Loading…
Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions
Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there...
Saved in:
Published in: | The spine journal 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3 |
container_end_page | 1429 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1414 |
container_title | The spine journal |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Sciubba, Daniel M. Pennington, Zach Colman, Matthew W. Goodwin, C. Rory Laufer, Ilya Patt, Joshua C. Redmond, Kristin J. Saylor, Philip Shin, John H. Schwab, Joseph H. Schoenfeld, Andrew J. |
description | Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1529943021001959</els_id><sourcerecordid>2518546352</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0Ry9NKaz6b1IMjiFyx48OMa0nSCXXbbNUkV_71ZuutRCEwYnnmHeRA6pySnhBZXyzxs2g4gZ4TRnIicUHaAprRUZUYLzg7TX7IqqwQnE3QSwpIQUirKjtGE87JUQoopen9JIWaF1xBNSA8C3uZdY4M9fLXwjXuH4wdgO3gPXcQJirBvGh-x6Rrshjh4wE3rwca278IpOnJmFeBsV2fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnua3i8zygsWsFko1xoAlEijUhSTOcqUq1wgqKgW0YpRADU5SzpRzgrPCNUwaqAhY5vgMXY65G99_DhCiXrfBwmplOuiHoJmkpRQFlyyhYkSt70Pw4PTGt2vjfzQlemtUL_VoVG8NaCJ0MprGLnYbhnoNzd_QXmECbkYA0p3JmNfBttBZGG3opm__3_ALuNaIxw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2518546352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J. ; for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee ; NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><description>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1529-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1632</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33887454</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Ablation ; Cement augmentation ; Chemotherapy ; Decision making ; Immunotherapy ; MIS ; Prediction models ; Prognostic tools ; Radiation therapy ; SBRT ; Separation surgery ; Spinal metastases ; Spine surgery</subject><ispartof>The spine journal, 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8012-860X ; 0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33887454$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmond, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><title>The spine journal</title><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><description>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</description><subject>Ablation</subject><subject>Cement augmentation</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>MIS</subject><subject>Prediction models</subject><subject>Prognostic tools</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>SBRT</subject><subject>Separation surgery</subject><subject>Spinal metastases</subject><subject>Spine surgery</subject><issn>1529-9430</issn><issn>1878-1632</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMo7rr6D0Ry9NKaz6b1IMjiFyx48OMa0nSCXXbbNUkV_71ZuutRCEwYnnmHeRA6pySnhBZXyzxs2g4gZ4TRnIicUHaAprRUZUYLzg7TX7IqqwQnE3QSwpIQUirKjtGE87JUQoopen9JIWaF1xBNSA8C3uZdY4M9fLXwjXuH4wdgO3gPXcQJirBvGh-x6Rrshjh4wE3rwca278IpOnJmFeBsV2fo7f7udf6YLZ4fnua3i8zygsWsFko1xoAlEijUhSTOcqUq1wgqKgW0YpRADU5SzpRzgrPCNUwaqAhY5vgMXY65G99_DhCiXrfBwmplOuiHoJmkpRQFlyyhYkSt70Pw4PTGt2vjfzQlemtUL_VoVG8NaCJ0MprGLnYbhnoNzd_QXmECbkYA0p3JmNfBttBZGG3opm__3_ALuNaIxw</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creator><creator>Pennington, Zach</creator><creator>Colman, Matthew W.</creator><creator>Goodwin, C. Rory</creator><creator>Laufer, Ilya</creator><creator>Patt, Joshua C.</creator><creator>Redmond, Kristin J.</creator><creator>Saylor, Philip</creator><creator>Shin, John H.</creator><creator>Schwab, Joseph H.</creator><creator>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</title><author>Sciubba, Daniel M. ; Pennington, Zach ; Colman, Matthew W. ; Goodwin, C. Rory ; Laufer, Ilya ; Patt, Joshua C. ; Redmond, Kristin J. ; Saylor, Philip ; Shin, John H. ; Schwab, Joseph H. ; Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ablation</topic><topic>Cement augmentation</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>MIS</topic><topic>Prediction models</topic><topic>Prognostic tools</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>SBRT</topic><topic>Separation surgery</topic><topic>Spinal metastases</topic><topic>Spine surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sciubba, Daniel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennington, Zach</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colman, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, C. Rory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Ilya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patt, Joshua C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redmond, Kristin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saylor, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwab, Joseph H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sciubba, Daniel M.</au><au>Pennington, Zach</au><au>Colman, Matthew W.</au><au>Goodwin, C. Rory</au><au>Laufer, Ilya</au><au>Patt, Joshua C.</au><au>Redmond, Kristin J.</au><au>Saylor, Philip</au><au>Shin, John H.</au><au>Schwab, Joseph H.</au><au>Schoenfeld, Andrew J.</au><aucorp>for the NASS Spine Oncology Committee</aucorp><aucorp>NASS Spine Oncology Committee</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions</atitle><jtitle>The spine journal</jtitle><addtitle>Spine J</addtitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1414</spage><epage>1429</epage><pages>1414-1429</pages><issn>1529-9430</issn><eissn>1878-1632</eissn><abstract>Spinal metastases are an increasing societal health burden secondary to improvements in systemic therapy. Estimates indicate that 100,000 or more people have symptomatic spine metastases requiring management. While open surgery and external beam radiotherapy have been the pillars of treatment, there is growing interest in more minimally invasive technologies (eg separation surgery) and non-operative interventions (eg percutaneous cementoplasty, stereotactic radiosurgery). The great expansion of these alternatives to open surgery and the prevalence of adjuvant therapeutic options means that treatment decision making is now complex and reliant upon multidisciplinary collaboration. To help facilitate construction of care plans that meet patient goals and expectations, clinical decision aids and prognostic scores have been developed. These have been shown to have superior predictive value relative to more classic prediction models and may become an increasingly important aspect of the clinical practice of spinal oncology. Here we overview current therapeutic advances in the management of spine metastases and highlight emerging areas for research. Given the rapid advancements in surgical technologies and adjuvants, the field is likely to undergo further transformative changes in the coming decade.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>33887454</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8012-860X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4849-3695</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1529-9430 |
ispartof | The spine journal, 2021-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1414-1429 |
issn | 1529-9430 1878-1632 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2518546352 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Ablation Cement augmentation Chemotherapy Decision making Immunotherapy MIS Prediction models Prognostic tools Radiation therapy SBRT Separation surgery Spinal metastases Spine surgery |
title | Spinal metastases 2021: a review of the current state of the art and future directions |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T12%3A43%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20metastases%202021:%20a%20review%20of%20the%20current%20state%20of%20the%20art%20and%20future%20directions&rft.jtitle=The%20spine%20journal&rft.au=Sciubba,%20Daniel%20M.&rft.aucorp=for%20the%20NASS%20Spine%20Oncology%20Committee&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1414&rft.epage=1429&rft.pages=1414-1429&rft.issn=1529-9430&rft.eissn=1878-1632&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.04.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2518546352%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-b477daaec05e1eb650fc3779fd41497e19210ebef51327ff4326fd25ae90ec2f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2518546352&rft_id=info:pmid/33887454&rfr_iscdi=true |