Loading…
Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool
ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2021-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1184-1190 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733 |
container_end_page | 1190 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1184 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Slater, Anthony Crosbie, Deanne Essenstam, Dionne Hoggard, Brett Holmes, Paul McEniery, Julie Thompson, Michelle |
description | ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.DesignProspective observational study.SettingRegional paediatric retrieval and transport services.PatientsData were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.InterventionImplementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.Main outcome measuresAccuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.ResultsA total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).ConclusionsThe triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318634 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520870738</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2520870738</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkc1P3DAQxS3UChbKv4AscekldOxJHLs3RPmohNRLe46c7IT1NrEXO6nEf4-3y0fVC-I00uj33jzNY4wLOBMC1Rcbu9XSpW7lhmUhQZgChVZY7rGFKJXOq7L8wBYAgIXRWh-ww5TWAEJqjfvsANGgQKMXzH6jziUXfDHa387f8T5E_tc3kueR7mcXt2vnJ4qrkDZusgOfovVpE-L0lduUKKWR_MRDzy334Q9tAWfviE8hDJ_Yx94OiY6f5hH7dXX58-KmuP1x_f3i_LZoS5RTgXVO1GujaKmtFdSioqoj6ARUuquxUhIqaKXtQVqlTN8KUIDUozSirBGP2Oed7yaG-5nS1Iz5QzQM1lOYUyMrCbqGGnVGT_9D12GOPqfLlDGZEMpkSu-oLoaUIvXNJrrRxodGQLOtofm3hmZbQ7OrIUtPng7M7UjLF-Hz3zOAO6Ad1--xLV9VL5HflD0CWNypJA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2599383169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool</title><source>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><creator>Slater, Anthony ; Crosbie, Deanne ; Essenstam, Dionne ; Hoggard, Brett ; Holmes, Paul ; McEniery, Julie ; Thompson, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Slater, Anthony ; Crosbie, Deanne ; Essenstam, Dionne ; Hoggard, Brett ; Holmes, Paul ; McEniery, Julie ; Thompson, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.DesignProspective observational study.SettingRegional paediatric retrieval and transport services.PatientsData were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.InterventionImplementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.Main outcome measuresAccuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.ResultsA total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).ConclusionsThe triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318634</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33931398</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Ambulance services ; Attrition (Research Studies) ; Child ; Child Health ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Children & youth ; Clinical decision making ; Continuity of care ; Coordination ; Critical care ; Critical Illness - therapy ; Decision Making ; Epidemiology ; Female ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric - organization & administration ; Male ; Medical referrals ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Mortality risk ; New South Wales ; Nurses ; Observational studies ; Original research ; Patient Transfer ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Physicians ; physiology ; Prospective Studies ; Referral ; Risk reduction ; Transportation of Patients ; Trauma ; Triage - methods ; Triage - organization & administration ; Vital signs</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2021-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1184-1190</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3127-1060</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2599383169/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2599383169?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21357,21373,27901,27902,33588,33589,33854,33855,43709,43856,74192,74367</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33931398$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slater, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Deanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essenstam, Dionne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoggard, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEniery, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.DesignProspective observational study.SettingRegional paediatric retrieval and transport services.PatientsData were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.InterventionImplementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.Main outcome measuresAccuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.ResultsA total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).ConclusionsThe triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team.</description><subject>Ambulance services</subject><subject>Attrition (Research Studies)</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Health</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Critical care</subject><subject>Critical Illness - therapy</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric - organization & administration</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical referrals</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Mortality risk</subject><subject>New South Wales</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Observational studies</subject><subject>Original research</subject><subject>Patient Transfer</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>physiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Referral</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Transportation of Patients</subject><subject>Trauma</subject><subject>Triage - methods</subject><subject>Triage - organization & administration</subject><subject>Vital