“It's a Big Part of Being Good Surgeons”: Surgical Trainees’ Perceptions of Error Recovery in the Operating Room

• Published in: Journal of surgical education 2021-11, Vol.78 (6), p.2020-2029
• Main Authors: Gabrysz-Forget, Fanny, Zahabi, Sarah, Young, Meredith, Nepomnayshy, Dmitry, Nguyen, Lily HP
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Competence; error; error recovery; Humans; Internship and Residency; Medical Errors - prevention & control; Operating Rooms; safety; Surgeons; Surgical education; surgical training; United States
• ISSN: 1931-7204; 1878-7452
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.03.015

The burden of surgical error is high - errors threaten patient safety, lead to increased economic costs to society, and contribute to physician and resident burnout. To date, the majority of work has focused on strategies for reducing the incidence of surgical error, however, total error eradication remains unrealistic. Errors are, to some extent, unavoidable. Adequate preparation for practice should include optimal ways to manage and recover from errors; yet, these skills are rarely taught or assessed. This study aims to explore residents’ perceptions and experiences of surgical error recovery. More specifically, we documented participant definitions of error recovery, and explored factors that were perceived to influence error recovery experiences and training in the operating room. Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with residents and fellows in surgical specialties in Canada and the United States. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit residents and fellows in postgraduate year 1 to 5. Interviews were transcribed, analyzed and inductively coded. A total of 15 residents and fellows participated. When exploring the importance of error recovery for the trainees, competency and safety emerged as main themes, with error recovery being considered an indicator of overall surgical competency. Data concerning factors perceived to influence error recovery training were grouped under 4 major themes: (1) supervision (supervisor-related factors such as attending behaviors and reactions to errors), (2) self (factors such as self-assessed competency), (3) surgical context (factors related to the specific surgery or patient), and (4) situation safeness. Situational safeness was identified as a transversal theme describing factors to be considered when balancing between patient safety and the learning benefits of error recovery training. Error recovery was considered to be an important skill for safe surgical practice and was considered an important educational target for learners during surgical training. Trainees’ opportunities to learn to recover from technical errors in the OR are perceived to be influenced by several factors, leading to variable experiences and inconsistent opportunities to practice error recovery skills. Focusing on factors related to “supervision,” “self,” “surgery,” and “situational safeness” may be an initial framework on which to build initial educational interventions to suppor