Loading…

Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions

Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The spine journal 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429
Main Authors: Sciubba, Daniel M., Pennington, Zach, Colman, Matthew W., Goodwin, C. Rory, Laufer, Ilya, Patt, Joshua C., Redmond, Kristin J., Saylor, Philip, Shin, John H., Schwab, Joseph H., Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3
container_end_page 1429
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1414
container_title The spine journal
container_volume 21
creator Sciubba, Daniel M.
Pennington, Zach
Colman, Matthew W.
Goodwin, C. Rory
Laufer, Ilya
Patt, Joshua C.
Redmond, Kristin J.
Saylor, Philip
Shin, John H.
Schwab, Joseph H.
Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
description Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943021001959</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518546352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0Ry9NKaz6b1IMjiFyx48OMa0nSCXXbbNUkV_71ZuutRCEwYnnmHeRA6pySnhBZXyzxs2g4gZ4TRnIicUHaAprRUZUYLzg7TX7IqqwQnE3QSwpIQUirKjtGE87JUQoopen9JIWaF1xBNSA8C3uZdY4M9fLXwjXuH4wdgO3gPXcQJirBvGh-x6Rrshjh4wE3rwca278IpOnJmFeBsV2fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnua3i8zygsWsFko1xoAlEijUhSTOcqUq1wgqKgW0YpRADU5SzpRzgrPCNUwaqAhY5vgMXY65G99_DhCiXrfBwmplOuiHoJmkpRQFlyyhYkSt70Pw4PTGt2vjfzQlemtUL_VoVG8NaCJ0MprGLnYbhnoNzd_QXmECbkYA0p3JmNfBttBZGG3opm__3_ALuNaIxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518546352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J. ; for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee ; NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><description>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33887454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Cement augmentation ; Chemotherapy ; Decision making ; Immunotherapy ; MIS ; Prediction models ; Prognostic tools ; Radiation therapy ; SBRT ; Separation surgery ; Spinal metastases ; Spine surgery</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8012-860X ; 0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmond, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Cement augmentation</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>MIS</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prognostic tools</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>SBRT</subject><subject>Separation surgery</subject><subject>Spinal metastases</subject><subject>Spine surgery</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0Ry9NKaz6b1IMjiFyx48OMa0nSCXXbbNUkV_71ZuutRCEwYnnmHeRA6pySnhBZXyzxs2g4gZ4TRnIicUHaAprRUZUYLzg7TX7IqqwQnE3QSwpIQUirKjtGE87JUQoopen9JIWaF1xBNSA8C3uZdY4M9fLXwjXuH4wdgO3gPXcQJirBvGh-x6Rrshjh4wE3rwca278IpOnJmFeBsV2fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnua3i8zygsWsFko1xoAlEijUhSTOcqUq1wgqKgW0YpRADU5SzpRzgrPCNUwaqAhY5vgMXY65G99_DhCiXrfBwmplOuiHoJmkpRQFlyyhYkSt70Pw4PTGt2vjfzQlemtUL_VoVG8NaCJ0MprGLnYbhnoNzd_QXmECbkYA0p3JmNfBttBZGG3opm__3_ALuNaIxw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Pennington, Zach</creator><creator>Colman, Matthew W.</creator><creator>Goodwin, C. Rory</creator><creator>Laufer, Ilya</creator><creator>Patt, Joshua C.</creator><creator>Redmond, Kristin J.</creator><creator>Saylor, Philip</creator><creator>Shin, John H.</creator><creator>Schwab, Joseph H.</creator><creator>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><author>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Cement augmentation</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>MIS</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prognostic tools</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>SBRT</topic><topic>Separation surgery</topic><topic>Spinal metastases</topic><topic>Spine surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmond, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sciubba, Daniel M.</au><au>Pennington, Zach</au><au>Colman, Matthew W.</au><au>Goodwin, C. Rory</au><au>Laufer, Ilya</au><au>Patt, Joshua C.</au><au>Redmond, Kristin J.</au><au>Saylor, Philip</au><au>Shin, John H.</au><au>Schwab, Joseph H.</au><au>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</au><aucorp>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</aucorp><aucorp>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1429</epage><pages>1414-1429</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33887454</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1529-9430
ispartof The spine journal, 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429
issn 1529-9430
1878-1632
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546352
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Ablation
Cement augmentation
Chemotherapy
Decision making
Immunotherapy
MIS
Prediction models
Prognostic tools
Radiation therapy
SBRT
Separation surgery
Spinal metastases
Spine surgery
title Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A43%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20metastases%202021:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20current%20state%20of%20the%20art%20and%20future%20directions&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Sciubba,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20NASS%20Spine%20Oncology%20Committee&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1429&rft.pages=1414-1429&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518546352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518546352&rft_id=info:pmid/33887454&rfr_iscdi=true