signs</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkc1P3DAQxS3UChbKv4AscekldOxJHLs3RPmohNRLe46c7IT1NrEXO6nEf4-3y0fVC-I00uj33jzNY4wLOBMC1Rcbu9XSpW7lhmUhQZgChVZY7rGFKJXOq7L8wBYAgIXRWh-ww5TWAEJqjfvsANGgQKMXzH6jziUXfDHa387f8T5E_tc3kueR7mcXt2vnJ4qrkDZusgOfovVpE-L0lduUKKWR_MRDzy334Q9tAWfviE8hDJ_Yx94OiY6f5hH7dXX58-KmuP1x_f3i_LZoS5RTgXVO1GujaKmtFdSioqoj6ARUuquxUhIqaKXtQVqlTN8KUIDUozSirBGP2Oed7yaG-5nS1Iz5QzQM1lOYUyMrCbqGGnVGT_9D12GOPqfLlDGZEMpkSu-oLoaUIvXNJrrRxodGQLOtofm3hmZbQ7OrIUtPng7M7UjLF-Hz3zOAO6Ad1--xLV9VL5HflD0CWNypJA</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Slater, Anthony</creator><creator>Crosbie, Deanne</creator><creator>Essenstam, Dionne</creator><creator>Hoggard, Brett</creator><creator>Holmes, Paul</creator><creator>McEniery, Julie</creator><creator>Thompson, Michelle</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-1060</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool</title><author>Slater, Anthony ; Crosbie, Deanne ; Essenstam, Dionne ; Hoggard, Brett ; Holmes, Paul ; McEniery, Julie ; Thompson, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ambulance services</topic><topic>Attrition (Research Studies)</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Health</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Critical care</topic><topic>Critical Illness - therapy</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Pediatric - organization & administration</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical referrals</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Mortality risk</topic><topic>New South Wales</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Observational studies</topic><topic>Original research</topic><topic>Patient Transfer</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>physiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Referral</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Transportation of Patients</topic><topic>Trauma</topic><topic>Triage - methods</topic><topic>Triage - organization & administration</topic><topic>Vital signs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slater, Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosbie, Deanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Essenstam, Dionne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoggard, Brett</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holmes, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEniery, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Family Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slater, Anthony</au><au>Crosbie, Deanne</au><au>Essenstam, Dionne</au><au>Hoggard, Brett</au><au>Holmes, Paul</au><au>McEniery, Julie</au><au>Thompson, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><stitle>Arch Dis Child</stitle><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1184</spage><epage>1190</epage><pages>1184-1190</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><abstract>ObjectiveThe use of specialist retrieval teams to transport critically ill children is associated with reduced risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; however, there is a paucity of data to guide decision-making related to retrieval team activation. We aimed to assess the accuracy of a novel triage tool designed to identify critically ill children at the time of referral for interhospital transport.DesignProspective observational study.SettingRegional paediatric retrieval and transport services.PatientsData were collected for 1815 children referred consecutively for interhospital transport from 87 hospitals in Queensland and northern New South Wales.InterventionImplementation of the Queensland Paediatric Transport Triage Tool.Main outcome measuresAccuracy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value for predicting transport by a retrieval team, or admission to intensive care following transport.ResultsA total of 574 (32%) children were transported with a retrieval team. Prediction of retrieval (95% CIs): sensitivity 96.9% (95% CI 95.1% to 98.1%), specificity 91.4% (95% CI 89.7% to 92.9%), negative predictive value 98.4% (95% CI 97.5% to 99.1%). There were 412 (23%) children admitted to intensive care following transport. Prediction of intensive care admission: sensitivity 96.8% (95% CI 94.7% to 98.3%), specificity 81.2% (95% CI 79.0% to 83.2%), negative predictive value 98.9% (95% CI 98.1% to 99.4%).ConclusionsThe triage tool predicted the need for retrieval or intensive care admission with high sensitivity and specificity. The high negative predictive value indicates that, in our setting, children categorised as acutely ill rather than critically ill are generally suitable for interhospital transport without a retrieval team.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><pmid>33931398</pmid><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2019-318634</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3127-1060</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2021-12, Vol.106 (12), p.1184-1190 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2520870738 |
source | Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3) |
subjects | Ambulance services Attrition (Research Studies) Child Child Health Child, Preschool Children Children & youth Clinical decision making Continuity of care Coordination Critical care Critical Illness - therapy Decision Making Epidemiology Female Hospitals Humans Infant Intensive care Intensive Care Units, Pediatric - organization & administration Male Medical referrals Morbidity Mortality Mortality risk New South Wales Nurses Observational studies Original research Patient Transfer Patients Pediatrics Physicians physiology Prospective Studies Referral Risk reduction Transportation of Patients Trauma Triage - methods Triage - organization & administration Vital signs |
title | Decision-making for children requiring interhospital transport: assessment of a novel triage tool |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T23%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Decision-making%20for%20children%20requiring%20interhospital%20transport:%20assessment%20of%20a%20novel%20triage%20tool&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Slater,%20Anthony&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1184&rft.epage=1190&rft.pages=1184-1190&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2520870738%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b432t-37313f896ed8aa1eb36e5ce0c1058c73562050b2af02a669fb10603ef32914733%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2599383169&rft_id=info:pmid/33931398&rfr_iscdi=true |