Loading…
Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature
•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccine 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3 |
container_end_page | 2964 |
container_issue | 22 |
container_start_page | 2938 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Machado, Amanda Alberga Edwards, Sarah A. Mueller, Melissa Saini, Vineet |
description | •Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.
Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries.
A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age.
The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake.
Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521499722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264410X21004047</els_id><sourcerecordid>2528799440</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AsceGyi_9kNzYXVFWlIFXiAhI3yzueUK-SONhOqvKYPBETduHAhYttjX_fN2N_VfVC8I3gYvfmsJkdQBhwI7kUG642XOtH1UroRq3lVujH1YrLXb2uBf96Vp3nfOCcb5UwT6szpYxSSjSr6ud12yKUMCMLQ8E041BCHDIrkQqQ0GVkKU6FOjG4C52_i9Gz0PfTEH64hWUQZ0zu2-LAunjPcoQQEeIQ-wAsF1emTNBvSQmYF87jjF0c0dPFNJRE5bfskuWHXLAnW2AJ54D3zA2EJNKB65gbx-RCplNs2YiY1keKbLpA01OnhM-qJ63rMj4_7RfVl_fXn68-rG8_3Xy8urxdA72-0KqdF2BASwFatAp1a1pjdvudF35vpFfO1E4bJRvcIjR-740yHvZaqJaDuqheH33HFL9PmIvtQwbsOjdgnLKVWylqYxopCX31D3qIUxpouoXSjTF1zYnaHilIMeeErR1T6F16sILbJXR7sKfQ7RK65cpS6KR7eXKf9j36v6o_KRPw7gggfQf9V7IZAg6APiQK3_oY_tPiFzH5yC4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528799440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</creator><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><description>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.
Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries.
A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age.
The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake.
Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33933317</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Access ; Childhood ; Children ; Deprivation ; Developed countries ; Education ; Families & family life ; Health disparities ; Health equity ; Immunization ; Incentives ; Influenza ; Intervention ; Language ; Parents ; Parents & parenting ; Population ; Populations ; Precision public health ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Reviews ; Rural areas ; Search strategies ; Socioeconomic factors ; Socioeconomic status ; Socioeconomics ; Synthesis ; Systematic review ; Vaccine hesitancy ; Vaccines</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2021. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33933317$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.
Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries.
A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age.
The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake.
Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Childhood</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Deprivation</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health equity</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Influenza</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Parents</subject><subject>Parents & parenting</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Precision public health</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Search strategies</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Vaccine hesitancy</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkc9u1DAQxiMEotvCI4AsceGyi_9kNzYXVFWlIFXiAhI3yzueUK-SONhOqvKYPBETduHAhYttjX_fN2N_VfVC8I3gYvfmsJkdQBhwI7kUG642XOtH1UroRq3lVujH1YrLXb2uBf96Vp3nfOCcb5UwT6szpYxSSjSr6ud12yKUMCMLQ8E041BCHDIrkQqQ0GVkKU6FOjG4C52_i9Gz0PfTEH64hWUQZ0zu2-LAunjPcoQQEeIQ-wAsF1emTNBvSQmYF87jjF0c0dPFNJRE5bfskuWHXLAnW2AJ54D3zA2EJNKB65gbx-RCplNs2YiY1keKbLpA01OnhM-qJ63rMj4_7RfVl_fXn68-rG8_3Xy8urxdA72-0KqdF2BASwFatAp1a1pjdvudF35vpFfO1E4bJRvcIjR-740yHvZaqJaDuqheH33HFL9PmIvtQwbsOjdgnLKVWylqYxopCX31D3qIUxpouoXSjTF1zYnaHilIMeeErR1T6F16sILbJXR7sKfQ7RK65cpS6KR7eXKf9j36v6o_KRPw7gggfQf9V7IZAg6APiQK3_oY_tPiFzH5yC4</recordid><startdate>20210521</startdate><enddate>20210521</enddate><creator>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creator><creator>Edwards, Sarah A.</creator><creator>Mueller, Melissa</creator><creator>Saini, Vineet</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210521</creationdate><title>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</title><author>Machado, Amanda Alberga ; Edwards, Sarah A. ; Mueller, Melissa ; Saini, Vineet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Childhood</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Deprivation</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health equity</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Influenza</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Parents</topic><topic>Parents & parenting</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Precision public health</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Search strategies</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Vaccine hesitancy</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Machado, Amanda Alberga</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Sarah A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mueller, Melissa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, Vineet</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Machado, Amanda Alberga</au><au>Edwards, Sarah A.</au><au>Mueller, Melissa</au><au>Saini, Vineet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2021-05-21</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>2938</spage><epage>2964</epage><pages>2938-2964</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>•Most effective and strongly rated studies consisted of multi-component interventions.•Improving access to immunization services was deemed effective in strongly rated studies.•Updating contact information of low socioeconomic status parents and reminders improved immunization uptake.•Plain language communication with low socioeconomic status parents regarding immunization was effective.•Most low socioeconomic status parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.
Childhood immunization coverage rates are known to be disproportionate according to population’s socioeconomic status (SES). This systematic review examined and appraised quality of interventions deemed effective to increase routine childhood immunization uptake in low SES populations in developed countries.
A literature search was conducted using Medline, Embase, CINAHL, EBMR, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Health STAR. We systematically searched and critically appraised articles published between January 1990 and December 2019 using the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment tool. This systematic review provides a synthesis of the available evidence for childhood immunization interventions deemed effective for low SES parents or families of children ≤ 5 years of age.
The search yielded 3317 records, of which 2975 studies met the inclusion criteria. From the 100 relevant studies, a total of 40 were included. The majority of effective and strongly rated studies synthesized consisted of multi-component interventions. Such interventions addressed access, community-based mobilization, outreach, appointment reminders, education, clinical tracking and incentives, and were language and health literacy appropriate to support low SES parents. Improving access to low SES parents was deemed effective in the vast majority of strongly rated studies. Incorrect contact information of low SES parents due to increased social mobility (i.e. household moves) rendered reminders ineffective, and therefore, updating contact information should be pursued proactively by front-line healthcare providers. In addition, plain language communication with low SES parents regarding immunization was deemed effective in improving immunization uptake.
Comprehensive multi-component interventions including improved access, appointment reminders, education and precision health communication are effective for addressing health inequities in immunization coverage amongst marginalized populations. Most low SES parents still believe that the benefits of immunization outweigh the risks.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>33933317</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2021-05, Vol.39 (22), p.2938-2964 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2521499722 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Access Childhood Children Deprivation Developed countries Education Families & family life Health disparities Health equity Immunization Incentives Influenza Intervention Language Parents Parents & parenting Population Populations Precision public health Public health Quality assessment Quality control Reviews Rural areas Search strategies Socioeconomic factors Socioeconomic status Socioeconomics Synthesis Systematic review Vaccine hesitancy Vaccines |
title | Effective interventions to increase routine childhood immunization coverage in low socioeconomic status communities in developed countries: A systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed literature |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A54%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effective%20interventions%20to%20increase%20routine%20childhood%20immunization%20coverage%20in%20low%20socioeconomic%20status%20communities%20in%20developed%20countries:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20critical%20appraisal%20of%20peer-reviewed%20literature&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Machado,%20Amanda%20Alberga&rft.date=2021-05-21&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=2938&rft.epage=2964&rft.pages=2938-2964&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.088&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2528799440%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-c38ad1c9c821c81f3e8f9f996b6d1db92d3a94a89327e5ec7dbd939dcb813f0c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528799440&rft_id=info:pmid/33933317&rfr_iscdi=true |