Loading…

The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study

Objective The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patient...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica 2021-10, Vol.144 (4), p.358-367
Main Authors: Marwaha, Steven, Hett, Danielle, Johnson, Sonia, Fowler, David, Hodgekins, Joanne, Freemantle, Nick, McCrone, Paul, Everard, Linda, Jones, Peter, Amos, Tim, Singh, Swaran, Sharma, Vimal, Birchwood, Max
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73
container_end_page 367
container_issue 4
container_start_page 358
container_title Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica
container_volume 144
creator Marwaha, Steven
Hett, Danielle
Johnson, Sonia
Fowler, David
Hodgekins, Joanne
Freemantle, Nick
McCrone, Paul
Everard, Linda
Jones, Peter
Amos, Tim
Singh, Swaran
Sharma, Vimal
Birchwood, Max
description Objective The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patients with and without manic symptoms? (2) Do manic symptoms in FEP have an impact on time to remission over 1 year? Methods We used data from the National EDEN study, a longitudinal cohort of patients with FEP accessing early intervention services (EIS) in England, which measured manic, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and functioning at service entry and 1 year. Data from 913 patients with FEP (639 without manic symptoms, 237 with manic symptoms) were analysed using both general linear modelling and survival analysis. Results Compared to FEP patients without manic symptoms, those with manic symptoms had a significantly longer DUI, though no difference in DUP. At baseline, people with manic symptoms had higher levels of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and worse functioning. At 12 months, people with manic symptoms had significantly poorer functioning and more positive psychotic symptoms. The presence of manic symptoms delayed time to remission over 1 year. There was a 19% reduced rate of remission for people with manic symptoms compared to those without. Conclusions Manic symptoms in FEP are associated with delays to treatment. This poorer trajectory persists over 1 year. They appear to be a vulnerable and under‐recognised group for poor outcome and need more focussed early intervention treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/acps.13307
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514607412</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2514607412</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IjQMWnTpONuGMcLigoquCuZXDTSNrWnRbrzEXxGn8SMM7pw4dkcDnx8nP9HaJeSIQ1zJFUNQ5okRKygAeWERIQxsYoGhBAa8RF53ECbAC_hTCnJ1tFGkmScxSkdIHX_bLAra6la7C0uZeUUhr6sW18CdhW2roH28_3D1A68NriGXj17cHCMT12lXfUE2Da-xG0QPVzia9k6X8kCT0-m1xjaTvfbaM3KAszOcm-hh9Pp_eQ8uro5u5iMryKVjBIRZTxVWs0Uo6m2OrNC8nTEjEzkLETjOmbcEpKlluuUSmm1tiITIzljXMZUi2QLHSy8deNfOwNtXjpQpihkZXwHeQjMOBGMxgHd_4O--K4Jb88pERMR83hOHS4o1XiAxti8blwpmz6nJJ9Xn8-rz7-rD_DeUtnNSqN_0Z-uA0AXwJsrTP-PKh9Pbu8W0i8RdY7v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572072622</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Marwaha, Steven ; Hett, Danielle ; Johnson, Sonia ; Fowler, David ; Hodgekins, Joanne ; Freemantle, Nick ; McCrone, Paul ; Everard, Linda ; Jones, Peter ; Amos, Tim ; Singh, Swaran ; Sharma, Vimal ; Birchwood, Max</creator><creatorcontrib>Marwaha, Steven ; Hett, Danielle ; Johnson, Sonia ; Fowler, David ; Hodgekins, Joanne ; Freemantle, Nick ; McCrone, Paul ; Everard, Linda ; Jones, Peter ; Amos, Tim ; Singh, Swaran ; Sharma, Vimal ; Birchwood, Max</creatorcontrib><description>Objective The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patients with and without manic symptoms? (2) Do manic symptoms in FEP have an impact on time to remission over 1 year? Methods We used data from the National EDEN study, a longitudinal cohort of patients with FEP accessing early intervention services (EIS) in England, which measured manic, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and functioning at service entry and 1 year. Data from 913 patients with FEP (639 without manic symptoms, 237 with manic symptoms) were analysed using both general linear modelling and survival analysis. Results Compared to FEP patients without manic symptoms, those with manic symptoms had a significantly longer DUI, though no difference in DUP. At baseline, people with manic symptoms had higher levels of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and worse functioning. At 12 months, people with manic symptoms had significantly poorer functioning and more positive psychotic symptoms. The presence of manic symptoms delayed time to remission over 1 year. There was a 19% reduced rate of remission for people with manic symptoms compared to those without. Conclusions Manic symptoms in FEP are associated with delays to treatment. This poorer trajectory persists over 1 year. They appear to be a vulnerable and