Loading…

Validation of the Delirium Diagnostic Tool-Provisional (DDT-Pro) in a skilled nursing facility and comparison to the 4 ‘A’s test (4AT)

To validate the Delirium Diagnostic Tool (DDT-Pro) in a SNF and compare its performance to the 4 A's Test (4AT) in real life conditions. Prospective cross-sectional study of 262 consecutively admitted adults to a SNF, independently assessed by psychiatrists using DSM-5 delirium criteria and by...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:General hospital psychiatry 2021-05, Vol.70, p.116-123
Main Authors: Sepúlveda, Esteban, Bermúdez, Ester, González, Dulce, Cotino, Paula, Viñuelas, Eva, Palma, José, Ciutat, Marta, Grau, Imma, Vilella, Elisabet, Trzepacz, Paula T., Franco, José G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:To validate the Delirium Diagnostic Tool (DDT-Pro) in a SNF and compare its performance to the 4 A's Test (4AT) in real life conditions. Prospective cross-sectional study of 262 consecutively admitted adults to a SNF, independently assessed by psychiatrists using DSM-5 delirium criteria and by geriatricians using the DDT-Pro (0–9 points) and 4AT (0–12 points). 141 (53.8%) participants had dementia and 79 (30.1%) had delirium. DDT-Pro and 4AT were moderately correlated (−0.59). Accuracies against DSM-5 diagnosis ranged from 80 to 85% and were comparable between tools regardless of dementia. Recommended delirium cutoff for the DDT-Pro (≤6) had 77.2% sensitivity, 84% specificity, and NPV = 89.5% and 4AT (≥4) had 54.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity, with lower specificity in the dementia subsample. DDT-Pro sensitivity increased (84.8%) at ≤7cutoff. Sensitivity and specificity of all DDT-Pro and 2/4 4AT items displayed gradients along severity levels, but two dichotomously rated 4AT items had low positivity. The tools had low concordance (p 
ISSN:0163-8343
1873-7714
DOI:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.03.010