To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial

Burn injuries can be associated with the incidence of disability and death, yet their management remains a costly difficult problem. We conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the period of wound healing with sea buckthorn dressings for the second‐degree burns and compare the results with 1% silve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wound repair and regeneration 2021-09, Vol.29 (5), p.732-740
Main Authors: Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad, Shafiee, Saeed
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Anti-Infective Agents, Local
Bandages
burns
Burns - drug therapy
dressings
Hippophae
Humans
sea buckthorn
silver sulfadiazine
Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use
Sulfadiazine
Wound Healing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863
container_end_page 740
container_issue 5
container_start_page 732
container_title Wound repair and regeneration
container_volume 29
creator Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad
Shafiee, Saeed
description Burn injuries can be associated with the incidence of disability and death, yet their management remains a costly difficult problem. We conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the period of wound healing with sea buckthorn dressings for the second‐degree burns and compare the results with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) dressings. This randomized triple‐blind clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Fifty‐five patients suffering second‐degree burns were recruited through convenient sampling and randomly divided into two groups and treated with either sea buckthorn cream or 1% SSD. Wound dressings were done until complete wound healing was attained. The process of healing burns was monitored using the Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool; complete healing was determined by using the standard burn healing checklist. It was deduced that the period of healing second‐degree burns in the group treated with sea buckthorn cream was shorter than the group treated with 1% SSD (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/wrr.12916
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507733159</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2507733159</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9uFSEUh4nR2D-66AsYlnYxLTAXuLhrGltNmpg0NbqbMHDopTIwwow37aqP0Jfxhfok5XqrO1nACec731n8EDqg5IjWc7zO-YgyRcULtEs5WzQLyb-_rDURsqGKyR20V8oNIYRztXyNdtpWKlYnd9Hvq4RNGkadAU8rwOAcmAknhwto3M_mx7RKOWIdLS4-_IKMyxyctl7f-QjYZijFx2ucIh4h-2Q3s-s0V34FOmxavrb05CFOBa_9tKpqk6J9vH-wcJ0B6pocywd8gnNdkwZ_BxZP2Y8BKtNXh8Wm3t7osPnX4Q165XQo8Pb53Udfzz5enX5qLr6cfz49uWhMy7hoGGmdVlw4RqXgmiycAKKUE9ZKLqXQBIS0zqq-J8ZpaCnnPaPaLGDZkqVo99H7rXfM6ecMZeoGXwyEoCOkuXSMEynbOqYqerhFTU6lZHDdmP2g821HSbdJqaspdX9Squy7Z-3cD2D_kX9jqcDxFlj7ALf_N3XfLi-3yif_m6Ik</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2507733159</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad ; Shafiee, Saeed</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad ; Shafiee, Saeed</creatorcontrib><description>Burn injuries can be associated with the incidence of disability and death, yet their management remains a costly difficult problem. We conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the period of wound healing with sea buckthorn dressings for the second‐degree burns and compare the results with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) dressings. This randomized triple‐blind clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Fifty‐five patients suffering second‐degree burns were recruited through convenient sampling and randomly divided into two groups and treated with either sea buckthorn cream or 1% SSD. Wound dressings were done until complete wound healing was attained. The process of healing burns was monitored using the Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool; complete healing was determined by using the standard burn healing checklist. It was deduced that the period of healing second‐degree burns in the group treated with sea buckthorn cream was shorter than the group treated with 1% SSD (p &lt; 0.001). The results demonstrated the greater clinical efficacy of sea buckthorn cream over 1% SSD for healing second‐degree burns. It was concluded that using sea buckthorn dressing by reducing the period of wound healing can shorten the course of treatment of second‐degree burns as well as reduce the burden of care in health care services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1067-1927</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1524-475X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/wrr.12916</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33792111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local ; Bandages ; burns ; Burns - drug therapy ; dressings ; Hippophae ; Humans ; sea buckthorn ; silver sulfadiazine ; Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use ; Sulfadiazine ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-09, Vol.29 (5), p.732-740</ispartof><rights>2021 The Wound Healing Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3619-038X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33792111$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafiee, Saeed</creatorcontrib><title>To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial</title><title>Wound repair and regeneration</title><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><description>Burn injuries can be associated with the incidence of disability and death, yet their management remains a costly difficult problem. We conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the period of wound healing with sea buckthorn dressings for the second‐degree burns and compare the results with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) dressings. This randomized triple‐blind clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Fifty‐five patients suffering second‐degree burns were recruited through convenient sampling and randomly divided into two groups and treated with either sea buckthorn cream or 1% SSD. Wound dressings were done until complete wound healing was attained. The process of healing burns was monitored using the Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool; complete healing was determined by using the standard burn healing checklist. It was deduced that the period of healing second‐degree burns in the group treated with sea buckthorn cream was shorter than the group treated with 1% SSD (p &lt; 0.001). The results demonstrated the greater clinical efficacy of sea buckthorn cream over 1% SSD for healing second‐degree burns. It was concluded that using sea buckthorn dressing by reducing the period of wound healing can shorten the course of treatment of second‐degree burns as well as reduce the burden of care in health care services.