under‐recognised group for poor outcome and need more focussed early intervention treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-690X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0447</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acps.13307</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33864251</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>affective psychosis ; Bipolar disorder ; duration of untreated illness ; duration of untreated psychosis ; Early intervention ; early intervention services ; first‐episode psychosis ; mania ; Patients ; Psychosis ; Remission ; Remission (Medicine) ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2021-10, Vol.144 (4), p.358-367</ispartof><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2021 John Wiley &amp; Sons A/S</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1575-5409</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33864251$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marwaha, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hett, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgekins, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freemantle, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrone, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everard, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vimal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchwood, Max</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study</title><title>Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychiatr Scand</addtitle><description>Objective The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patients with and without manic symptoms? (2) Do manic symptoms in FEP have an impact on time to remission over 1 year? Methods We used data from the National EDEN study, a longitudinal cohort of patients with FEP accessing early intervention services (EIS) in England, which measured manic, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and functioning at service entry and 1 year. Data from 913 patients with FEP (639 without manic symptoms, 237 with manic symptoms) were analysed using both general linear modelling and survival analysis. Results Compared to FEP patients without manic symptoms, those with manic symptoms had a significantly longer DUI, though no difference in DUP. At baseline, people with manic symptoms had higher levels of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and worse functioning. At 12 months, people with manic symptoms had significantly poorer functioning and more positive psychotic symptoms. The presence of manic symptoms delayed time to remission over 1 year. There was a 19% reduced rate of remission for people with manic symptoms compared to those without. Conclusions Manic symptoms in FEP are associated with delays to treatment. This poorer trajectory persists over 1 year. They appear to be a vulnerable and under‐recognised group for poor outcome and need more focussed early intervention treatment.</description><subject>affective psychosis</subject><subject>Bipolar disorder</subject><subject>duration of untreated illness</subject><subject>duration of untreated psychosis</subject><subject>Early intervention</subject><subject>early intervention services</subject><subject>first‐episode psychosis</subject><subject>mania</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychosis</subject><subject>Remission</subject><subject>Remission (Medicine)</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>0001-690X</issn><issn>1600-0447</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAE3IjQMWnTpONuGMcLigoquCuZXDTSNrWnRbrzEXxGn8SMM7pw4dkcDnx8nP9HaJeSIQ1zJFUNQ5okRKygAeWERIQxsYoGhBAa8RF53ECbAC_hTCnJ1tFGkmScxSkdIHX_bLAra6la7C0uZeUUhr6sW18CdhW2roH28_3D1A68NriGXj17cHCMT12lXfUE2Da-xG0QPVzia9k6X8kCT0-m1xjaTvfbaM3KAszOcm-hh9Pp_eQ8uro5u5iMryKVjBIRZTxVWs0Uo6m2OrNC8nTEjEzkLETjOmbcEpKlluuUSmm1tiITIzljXMZUi2QLHSy8deNfOwNtXjpQpihkZXwHeQjMOBGMxgHd_4O--K4Jb88pERMR83hOHS4o1XiAxti8blwpmz6nJJ9Xn8-rz7-rD_DeUtnNSqN_0Z-uA0AXwJsrTP-PKh9Pbu8W0i8RdY7v</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Marwaha, Steven</creator><creator>Hett, Danielle</creator><creator>Johnson, Sonia</creator><creator>Fowler, David</creator><creator>Hodgekins, Joanne</creator><creator>Freemantle, Nick</creator><creator>McCrone, Paul</creator><creator>Everard, Linda</creator><creator>Jones, Peter</creator><creator>Amos, Tim</creator><creator>Singh, Swaran</creator><creator>Sharma, Vimal</creator><creator>Birchwood, Max</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-5409</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study</title><author>Marwaha, Steven ; Hett, Danielle ; Johnson, Sonia ; Fowler, David ; Hodgekins, Joanne ; Freemantle, Nick ; McCrone, Paul ; Everard, Linda ; Jones, Peter ; Amos, Tim ; Singh, Swaran ; Sharma, Vimal ; Birchwood, Max</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>affective