Loading…
Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid
Accurate appraisal of student performance during and after training is important for the proper functioning of the training system and realization of training goals. Training systems-and particularly flight training programs-rely heavily on expert assessors′ determination of student proficiency. Res...
Saved in:
Published in: | Human factors 1991-06, Vol.33 (3), p.293-308 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3 |
container_end_page | 308 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Human factors |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | McDaniel, William C. Rankin, William C. |
description | Accurate appraisal of student performance during and after training is important for the proper functioning of the training system and realization of training goals. Training systems-and particularly flight training programs-rely heavily on expert assessors′ determination of student proficiency. Research is needed that will lead to improvements in the reliability and accuracy of these assessments. Recent research in decision making suggests that errors are frequently introduced because of the limited capabilities of people to integrate information and reach accurate conclusions. Mathematical decision aids appear to be helpful in reducing these errors. A decision aid using Wald's binomial probability ratio test and the sequential examination of student task performances was adapted to a training application. The decision aid required significantly less task trial information and predicted subsequent task performance more accurately than did expert assessors using the current assessment method. When students performed inconsistently and below the required flight task standards, instructors were more willing to declare proficiency than was the decision aid. This finding was especially apparent on the more difficult flight tasks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/001872089103300305 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25180562</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_001872089103300305</sage_id><sourcerecordid>25180562</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFNA8bY6s8nuJt5Ka1WoKFjPS8xm29T9qMn20H9vSouIop6Gged9hpkh5BThEjHLrgBQZDEIicAYAINkj_Qw4VkkUOA-6W2AaEMckiPvFwCQSpb0yGRkOuNq29hmRseVnc07OlX-jT65trTamkavaVvS525VmKbz13RAH1Q3N7XqrFYVHRltvW0bOrDFMTkoVeXNya72ycv4Zjq8iyaPt_fDwSTSnMVdJJQyPE0LlBoBZWbKRL-mmqnQ8UJnMmOZ4ACJBMEFZ1qhkSgSEMqwMlasTy623qVr31fGd3ltvTZVpRrTrnweJyggSeN_QUyZZEEdwLNv4KJduSYskaNMBabI478phkEjRMwCFW8p7VrvnSnzpbO1cuscId98K__5rRA636mVD2ctnWrCXT-TXHKJbOO-2mJezcyX6b-LPwBDeJ0z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1311838823</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid</title><source>SAGE Deep Backfile 2012</source><creator>McDaniel, William C. ; Rankin, William C.</creator><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, William C. ; Rankin, William C.</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate appraisal of student performance during and after training is important for the proper functioning of the training system and realization of training goals. Training systems-and particularly flight training programs-rely heavily on expert assessors′ determination of student proficiency. Research is needed that will lead to improvements in the reliability and accuracy of these assessments. Recent research in decision making suggests that errors are frequently introduced because of the limited capabilities of people to integrate information and reach accurate conclusions. Mathematical decision aids appear to be helpful in reducing these errors. A decision aid using Wald's binomial probability ratio test and the sequential examination of student task performances was adapted to a training application. The decision aid required significantly less task trial information and predicted subsequent task performance more accurately than did expert assessors using the current assessment method. When students performed inconsistently and below the required flight task standards, instructors were more willing to declare proficiency than was the decision aid. This finding was especially apparent on the more difficult flight tasks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-7208</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-8181</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/001872089103300305</identifier><identifier>CODEN: HUFAA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Decision making ; Ergonomics. Human factors ; Flight ; Flight training ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Human-computer interaction ; Information processing ; Mathematical analysis ; Occupational psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Reliability analysis ; Students ; Teachers ; Training</subject><ispartof>Human factors, 1991-06, Vol.33 (3), p.293-308</ispartof><rights>1992 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Jun 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/001872089103300305$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001872089103300305$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21845,27924,27925,45082,45470</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4949133$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, William C.