Loading…

Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture

New agronomic and management approaches are urgently required to meet the challenges of improving resource use efficiency and crop yields in intensive agricultural systems. Here we report the fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), fate of fertilizer N and N budgets in newly designed cropping systems as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2021-07, Vol.280, p.116967-116967, Article 116967
Main Authors: Zhang, Chong, Rees, Robert M., Ju, Xiaotang
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33
container_end_page 116967
container_issue
container_start_page 116967
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 280
creator Zhang, Chong
Rees, Robert M.
Ju, Xiaotang
description New agronomic and management approaches are urgently required to meet the challenges of improving resource use efficiency and crop yields in intensive agricultural systems. Here we report the fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), fate of fertilizer N and N budgets in newly designed cropping systems as compared with conventional winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (Con. W/M) in the North China Plain. A15N labelling approach was used to quantify FNUE by these new cropping systems which included optimized winter wheat-summer maize (Opt. W/M) with two harvests in one year; winter wheat/summer maize-spring maize (W/M-M) and winter wheat/summer soybean-spring maize (W/S-M) with three harvests in two years, and spring maize (M) with one harvest in one year. The results showed that only 18–20% of fertilizer N was recovered by crops in Con. W/M. Although Opt. W/M significantly increased FNUE to 33%–35% with increased crop yields, it consumed as much groundwater as Con. W/M. The W/M-M, W/S-M and M significantly increased FNUE to 27%–44% and reduced groundwater use and fertilizer N losses when compared to Con. W/M. The W/M-M achieved a comparable grain yield, but W/S-M and M had significantly lower grain yields when compared to Con. W/M. However, grain N harvest in W/S-M was comparable with Con. W/M due to higher grain N content in soybean. Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake provided little contribution to total N uptake, and accounted for 5%, 12%, 7% and 2% of the average N uptake for winter wheat, spring maize, summer maize and summer soybean, respectively. When taking the second crop into account, Con. W/M recovered 27% of fertilizer N, while it increased to 36%–50% under the new cropping systems. We conclude that W/M-M and W/S-M will deliver significant improvements in the environmental footprints and sustainability of intensively managed cropping systems in the North China Plain. [Display omitted] •Conventional winter wheat-summer maize had a low N and water use efficiency and high fertilizer N losses.•Optimized winter wheat-summer maize increased grain yield and fertilizer N use efficiency but consumed large groundwater.•Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake made little contribution to total crop N, even fertilizer was applied in later growth stage.•Winter wheat/summer maize (or soybean)-spring maize are alternative cropping systems for sustainable crop production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116967
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508564325</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749121005492</els_id><sourcerecordid>2508564325</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwBgh5ZEnxLU6yIKGKm1SJBUZkufZJ5Cpxgp1U6tuTksLIdIbz_efyIXRNyZISKu-2S_C7rq2XjDC6pFQWMjtBc5pnPJGCiVM0J0wWSSYKOkMXMW4JIYJzfo5mnGdFQVk-R5-r0Had8xWO-9hDgy1EV3lstMeu6UK7A-xdH9oKPB4iYChLZxx4s8duRHwPProd1HvcaK8rsFhXwZmh7ocAl-is1HWEq2NdoI-nx_fVS7J-e35dPawTwyXrE0FzBjknNE8pE2YDhkJBcisIKUuSpoXkhRybwPWGZpzrErIN5bnW2lppOV-g22nuePDXALFXjYsG6lp7aIeoWEryVArO0hEVE2pCG2OAUnXBNTrsFSXqIFZt1SRWHcSqSewYuzluGDYN2L_Qr8kRuJ8AGP_cOQgq_mgC6wKYXtnW_b_hG32HjLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2508564325</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zhang, Chong ; Rees, Robert M. ; Ju, Xiaotang</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chong ; Rees, Robert M. ; Ju, Xiaotang</creatorcontrib><description>New agronomic and management approaches are urgently required to meet the challenges of improving resource use efficiency and crop yields in intensive agricultural systems. Here we report the fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), fate of fertilizer N and N budgets in newly designed cropping systems as compared with conventional winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (Con. W/M) in the North China Plain. A15N labelling approach was used to quantify FNUE by these new cropping systems which included optimized winter wheat-summer maize (Opt. W/M) with two harvests in one year; winter wheat/summer maize-spring maize (W/M-M) and winter wheat/summer soybean-spring maize (W/S-M) with three harvests in two years, and spring maize (M) with one harvest in one year. The results showed that only 18–20% of fertilizer N was recovered by crops in Con. W/M. Although Opt. W/M significantly increased FNUE to 33%–35% with increased crop yields, it consumed as much groundwater as Con. W/M. The W/M-M, W/S-M and M significantly increased FNUE to 27%–44% and reduced groundwater use and fertilizer N losses when compared to Con. W/M. The W/M-M achieved a comparable grain yield, but W/S-M and M had significantly lower grain yields when compared to Con. W/M. However, grain N harvest in W/S-M was comparable with Con. W/M due to higher grain N content in soybean. Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake provided little contribution to total N uptake, and accounted for 5%, 12%, 7% and 2% of the average N uptake for winter wheat, spring maize, summer maize and summer soybean, respectively. When taking the second crop into account, Con. W/M recovered 27% of fertilizer N, while it increased to 36%–50% under the new cropping systems. We conclude that W/M-M and W/S-M will deliver significant improvements in the environmental footprints and sustainability of intensively managed cropping systems in the North China Plain. [Display omitted] •Conventional winter wheat-summer maize had a low N and water use efficiency and high fertilizer N losses.•Optimized winter wheat-summer maize increased grain yield and fertilizer N use efficiency but consumed large groundwater.•Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake made little contribution to total crop N, even fertilizer was applied in later growth stage.•Winter wheat/summer maize (or soybean)-spring maize are alternative cropping systems for sustainable crop production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116967</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33799128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>15N labelling ; Cropping system design ; Fate of fertilizer N ; Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency (FNUE) ; Groundwater use efficiency ; Intensive agriculture</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2021-07, Vol.280, p.116967-116967, Article 116967</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2593-9500</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33799128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Xiaotang</creatorcontrib><title>Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>New agronomic and management approaches are urgently required to meet the challenges of improving resource use efficiency and crop yields in intensive agricultural systems. Here we report the fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), fate of fertilizer N and N budgets in newly designed cropping systems as compared with conventional winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (Con. W/M) in the North China Plain. A15N labelling approach was used to quantify FNUE by these new cropping systems which included optimized winter wheat-summer maize (Opt. W/M) with two harvests in one year; winter wheat/summer maize-spring maize (W/M-M) and winter wheat/summer soybean-spring maize (W/S-M) with three harvests in two years, and spring maize (M) with one harvest in one year. The results showed that only 18–20% of fertilizer N was recovered by crops in Con. W/M. Although Opt. W/M significantly increased FNUE to 33%–35% with increased crop yields, it consumed as much groundwater as Con. W/M. The W/M-M, W/S-M and M significantly increased FNUE to 27%–44% and reduced groundwater use and fertilizer N losses when compared to Con. W/M. The W/M-M achieved a comparable grain yield, but W/S-M and M had significantly lower grain yields when compared to Con. W/M. However, grain N harvest in W/S-M was comparable with Con. W/M due to higher grain N content in soybean. Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake provided little contribution to total N uptake, and accounted for 5%, 12%, 7% and 2% of the average N uptake for winter wheat, spring maize, summer maize and summer soybean, respectively. When taking the second crop into account, Con. W/M recovered 27% of fertilizer N, while it increased to 36%–50% under the new cropping systems. We conclude that W/M-M and W/S-M will deliver significant improvements in the environmental footprints and sustainability of intensively managed cropping systems in the North China Plain. [Display omitted] •Conventional winter wheat-summer maize had a low N and water use efficiency and high fertilizer N losses.•Optimized winter wheat-summer maize increased grain yield and fertilizer N use efficiency but consumed large groundwater.•Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake made little contribution to total crop N, even fertilizer was applied in later growth stage.•Winter wheat/summer maize (or soybean)-spring maize are alternative cropping systems for sustainable crop production.</description><subject>15N labelling</subject><subject>Cropping system design</subject><subject>Fate of fertilizer N</subject><subject>Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency (FNUE)</subject><subject>Groundwater use efficiency</subject><subject>Intensive agriculture</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EoqXwBgh5ZEnxLU6yIKGKm1SJBUZkufZJ5Cpxgp1U6tuTksLIdIbz_efyIXRNyZISKu-2S_C7rq2XjDC6pFQWMjtBc5pnPJGCiVM0J0wWSSYKOkMXMW4JIYJzfo5mnGdFQVk-R5-r0Had8xWO-9hDgy1EV3lstMeu6UK7A-xdH9oKPB4iYChLZxx4s8duRHwPProd1HvcaK8rsFhXwZmh7ocAl-is1HWEq2NdoI-nx_fVS7J-e35dPawTwyXrE0FzBjknNE8pE2YDhkJBcisIKUuSpoXkhRybwPWGZpzrErIN5bnW2lppOV-g22nuePDXALFXjYsG6lp7aIeoWEryVArO0hEVE2pCG2OAUnXBNTrsFSXqIFZt1SRWHcSqSewYuzluGDYN2L_Qr8kRuJ8AGP_cOQgq_mgC6wKYXtnW_b_hG32HjLw</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>Zhang, Chong</creator><creator>Rees, Robert M.