The appropriateness of clinical decision support systems alerts in supporting clinical workflows: A systematic review

• Published in: Health informatics journal 2021-04, Vol.27 (2), p.14604582211007536-14604582211007536
• Main Authors: Olakotan, Olufisayo Olusegun, Mohd Yusof, Maryati
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical medicine; Decision support systems; Systematic review
• ISSN: 1460-4582; 1741-2811
• DOI: 10.1177/14604582211007536

A CDSS generates a high number of inappropriate alerts that interrupt the clinical workflow. As a result, clinicians silence, disable, or ignore alerts, thereby undermining patient safety. Therefore, the effectiveness and appropriateness of CDSS alerts need to be evaluated. A systematic review was carried out to identify the factors that affect CDSS alert appropriateness in supporting clinical workflow. Seven electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, ACM, Science Direct, IEEE, Ovid Medline, and Ebscohost) were searched for English language articles published between 1997 and 2018. Seventy six papers met the inclusion criteria, of which 26, 24, 15, and 11 papers are retrospective cohort, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies, respectively. The review highlights various factors influencing the appropriateness and efficiencies of CDSS alerts. These factors are categorized into technology, human, organization, and process aspects using a combination of approaches, including socio-technical framework, five rights of CDSS, and Lean. Most CDSS alerts were not properly designed based on human factor methods and principles, explaining high alert overrides in clinical practices. The identified factors and recommendations from the review may offer valuable insights into how CDSS alerts can be designed appropriately to support clinical workflow.