Loading…

Greenhouse gas fluxes from turfgrass systems: Species, growth rate, clipping management, and environmental effects

Turfgrass systems can be an important source or sink for greenhouse gases (GHG), including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). Further research is required in turfgrass systems; therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the effects of turfgrass species, growth rate, clippi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental quality 2021-05, Vol.50 (3), p.547-557
Main Authors: Law, Quincy D., Trappe, Jon M., Braun, Ross C., Patton, Aaron J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Turfgrass systems can be an important source or sink for greenhouse gases (GHG), including carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4). Further research is required in turfgrass systems; therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the effects of turfgrass species, growth rate, clipping management, and environmental conditions on GHG emissions. Greenhouse gas fluxes were measured in two separate field experiments in West Lafayette, IN. Experiment 1 investigated GHG flux in three cool‐season (C3) and two warm‐season (C4) turfgrass species during two growing seasons. Experiment 2 investigated fluxes in two C3 cultivars with varying growth rates and under different clipping management regimes. The C3 turfgrasses had the highest mean CO2 flux rates ranging from 0.373 to 0.431 g CO2‐C m−2 h−1 compared with 0.273 to 0.361 g CO2‐C m−2 h−1 for C4 turfgrasses. Mean hourly N2O flux rates ranged from 43.3 to 50.9 μg N2O‐N m−2 h−1 for C3 compared with 11.1 to 14.4 μg N2O‐N m−2 h−1 for C4 turfgrasses. Methane flux was more variable across time, but overall C4 turfgrasses were more likely to be a CH4 source, whereas C3 turfgrasses were often a CH4 sink. Growth rate and grass clipping management treatments had negligible impact on measured GHG flux. The differences in management practices specific to C3 and C4 turfgrasses had the largest impact on GHG flux. Results indicate the impact and importance of turfgrass species selection on GHG flux and also provide more information on our overall understanding on carbon and nitrogen cycling in urban soils. Core Ideas Turfgrass systems can be either a source or a sink for greenhouse gases. Further research is required on the effects of turfgrass species, growth rate, and clipping management. Higher CO2 and N2O fluxes occurred in C3 turfgrasses compared with C4 turfgrasses. Management factors specific to C3 or C4 turfgrasses had the largest impact on GHG flux. Growth rate and grass clipping management had negligible impact on GHG flux.
ISSN:0047-2425
1537-2537
DOI:10.1002/jeq2.20222