtitle=East%20Asia%20Forum%20quarterly%20(Online)&rft.au=Grgic,%20Gorana&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=32&rft.epage=33&rft.pages=32-33&rft.issn=1837-5081&rft.eissn=1837-509X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2506474301%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_25064743013%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2506474301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |