Solid Components in the Mediastinal Window of Computed Tomography Define a Distinct Subtype of Subsolid Nodules in Clinical Stage I Lung Cancers

• Published in: Clinical lung cancer 2021-07, Vol.22 (4), p.324-331
• Main Authors: Yin, Jiacheng, Xi, Junjie, Liang, Jiaqi, Zhan, Cheng, Jiang, Wei, Lin, Zongwu, Xu, Songtao, Wang, Qun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adenocarcinoma of Lung - diagnostic imaging; Adenocarcinoma of Lung - genetics; Adenocarcinoma of Lung - pathology; Aged; Computed tomography; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Heterogeneous ground-glass nodule; Humans; Lung adenocarcinoma; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging; Lung Neoplasms - genetics; Lung Neoplasms - pathology; Lymphatic Metastasis - pathology; Male; Mediastinal window; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Staging; Part-solid nodule; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Sex Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods
• ISSN: 1525-7304; 1938-0690
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.02.015

We aimed to validate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic value of the presence of solid components in the mediastinal window of computed tomography scan in clinical stage I pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs). We retrospectively evaluated patients with pulmonary SSNs resected between 2011 and 2016. We classified SSNs into heterogeneous ground-glass nodules (HGGNs) (solid component detected only in lung window) and part-solid nodules (PSNs) (solid component detected both in lung/mediastinal windows). A total of 487 patients (216 PSNs) were included. PSNs were associated with higher frequencies of micropapillary or solid pathologic patterns (18.1% vs. 3.3%; P < .001), epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation (39.4% vs. 32.8%), and other types of gene mutations (2.3% vs. 1.1%; P = .043). Logistic regression analysis revealed that male sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.20-5.57; P = .016) and higher consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) (OR, 110.04; 95% CI, 8.56-1414.39; P < .001) remained independent for invasive adenocarcinomas with poor differentiation. Receiver operating characteristic analyses revealed that solid component size in the mediastinal window (area under the curve [AUC], 0.731; 95% CI, 0.653-0.808; P < .0001) showed a better predictive ability to poor differentiation compared with solid component size in the lung window and CTR. The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate of PSNs was worse than that of HGGNs (94.6% vs. 99.1%; P = .019). Multivariate Cox regression revealed that positive lymph node status (hazard ratio, 22.99; 95% CI, 4.52-116.86; P < .001) indicated worse RFS for PSNs. SSNs with solid components in mediastinal window demonstrated clinicopathologic and prognostic features different from those without in clinical stage I lung cancer. Solid components in mediastinal window was a strong predictor of poor differentiation. This study aimed to validate the prognostic value of the presence of solid components in the mediastinal window in clinical stage I pulmonary subsolid nodules (SSNs) (487 patients included). SSNs with solid components in the mediastinal window demonstrated worse clinicopathologic behavior and prognosis compared with those without. Solid components in mediastinal window was a strong predictor of poor differentiation.