psychosis</topic><topic>Bipolar disorder</topic><topic>duration of untreated illness</topic><topic>duration of untreated psychosis</topic><topic>Early intervention</topic><topic>early intervention services</topic><topic>first‐episode psychosis</topic><topic>mania</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychosis</topic><topic>Remission</topic><topic>Remission (Medicine)</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marwaha, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hett, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgekins, Joanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freemantle, Nick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCrone, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Everard, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jones, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amos, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, Swaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Vimal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birchwood, Max</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marwaha, Steven</au><au>Hett, Danielle</au><au>Johnson, Sonia</au><au>Fowler, David</au><au>Hodgekins, Joanne</au><au>Freemantle, Nick</au><au>McCrone, Paul</au><au>Everard, Linda</au><au>Jones, Peter</au><au>Amos, Tim</au><au>Singh, Swaran</au><au>Sharma, Vimal</au><au>Birchwood, Max</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychiatr Scand</addtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>358</spage><epage>367</epage><pages>358-367</pages><issn>0001-690X</issn><eissn>1600-0447</eissn><abstract>Objective The extant literature is inconsistent over whether manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis (FEP) impact on its development and trajectory. This study addressed the following: (1) Does Duration of Untreated Illness (DUI) and Duration of Untreated Psychosis (DUP) differ between FEP patients with and without manic symptoms? (2) Do manic symptoms in FEP have an impact on time to remission over 1 year? Methods We used data from the National EDEN study, a longitudinal cohort of patients with FEP accessing early intervention services (EIS) in England, which measured manic, positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and functioning at service entry and 1 year. Data from 913 patients with FEP (639 without manic symptoms, 237 with manic symptoms) were analysed using both general linear modelling and survival analysis. Results Compared to FEP patients without manic symptoms, those with manic symptoms had a significantly longer DUI, though no difference in DUP. At baseline, people with manic symptoms had higher levels of positive and negative psychotic symptoms, depression and worse functioning. At 12 months, people with manic symptoms had significantly poorer functioning and more positive psychotic symptoms. The presence of manic symptoms delayed time to remission over 1 year. There was a 19% reduced rate of remission for people with manic symptoms compared to those without. Conclusions Manic symptoms in FEP are associated with delays to treatment. This poorer trajectory persists over 1 year. They appear to be a vulnerable and under‐recognised group for poor outcome and need more focussed early intervention treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>33864251</pmid><doi>10.1111/acps.13307</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1575-5409</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-690X
ispartof Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2021-10, Vol.144 (4), p.358-367
issn 0001-690X
1600-0447
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2514607412
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects affective psychosis
Bipolar disorder
duration of untreated illness
duration of untreated psychosis
Early intervention
early intervention services
first‐episode psychosis
mania
Patients
Psychosis
Remission
Remission (Medicine)
Survival analysis
title The impact of manic symptoms in first‐episode psychosis: Findings from the UK National EDEN study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A20%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20manic%20symptoms%20in%20first%E2%80%90episode%20psychosis:%20Findings%20from%20the%20UK%20National%20EDEN%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychiatrica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Marwaha,%20Steven&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=358&rft.epage=367&rft.pages=358-367&rft.issn=0001-690X&rft.eissn=1600-0447&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acps.13307&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2514607412%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3937-865cdcbc415dfd8f7a6594ea3ab3076d246f0085f6d51aafddf7879ab46a21d73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572072622&rft_id=info:pmid/33864251&rfr_iscdi=true