Loading…

Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain

To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Current medical research and opinion 2021-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1031-1038
Main Authors: Peres, Mario F. P., Vasudeva, Raghavendra, Baygani, Simin K., Dennehy, Ellen B., Vincent, Maurice, Friedman, Deborah I.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3
container_end_page 1038
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1031
container_title Current medical research and opinion
container_volume 37
creator Peres, Mario F. P.
Vasudeva, Raghavendra
Baygani, Simin K.
Dennehy, Ellen B.
Vincent, Maurice
Friedman, Deborah I.
description To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02565186]) were assessed. Efficacy measures included the proportion of attacks with 2-h pain freedom (PF), 2-h most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, and 24-h sustained pain freedom (SPF). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of PF, SPF, or MBS freedom outcomes among attacks treated at mild, moderate, or severe pain. In SAMURAI and SPARTAN, most treated attacks were of moderate (N = 2768) or severe (N = 1147) intensity, compared to mild (N = 65). Numerically greater 2-h PF and 24-h SPF response rates were observed in attacks treated at mild compared to moderate or severe pain. Analysis of GLADIATOR data included 273 (1.5%), 11,644 (65.1%), and 5948 (33.3%) attacks treated when pain was mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. In general, a significantly greater proportion of attacks treated at mild pain achieved 2-h PF and MBS freedom, as well as 24-h SPF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in LTN treatment groups were similar regardless of baseline head pain intensity. Data from two placebo-controlled, single-attack trials, and an open-label study including treatment of multiple attacks, suggested a tendency to relatively better efficacy outcomes when LTN treatment was initiated at mild vs. moderate to severe pain. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship of lasmiditan outcomes to the time of administration in the course of a migraine attack.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03007995.2021.1903846
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507667157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2507667157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BJCXbFJm4sROdiDESypiA2vL2GMw5FHslKp_T6oWlqxGGp17r3QYO0WYIlRwAQJA1XU5zSHHKdYgqkLusAkWSmRFpdQum6yZbA0dsMOUPgAwr-p6nx0IoaqiFjBhjzOT2uDCYDpO3gdr7IqHjrfhLZrQETfDYOxn4sswvI_fxvHvNOVt7yiagXgfeaJvisTnI37M9rxpEp1s7xF7ub15vr7PZk93D9dXs8wWKIaMnC8dqsKBrLAQlSyV90Ih1dJYUCDQF6aWWOWkBFiTg5VoUSl0IpcliSN2vumdx_5rQWnQbUiWmsZ01C-SzktQUios1YiWG9TGPqVIXs9jaE1caQS9Nql_Teq1Sb01OebOthOL15bcX-pX3QhcboDQ-T62ZtnHxunBrJo--mg6G5IW_2_8ANlggQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507667157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Peres, Mario F. P. ; Vasudeva, Raghavendra ; Baygani, Simin K. ; Dennehy, Ellen B. ; Vincent, Maurice ; Friedman, Deborah I.</creator><creatorcontrib>Peres, Mario F. P. ; Vasudeva, Raghavendra ; Baygani, Simin K. ; Dennehy, Ellen B. ; Vincent, Maurice ; Friedman, Deborah I.</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02565186]) were assessed. Efficacy measures included the proportion of attacks with 2-h pain freedom (PF), 2-h most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, and 24-h sustained pain freedom (SPF). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of PF, SPF, or MBS freedom outcomes among attacks treated at mild, moderate, or severe pain. In SAMURAI and SPARTAN, most treated attacks were of moderate (N = 2768) or severe (N = 1147) intensity, compared to mild (N = 65). Numerically greater 2-h PF and 24-h SPF response rates were observed in attacks treated at mild compared to moderate or severe pain. Analysis of GLADIATOR data included 273 (1.5%), 11,644 (65.1%), and 5948 (33.3%) attacks treated when pain was mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. In general, a significantly greater proportion of attacks treated at mild pain achieved 2-h PF and MBS freedom, as well as 24-h SPF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in LTN treatment groups were similar regardless of baseline head pain intensity. Data from two placebo-controlled, single-attack trials, and an open-label study including treatment of multiple attacks, suggested a tendency to relatively better efficacy outcomes when LTN treatment was initiated at mild vs. moderate to severe pain. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship of lasmiditan outcomes to the time of administration in the course of a migraine attack.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-7995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1903846</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33784930</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>intensity ; Lasmiditan ; migraine attack ; NCT02439320 ; NCT02565186 ; NCT02605174</subject><ispartof>Current medical research and opinion, 2021-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1031-1038</ispartof><rights>2021 Eli Lilly and Company. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5855-6069 ; 0000-0002-0068-1905</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33784930$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Peres, Mario F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudeva, Raghavendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baygani, Simin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennehy, Ellen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Deborah I.</creatorcontrib><title>Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain</title><title>Current medical research and opinion</title><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><description>To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02565186]) were assessed. Efficacy measures included the proportion of attacks with 2-h pain freedom (PF), 2-h most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, and 24-h sustained pain freedom (SPF). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of PF, SPF, or MBS freedom outcomes among attacks treated at mild, moderate, or severe pain. In SAMURAI and SPARTAN, most treated attacks were of moderate (N = 2768) or severe (N = 1147) intensity, compared to mild (N = 65). Numerically greater 2-h PF and 24-h SPF response rates were observed in attacks treated at mild compared to moderate or severe pain. Analysis of GLADIATOR data included 273 (1.5%), 11,644 (65.1%), and 5948 (33.3%) attacks treated when pain was mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. In general, a significantly greater proportion of attacks treated at mild pain achieved 2-h PF and MBS freedom, as well as 24-h SPF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in LTN treatment groups were similar regardless of baseline head pain intensity. Data from two placebo-controlled, single-attack trials, and an open-label study including treatment of multiple attacks, suggested a tendency to relatively better efficacy outcomes when LTN treatment was initiated at mild vs. moderate to severe pain. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship of lasmiditan outcomes to the time of administration in the course of a migraine attack.</description><subject>intensity</subject><subject>Lasmiditan</subject><subject>migraine attack</subject><subject>NCT02439320</subject><subject>NCT02565186</subject><subject>NCT02605174</subject><issn>0300-7995</issn><issn>1473-4877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EgvL4BJCXbFJm4sROdiDESypiA2vL2GMw5FHslKp_T6oWlqxGGp17r3QYO0WYIlRwAQJA1XU5zSHHKdYgqkLusAkWSmRFpdQum6yZbA0dsMOUPgAwr-p6nx0IoaqiFjBhjzOT2uDCYDpO3gdr7IqHjrfhLZrQETfDYOxn4sswvI_fxvHvNOVt7yiagXgfeaJvisTnI37M9rxpEp1s7xF7ub15vr7PZk93D9dXs8wWKIaMnC8dqsKBrLAQlSyV90Ih1dJYUCDQF6aWWOWkBFiTg5VoUSl0IpcliSN2vumdx_5rQWnQbUiWmsZ01C-SzktQUios1YiWG9TGPqVIXs9jaE1caQS9Nql_Teq1Sb01OebOthOL15bcX-pX3QhcboDQ-T62ZtnHxunBrJo--mg6G5IW_2_8ANlggQo</recordid><startdate>20210603</startdate><enddate>20210603</enddate><creator>Peres, Mario F. P.</creator><creator>Vasudeva, Raghavendra</creator><creator>Baygani, Simin K.</creator><creator>Dennehy, Ellen B.</creator><creator>Vincent, Maurice</creator><creator>Friedman, Deborah I.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-6069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1905</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210603</creationdate><title>Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain</title><author>Peres, Mario F. P. ; Vasudeva, Raghavendra ; Baygani, Simin K. ; Dennehy, Ellen B. ; Vincent, Maurice ; Friedman, Deborah I.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>intensity</topic><topic>Lasmiditan</topic><topic>migraine attack</topic><topic>NCT02439320</topic><topic>NCT02565186</topic><topic>NCT02605174</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peres, Mario F. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasudeva, Raghavendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baygani, Simin K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dennehy, Ellen B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Friedman, Deborah I.</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis Open Access Journals</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peres, Mario F. P.</au><au>Vasudeva, Raghavendra</au><au>Baygani, Simin K.</au><au>Dennehy, Ellen B.</au><au>Vincent, Maurice</au><au>Friedman, Deborah I.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain</atitle><jtitle>Current medical research and opinion</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Med Res Opin</addtitle><date>2021-06-03</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1031</spage><epage>1038</epage><pages>1031-1038</pages><issn>0300-7995</issn><eissn>1473-4877</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy of lasmiditan (LTN) in treating migraine attacks of mild vs. moderate or severe pain intensity. Pooled data from two single-attack, placebo-controlled studies (SAMURAI [NCT02439320] and SPARTAN [NCT02605174]), and a prospective, randomized, open-label study (GLADIATOR [NCT02565186]) were assessed. Efficacy measures included the proportion of attacks with 2-h pain freedom (PF), 2-h most bothersome symptom (MBS) freedom, and 24-h sustained pain freedom (SPF). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the proportion of PF, SPF, or MBS freedom outcomes among attacks treated at mild, moderate, or severe pain. In SAMURAI and SPARTAN, most treated attacks were of moderate (N = 2768) or severe (N = 1147) intensity, compared to mild (N = 65). Numerically greater 2-h PF and 24-h SPF response rates were observed in attacks treated at mild compared to moderate or severe pain. Analysis of GLADIATOR data included 273 (1.5%), 11,644 (65.1%), and 5948 (33.3%) attacks treated when pain was mild, moderate, and severe, respectively. In general, a significantly greater proportion of attacks treated at mild pain achieved 2-h PF and MBS freedom, as well as 24-h SPF. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events in LTN treatment groups were similar regardless of baseline head pain intensity. Data from two placebo-controlled, single-attack trials, and an open-label study including treatment of multiple attacks, suggested a tendency to relatively better efficacy outcomes when LTN treatment was initiated at mild vs. moderate to severe pain. Further research is needed to better understand the relationship of lasmiditan outcomes to the time of administration in the course of a migraine attack.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>33784930</pmid><doi>10.1080/03007995.2021.1903846</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-6069</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0068-1905</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-7995
ispartof Current medical research and opinion, 2021-06, Vol.37 (6), p.1031-1038
issn 0300-7995
1473-4877
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507667157
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
subjects intensity
Lasmiditan
migraine attack
NCT02439320
NCT02565186
NCT02605174
title Lasmiditan efficacy in migraine attacks with mild vs. moderate or severe pain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A16%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lasmiditan%20efficacy%20in%20migraine%20attacks%20with%20mild%20vs.%20moderate%20or%20severe%20pain&rft.jtitle=Current%20medical%20research%20and%20opinion&rft.au=Peres,%20Mario%20F.%20P.&rft.date=2021-06-03&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1031&rft.epage=1038&rft.pages=1031-1038&rft.issn=0300-7995&rft.eissn=1473-4877&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03007995.2021.1903846&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2507667157%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-edf5d174d0681438657ff371e96ac07031f4a96182e730ca20c61c1771d3265e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507667157&rft_id=info:pmid/33784930&rfr_iscdi=true