Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases

Adsorption mechanisms of caffeine, quercetin, and phenol as test substances in various chromatographic systems have been analyzed. The investigations were conducted using three different chromatographic columns packed with polar bonded stationary phases, that is, amide, amine, and zwitterionic. Meth...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of separation science 2021-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2577-2586
Main Authors: Ziobrowski, Piotr, Chutkowski, Marcin, Przywara, Mateusz, Zapała, Lidia, Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata, Zapała, Wojciech
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acetonitrile
Adsorption
Caffeine
Chromatography
energetic heterogeneity
Energy distribution
isotherm
Phases
Scatchard curves
Scatchard plot
Zwitterions
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793
container_end_page 2586
container_issue 13
container_start_page 2577
container_title Journal of separation science
container_volume 44
creator Ziobrowski, Piotr
Chutkowski, Marcin
Przywara, Mateusz
Zapała, Lidia
Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata
Zapała, Wojciech
description Adsorption mechanisms of caffeine, quercetin, and phenol as test substances in various chromatographic systems have been analyzed. The investigations were conducted using three different chromatographic columns packed with polar bonded stationary phases, that is, amide, amine, and zwitterionic. Methanol–water and acetonitrile–water systems with different organic solvent contents have been used as mobile phases. On the basis of adsorption isotherms obtained for the tested systems, Scatchard plots and adsorption energy distributions have been determined. The most likely retention mechanisms have been discussed. The results of investigations indicate that (i) the surfaces of tested adsorbents are energetically heterogeneous, and (ii) the main role in sorption mechanism is played by low‐energy sites.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jssc.202100160
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2519806008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2549034838</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERX9gyxJZYsOCGRw7P_ayGvGrSl0U1pFjXzceJXHwTVSFFY_AC_ByPEmdTpkFG-TFsa--c6TrQ8jLjG0zxvi7PaLZcsbTIyvZE3KWlVmxUSLLnx7vrDwl54j7hFRSsWfkVAjFlCrYGfl9OehuQY80OKothjhOPgwUBoi3C7Uep-ib-WHmB4rQgZnA0naxMYyt77z58_OXHyaI2jxQpo2h11O4jXpsF4oLTtAjvfNTS3XvLbxdZVhlsPRHmidvMnpDcdJrhI4LHVuNgM_JidMdwotHvSDfPrz_uvu0ubr--Hl3ebUxopR8ozIjdGMAOIBLezWykpY5bYsmHelkk5daWGcM5xryxjSucFBWBTPGukqJC_LmkDvG8H0GnOreo4Gu0wOEGWteZEqykjGZ0Nf_oPswx_SJK5UrJnIpVmp7oEwMiBFcPUbfp8XqjNVrcfVaXH0sLhlePcbOTQ_2iP9tKgH5AbjzHSz_iau_3NzsKl5wcQ_xlKtt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2549034838</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Ziobrowski, Piotr ; Chutkowski, Marcin ; Przywara, Mateusz ; Zapała, Lidia ; Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata ; Zapała, Wojciech</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziobrowski, Piotr ; Chutkowski, Marcin ; Przywara, Mateusz ; Zapała, Lidia ; Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata ; Zapała, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><description>Adsorption mechanisms of caffeine, quercetin, and phenol as test substances in various chromatographic systems have been analyzed. The investigations were conducted using three different chromatographic columns packed with polar bonded stationary phases, that is, amide, amine, and zwitterionic. Methanol–water and acetonitrile–water systems with different organic solvent contents have been used as mobile phases. On the basis of adsorption isotherms obtained for the tested systems, Scatchard plots and adsorption energy distributions have been determined. The most likely retention mechanisms have been discussed. The results of investigations indicate that (i) the surfaces of tested adsorbents are energetically heterogeneous, and (ii) the main role in sorption mechanism is played by low‐energy sites.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-9306</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-9314</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jssc.202100160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33909950</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acetonitrile ; Adsorption ; Caffeine ; Chromatography ; energetic heterogeneity ; Energy distribution ; isotherm ; Phases ; Scatchard curves ; Scatchard plot ; Zwitterions</subject><ispartof>Journal of separation science, 2021-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2577-2586</ispartof><rights>2021 Wiley‐VCH GmbH</rights><rights>2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8225-7480 ; 0000-0001-8234-4963</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33909950$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziobrowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chutkowski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przywara, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapała, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapała, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases</title><title>Journal of separation science</title><addtitle>J Sep Sci</addtitle><description>Adsorption mechanisms of caffeine, quercetin, and phenol as test substances in various chromatographic systems have been analyzed. The investigations were conducted using three different chromatographic columns packed with polar bonded stationary phases, that is, amide, amine, and zwitterionic. Methanol–water and acetonitrile–water systems with different organic solvent contents have been used as mobile phases. On the basis of adsorption isotherms obtained for the tested systems, Scatchard plots and adsorption energy distributions have been determined. The most likely retention mechanisms have been discussed. The results of investigations indicate that (i) the surfaces of tested adsorbents are energetically heterogeneous, and (ii) the main role in sorption mechanism is played by low‐energy sites.