</description><subject>Anti-Infective Agents, Local</subject><subject>Bandages</subject><subject>burns</subject><subject>Burns - drug therapy</subject><subject>dressings</subject><subject>Hippophae</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>sea buckthorn</subject><subject>silver sulfadiazine</subject><subject>Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Sulfadiazine</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>1067-1927</issn><issn>1524-475X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kc9uFSEUh4nR2D-66AsYlnYxLTAXuLhrGltNmpg0NbqbMHDopTIwwow37aqP0Jfxhfok5XqrO1nACec731n8EDqg5IjWc7zO-YgyRcULtEs5WzQLyb-_rDURsqGKyR20V8oNIYRztXyNdtpWKlYnd9Hvq4RNGkadAU8rwOAcmAknhwto3M_mx7RKOWIdLS4-_IKMyxyctl7f-QjYZijFx2ucIh4h-2Q3s-s0V34FOmxavrb05CFOBa_9tKpqk6J9vH-wcJ0B6pocywd8gnNdkwZ_BxZP2Y8BKtNXh8Wm3t7osPnX4Q165XQo8Pb53Udfzz5enX5qLr6cfz49uWhMy7hoGGmdVlw4RqXgmiycAKKUE9ZKLqXQBIS0zqq-J8ZpaCnnPaPaLGDZkqVo99H7rXfM6ecMZeoGXwyEoCOkuXSMEynbOqYqerhFTU6lZHDdmP2g821HSbdJqaspdX9Squy7Z-3cD2D_kX9jqcDxFlj7ALf_N3XfLi-3yif_m6Ik</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad</creator><creator>Shafiee, Saeed</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-038X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial</title><author>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad ; Shafiee, Saeed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Anti-Infective Agents, Local</topic><topic>Bandages</topic><topic>burns</topic><topic>Burns - drug therapy</topic><topic>dressings</topic><topic>Hippophae</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>sea buckthorn</topic><topic>silver sulfadiazine</topic><topic>Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Sulfadiazine</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shafiee, Saeed</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdullahzadeh, Mehrdad</au><au>Shafiee, Saeed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Wound repair and regeneration</jtitle><addtitle>Wound Repair Regen</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>732</spage><epage>740</epage><pages>732-740</pages><issn>1067-1927</issn><eissn>1524-475X</eissn><abstract>Burn injuries can be associated with the incidence of disability and death, yet their management remains a costly difficult problem. We conducted this clinical trial to evaluate the period of wound healing with sea buckthorn dressings for the second‐degree burns and compare the results with 1% silver sulfadiazine (SSD) dressings. This randomized triple‐blind clinical trial was conducted in a hospital in Isfahan, Iran. Fifty‐five patients suffering second‐degree burns were recruited through convenient sampling and randomly divided into two groups and treated with either sea buckthorn cream or 1% SSD. Wound dressings were done until complete wound healing was attained. The process of healing burns was monitored using the Bates‐Jensen Wound Assessment Tool; complete healing was determined by using the standard burn healing checklist. It was deduced that the period of healing second‐degree burns in the group treated with sea buckthorn cream was shorter than the group treated with 1% SSD (p &lt; 0.001). The results demonstrated the greater clinical efficacy of sea buckthorn cream over 1% SSD for healing second‐degree burns. It was concluded that using sea buckthorn dressing by reducing the period of wound healing can shorten the course of treatment of second‐degree burns as well as reduce the burden of care in health care services.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>33792111</pmid><doi>10.1111/wrr.12916</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3619-038X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1067-1927
ispartof Wound repair and regeneration, 2021-09, Vol.29 (5), p.732-740
issn 1067-1927
1524-475X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2507733159
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Anti-Infective Agents, Local
Bandages
burns
Burns - drug therapy
dressings
Hippophae
Humans
sea buckthorn
silver sulfadiazine
Silver Sulfadiazine - therapeutic use
Sulfadiazine
Wound Healing
title To compare the effect of sea buckthorn and silver sulfadiazine dressing on period of wound healing in patients with second‐degree burns: A randomized triple‐blind clinical trial
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A13%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20compare%20the%20effect%20of%20sea%20buckthorn%20and%20silver%20sulfadiazine%20dressing%20on%20period%20of%20wound%20healing%20in%20patients%20with%20second%E2%80%90degree%20burns:%20A%20randomized%20triple%E2%80%90blind%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Wound%20repair%20and%20regeneration&rft.au=Abdullahzadeh,%20Mehrdad&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=732&rft.epage=740&rft.pages=732-740&rft.issn=1067-1927&rft.eissn=1524-475X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/wrr.12916&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2507733159%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3256-203fa956f21765a04f6e099f6dd75776a0e67dfd9bb0cfae3155b21ac4e830863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2507733159&rft_id=info:pmid/33792111&rfr_iscdi=true