Loading…

Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature

•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Vaccine 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964
Main Authors: Machado, Amanda Alberga, Edwards, Sarah A., Mueller, Melissa, Saini, Vineet
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3
container_end_page 2964
container_issue 22
container_start_page 2938
container_title Vaccine
container_volume 39
creator Machado, Amanda Alberga
Edwards, Sarah A.
Mueller, Melissa
Saini, Vineet
description •Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks. Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age. The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake. Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521499722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X21004047</els_id><sourcerecordid>2528799440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AsceGyi_9kNzYXVFWlIFXiAhI3yzueUK-SONhOqvKYPBETduHAhYttjX_fN2N_VfVC8I3gYvfmsJkdQBhwI7kUG642XOtH1UroRq3lVujH1YrLXb2uBf96Vp3nfOCcb5UwT6szpYxSSjSr6ud12yKUMCMLQ8E041BCHDIrkQqQ0GVkKU6FOjG4C52_i9Gz0PfTEH64hWUQZ0zu2-LAunjPcoQQEeIQ-wAsF1emTNBvSQmYF87jjF0c0dPFNJRE5bfskuWHXLAnW2AJ54D3zA2EJNKB65gbx-RCplNs2YiY1keKbLpA01OnhM-qJ63rMj4_7RfVl_fXn68-rG8_3Xy8urxdA72-0KqdF2BASwFatAp1a1pjdvudF35vpFfO1E4bJRvcIjR-740yHvZaqJaDuqheH33HFL9PmIvtQwbsOjdgnLKVWylqYxopCX31D3qIUxpouoXSjTF1zYnaHilIMeeErR1T6F16sILbJXR7sKfQ7RK65cpS6KR7eXKf9j36v6o_KRPw7gggfQf9V7IZAg6APiQK3_oY_tPiFzH5yC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528799440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><description>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks. Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age. The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake. Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33933317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Access ; Childhood ; Children ; Deprivation ; Developed countries ; Education ; Families &amp; family life ; Health disparities ; Health equity ; Immunization ; Incentives ; Influenza ; Intervention ; Language ; Parents ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Population ; Populations ; Precision public health ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Reviews ; Rural areas ; Search strategies ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Socioeconomics ; Synthesis ; Systematic review ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks. Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age. The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake. Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health equity</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Precision public health</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Search strategies</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AsceGyi_9kNzYXVFWlIFXiAhI3yzueUK-SONhOqvKYPBETduHAhYttjX_fN2N_VfVC8I3gYvfmsJkdQBhwI7kUG642XOtH1UroRq3lVujH1YrLXb2uBf96Vp3nfOCcb5UwT6szpYxSSjSr6ud12yKUMCMLQ8E041BCHDIrkQqQ0GVkKU6FOjG4C52_i9Gz0PfTEH64hWUQZ0zu2-LAunjPcoQQEeIQ-wAsF1emTNBvSQmYF87jjF0c0dPFNJRE5bfskuWHXLAnW2AJ54D3zA2EJNKB65gbx-RCplNs2YiY1keKbLpA01OnhM-qJ63rMj4_7RfVl_fXn68-rG8_3Xy8urxdA72-0KqdF2BASwFatAp1a1pjdvudF35vpFfO1E4bJRvcIjR-740yHvZaqJaDuqheH33HFL9PmIvtQwbsOjdgnLKVWylqYxopCX31D3qIUxpouoXSjTF1zYnaHilIMeeErR1T6F16sILbJXR7sKfQ7RK65cpS6KR7eXKf9j36v6o_KRPw7gggfQf9V7IZAg6APiQK3_oY_tPiFzH5yC4</recordid><startdate>20210521</startdate><enddate>20210521</enddate><creator>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creator><creator>Edwards, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Mueller, Melissa</creator><creator>Saini, Vineet</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210521</creationdate><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><author>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health equity</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Precision public health</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Search strategies</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado, Amanda Alberga</au><au>Edwards, Sarah A.</au><au>Mueller, Melissa</au><au>Saini, Vineet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2021-05-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2938</spage><epage>2964</epage><pages>2938-2964</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks. Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries. A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age. The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake. Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33933317</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0264-410X
ispartof Vaccine, 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964
issn 0264-410X
1873-2518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521499722
source Elsevier
subjects Access
Childhood
Children
Deprivation
Developed countries
Education
Families & family life
Health disparities
Health equity
Immunization
Incentives
Influenza
Intervention
Language
Parents
Parents & parenting
Population
Populations
Precision public health
Public health
Quality assessment
Quality control
Reviews
Rural areas
Search strategies
Socioeconomic factors
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomics
Synthesis
Systematic review
Vaccine hesitancy
Vaccines
title Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20interventions%20to%20increase%20routine%20childhood%20immunization%20coverage%20in%20low%20socioeconomic%20status%20communities%20in%20developed%20countries:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20peer-reviewed%20literature&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Machado,%20Amanda%20Alberga&rft.date=2021-05-21&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2938&rft.epage=2964&rft.pages=2938-2964&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528799440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528799440&rft_id=info:pmid/33933317&rfr_iscdi=true