</creator><creator>Ju, Xiaotang</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-9500</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture</title><author>Zhang, Chong ; Rees, Robert M. ; Ju, Xiaotang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>15N labelling</topic><topic>Cropping system design</topic><topic>Fate of fertilizer N</topic><topic>Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency (FNUE)</topic><topic>Groundwater use efficiency</topic><topic>Intensive agriculture</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rees, Robert M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ju, Xiaotang</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Chong</au><au>Rees, Robert M.</au><au>Ju, Xiaotang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>280</volume><spage>116967</spage><epage>116967</epage><pages>116967-116967</pages><artnum>116967</artnum><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>New agronomic and management approaches are urgently required to meet the challenges of improving resource use efficiency and crop yields in intensive agricultural systems. Here we report the fertilizer N use efficiency (FNUE), fate of fertilizer N and N budgets in newly designed cropping systems as compared with conventional winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (Con. W/M) in the North China Plain. A15N labelling approach was used to quantify FNUE by these new cropping systems which included optimized winter wheat-summer maize (Opt. W/M) with two harvests in one year; winter wheat/summer maize-spring maize (W/M-M) and winter wheat/summer soybean-spring maize (W/S-M) with three harvests in two years, and spring maize (M) with one harvest in one year. The results showed that only 18–20% of fertilizer N was recovered by crops in Con. W/M. Although Opt. W/M significantly increased FNUE to 33%–35% with increased crop yields, it consumed as much groundwater as Con. W/M. The W/M-M, W/S-M and M significantly increased FNUE to 27%–44% and reduced groundwater use and fertilizer N losses when compared to Con. W/M. The W/M-M achieved a comparable grain yield, but W/S-M and M had significantly lower grain yields when compared to Con. W/M. However, grain N harvest in W/S-M was comparable with Con. W/M due to higher grain N content in soybean. Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake provided little contribution to total N uptake, and accounted for 5%, 12%, 7% and 2% of the average N uptake for winter wheat, spring maize, summer maize and summer soybean, respectively. When taking the second crop into account, Con. W/M recovered 27% of fertilizer N, while it increased to 36%–50% under the new cropping systems. We conclude that W/M-M and W/S-M will deliver significant improvements in the environmental footprints and sustainability of intensively managed cropping systems in the North China Plain. [Display omitted] •Conventional winter wheat-summer maize had a low N and water use efficiency and high fertilizer N losses.•Optimized winter wheat-summer maize increased grain yield and fertilizer N use efficiency but consumed large groundwater.•Post-anthesis fertilizer N uptake made little contribution to total crop N, even fertilizer was applied in later growth stage.•Winter wheat/summer maize (or soybean)-spring maize are alternative cropping systems for sustainable crop production.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33799128</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116967</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2593-9500</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2021-07, Vol.280, p.116967-116967, Article 116967
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2508564325
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects 15N labelling
Cropping system design
Fate of fertilizer N
Fertilizer nitrogen use efficiency (FNUE)
Groundwater use efficiency
Intensive agriculture
title Cropping system design can improve nitrogen use efficiency in intensively managed agriculture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A02%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cropping%20system%20design%20can%20improve%20nitrogen%20use%20efficiency%20in%20intensively%20managed%20agriculture&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Chong&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=280&rft.spage=116967&rft.epage=116967&rft.pages=116967-116967&rft.artnum=116967&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116967&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2508564325%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4182e830185124cbec1e908d400ff05596396185e3ab1733afe7b138aaadd6d33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2508564325&rft_id=info:pmid/33799128&rfr_iscdi=true