</description><subject>Acetonitrile</subject><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Caffeine</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>energetic heterogeneity</subject><subject>Energy distribution</subject><subject>isotherm</subject><subject>Phases</subject><subject>Scatchard curves</subject><subject>Scatchard plot</subject><subject>Zwitterions</subject><issn>1615-9306</issn><issn>1615-9314</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc1u1DAUhS1ERX9gyxJZYsOCGRw7P_ayGvGrSl0U1pFjXzceJXHwTVSFFY_AC_ByPEmdTpkFG-TFsa--c6TrQ8jLjG0zxvi7PaLZcsbTIyvZE3KWlVmxUSLLnx7vrDwl54j7hFRSsWfkVAjFlCrYGfl9OehuQY80OKothjhOPgwUBoi3C7Uep-ib-WHmB4rQgZnA0naxMYyt77z58_OXHyaI2jxQpo2h11O4jXpsF4oLTtAjvfNTS3XvLbxdZVhlsPRHmidvMnpDcdJrhI4LHVuNgM_JidMdwotHvSDfPrz_uvu0ubr--Hl3ebUxopR8ozIjdGMAOIBLezWykpY5bYsmHelkk5daWGcM5xryxjSucFBWBTPGukqJC_LmkDvG8H0GnOreo4Gu0wOEGWteZEqykjGZ0Nf_oPswx_SJK5UrJnIpVmp7oEwMiBFcPUbfp8XqjNVrcfVaXH0sLhlePcbOTQ_2iP9tKgH5AbjzHSz_iau_3NzsKl5wcQ_xlKtt</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Ziobrowski, Piotr</creator><creator>Chutkowski, Marcin</creator><creator>Przywara, Mateusz</creator><creator>Zapała, Lidia</creator><creator>Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata</creator><creator>Zapała, Wojciech</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-7480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-4963</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases</title><author>Ziobrowski, Piotr ; Chutkowski, Marcin ; Przywara, Mateusz ; Zapała, Lidia ; Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata ; Zapała, Wojciech</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acetonitrile</topic><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Caffeine</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>energetic heterogeneity</topic><topic>Energy distribution</topic><topic>isotherm</topic><topic>Phases</topic><topic>Scatchard curves</topic><topic>Scatchard plot</topic><topic>Zwitterions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziobrowski, Piotr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chutkowski, Marcin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Przywara, Mateusz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapała, Lidia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zapała, Wojciech</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of separation science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziobrowski, Piotr</au><au>Chutkowski, Marcin</au><au>Przywara, Mateusz</au><au>Zapała, Lidia</au><au>Kosińska‐Pezda, Małgorzata</au><au>Zapała, Wojciech</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases</atitle><jtitle>Journal of separation science</jtitle><addtitle>J Sep Sci</addtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>2577</spage><epage>2586</epage><pages>2577-2586</pages><issn>1615-9306</issn><eissn>1615-9314</eissn><abstract>Adsorption mechanisms of caffeine, quercetin, and phenol as test substances in various chromatographic systems have been analyzed. The investigations were conducted using three different chromatographic columns packed with polar bonded stationary phases, that is, amide, amine, and zwitterionic. Methanol–water and acetonitrile–water systems with different organic solvent contents have been used as mobile phases. On the basis of adsorption isotherms obtained for the tested systems, Scatchard plots and adsorption energy distributions have been determined. The most likely retention mechanisms have been discussed. The results of investigations indicate that (i) the surfaces of tested adsorbents are energetically heterogeneous, and (ii) the main role in sorption mechanism is played by low‐energy sites.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>33909950</pmid><doi>10.1002/jssc.202100160</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8225-7480</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-4963</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-9306
ispartof Journal of separation science, 2021-07, Vol.44 (13), p.2577-2586
issn 1615-9306
1615-9314
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2519806008
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Acetonitrile
Adsorption
Caffeine
Chromatography
energetic heterogeneity
Energy distribution
isotherm
Phases
Scatchard curves
Scatchard plot
Zwitterions
title Analysis of adsorption energy distribution in selected hydrophilic‐interaction chromatography systems with amide, amine, and zwitterionic stationary phases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T12%3A20%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20adsorption%20energy%20distribution%20in%20selected%20hydrophilic%E2%80%90interaction%20chromatography%20systems%20with%20amide,%20amine,%20and%20zwitterionic%20stationary%20phases&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20separation%20science&rft.au=Ziobrowski,%20Piotr&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=2577&rft.epage=2586&rft.pages=2577-2586&rft.issn=1615-9306&rft.eissn=1615-9314&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jssc.202100160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2549034838%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3682-91c3abcee2eef995b878d0fad5b5b58f8b46a3dfcc22ae4bcbf5fe6750ccdf793%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2549034838&rft_id=info:pmid/33909950&rfr_iscdi=true