</creatorcontrib><title>Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid</title><title>Human factors</title><description>Accurate appraisal of student performance during and after training is important for the proper functioning of the training system and realization of training goals. Training systems-and particularly flight training programs-rely heavily on expert assessors′ determination of student proficiency. Research is needed that will lead to improvements in the reliability and accuracy of these assessments. Recent research in decision making suggests that errors are frequently introduced because of the limited capabilities of people to integrate information and reach accurate conclusions. Mathematical decision aids appear to be helpful in reducing these errors. A decision aid using Wald's binomial probability ratio test and the sequential examination of student task performances was adapted to a training application. The decision aid required significantly less task trial information and predicted subsequent task performance more accurately than did expert assessors using the current assessment method. When students performed inconsistently and below the required flight task standards, instructors were more willing to declare proficiency than was the decision aid. This finding was especially apparent on the more difficult flight tasks.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Human factors</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Flight training</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Human-computer interaction</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Occupational psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>0018-7208</issn><issn>1547-8181</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LAzEQhoMoWKt_wFNA8bY6s8nuJt5Ka1WoKFjPS8xm29T9qMn20H9vSouIop6Gged9hpkh5BThEjHLrgBQZDEIicAYAINkj_Qw4VkkUOA-6W2AaEMckiPvFwCQSpb0yGRkOuNq29hmRseVnc07OlX-jT65trTamkavaVvS525VmKbz13RAH1Q3N7XqrFYVHRltvW0bOrDFMTkoVeXNya72ycv4Zjq8iyaPt_fDwSTSnMVdJJQyPE0LlBoBZWbKRL-mmqnQ8UJnMmOZ4ACJBMEFZ1qhkSgSEMqwMlasTy623qVr31fGd3ltvTZVpRrTrnweJyggSeN_QUyZZEEdwLNv4KJduSYskaNMBabI478phkEjRMwCFW8p7VrvnSnzpbO1cuscId98K__5rRA636mVD2ctnWrCXT-TXHKJbOO-2mJezcyX6b-LPwBDeJ0z</recordid><startdate>19910601</startdate><enddate>19910601</enddate><creator>McDaniel, William C.</creator><creator>Rankin, William C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</general><general>Human Factors Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JRZRW</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910601</creationdate><title>Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid</title><author>McDaniel, William C. ; Rankin, William C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Human factors</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Flight training</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Human-computer interaction</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Occupational psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McDaniel, William C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, William C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 35</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McDaniel, William C.</au><au>Rankin, William C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid</atitle><jtitle>Human factors</jtitle><date>1991-06-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>308</epage><pages>293-308</pages><issn>0018-7208</issn><eissn>1547-8181</eissn><coden>HUFAA6</coden><abstract>Accurate appraisal of student performance during and after training is important for the proper functioning of the training system and realization of training goals. Training systems-and particularly flight training programs-rely heavily on expert assessors′ determination of student proficiency. Research is needed that will lead to improvements in the reliability and accuracy of these assessments. Recent research in decision making suggests that errors are frequently introduced because of the limited capabilities of people to integrate information and reach accurate conclusions. Mathematical decision aids appear to be helpful in reducing these errors. A decision aid using Wald's binomial probability ratio test and the sequential examination of student task performances was adapted to a training application. The decision aid required significantly less task trial information and predicted subsequent task performance more accurately than did expert assessors using the current assessment method. When students performed inconsistently and below the required flight task standards, instructors were more willing to declare proficiency than was the decision aid. This finding was especially apparent on the more difficult flight tasks.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/001872089103300305</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-7208 |
ispartof | Human factors, 1991-06, Vol.33 (3), p.293-308 |
issn | 0018-7208 1547-8181 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_25180562 |
source | SAGE Deep Backfile 2012 |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Decision making Ergonomics. Human factors Flight Flight training Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Human-computer interaction Information processing Mathematical analysis Occupational psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Reliability analysis Students Teachers Training |
title | Determining Flight Task Proficiency of Students: A Mathematical Decision Aid |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T18%3A48%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determining%20Flight%20Task%20Proficiency%20of%20Students:%20A%20Mathematical%20Decision%20Aid&rft.jtitle=Human%20factors&rft.au=McDaniel,%20William%20C.&rft.date=1991-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=308&rft.pages=293-308&rft.issn=0018-7208&rft.eissn=1547-8181&rft.coden=HUFAA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/001872089103300305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E25180562%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-8aae466d19c10197ef5cb6c3a1014dc79737840059084843ca1e918508ae3f2a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1311838823&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_001872089103300305&rfr_iscdi=true |