Loading…

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study

A prospective multicenter study. To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes after open-door (OD) and double-door (DD) laminoplasties in subjects with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although previous studies compared clinical results after OD and DD laminoplas...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976) Pa. 1976), 2021-12, Vol.46 (23), p.E1238-E1245
Main Authors: Nagoshi, Narihito, Yoshii, Toshitaka, Egawa, Satoru, Sakai, Kenichiro, Kusano, Kazuo, Nakagawa, Yukihiro, Hirai, Takashi, Wada, Kanichiro, Katsumi, Keiichi, Fujii, Kengo, Kimura, Atsushi, Furuya, Takeo, Kanchiku, Tsukasa, Nagamoto, Yukitaka, Oshima, Yasushi, Nakashima, Hiroaki, Ando, Kei, Takahata, Masahiko, Mori, Kanji, Nakajima, Hideaki, Murata, Kazuma, Matsunaga, Shunji, Kaito, Takashi, Yamada, Kei, Kobayashi, Sho, Kato, Satoshi, Ohba, Tetsuro, Inami, Satoshi, Fujibayashi, Shunsuke, Katoh, Hiroyuki, Kanno, Haruo, Watanabe, Kota, Imagama, Shiro, Koda, Masao, Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu, Takeshita, Katsushi, Nakamura, Masaya, Matsumoto, Morio, Yamazaki, Masashi, Okawa, Atsushi
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-ab467d1cdf3ced0dadfacb8fb7dc5e88c2fce3884468f1711dfd35db8ad4947f3
container_end_page E1245
container_issue 23
container_start_page E1238
container_title Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)
container_volume 46
creator Nagoshi, Narihito
Yoshii, Toshitaka
Egawa, Satoru
Sakai, Kenichiro
Kusano, Kazuo
Nakagawa, Yukihiro
Hirai, Takashi
Wada, Kanichiro
Katsumi, Keiichi
Fujii, Kengo
Kimura, Atsushi
Furuya, Takeo
Kanchiku, Tsukasa
Nagamoto, Yukitaka
Oshima, Yasushi
Nakashima, Hiroaki
Ando, Kei
Takahata, Masahiko
Mori, Kanji
Nakajima, Hideaki
Murata, Kazuma
Matsunaga, Shunji
Kaito, Takashi
Yamada, Kei
Kobayashi, Sho
Kato, Satoshi
Ohba, Tetsuro
Inami, Satoshi
Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Kanno, Haruo
Watanabe, Kota
Imagama, Shiro
Koda, Masao
Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu
Takeshita, Katsushi
Nakamura, Masaya
Matsumoto, Morio
Yamazaki, Masashi
Okawa, Atsushi
description A prospective multicenter study. To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes after open-door (OD) and double-door (DD) laminoplasties in subjects with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although previous studies compared clinical results after OD and DD laminoplasties, they were performed at a single institution with a relatively small sample size targeting mixed pathologies, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of these, 41 and 164 patients received OD and DD laminoplasties, respectively. Demographic information, medical history, and imaging findings were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Age, sex, symptom duration, and comorbidities were not significantly different between the groups. Segmental ossification was the most frequent in both groups. No significant differences in K-line type, canal occupying ratio, C2-C7 angles, and range of motion (ROM) were found. Both procedures reduced the cervical ROM postoperatively. A comparable frequency of perioperative complications was observed between the groups. The cervical JOA scores showed a similar improvement at 2 years postoperatively. The reduction in VAS score for neck pain was favorable in the OD group (P = 0.02), while other pain assessments did not show any significant differences between the groups. The functional outcomes assessed using the JOACMEQ presented equivalent effective rates. The results demonstrated almost comparable surgical outcomes between OD and DD laminoplasties. Laminoplasty is a valuable technique as a therapeutic option for cervical OPLL.Level of Evidence: 5.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004094
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524356041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524356041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-ab467d1cdf3ced0dadfacb8fb7dc5e88c2fce3884468f1711dfd35db8ad4947f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkduO0zAQhi0EYsvCGyDkS26y2LGTONyVLiepqBWF68ixx63BibO2s9W-Gk-HS5eD8I1H43--mfGP0HNKrihpm1dvPu-uyD-Hk5Y_QAtalaKgtGofogVhdVmUnNUX6EmM37KoZrR9jC4YaytRMbFAP1Z-mGSw0Y_YG7ybw94q6fBmTsoPEPHSJAh4M8FYYDlqfO3n3kFx7X3AaznY0U9OxmSz1OTUVuZwTBEfbTrgFYTbMy5Ga3KU7LlPOgDe-pjR9sTx496mWdsxS9d2L4eMeI2XeBt8nEAlewv40-ySVfkhj7PL4run6JGRLsKz-_sSfX339svqQ7HevP-4Wq4LxQgVhex53WiqtGEKNNFSG6l6YfpGqwqEUKVRwITgvBaGNpRqo1mleyE1b3lj2CV6eeZOwd_MEFM32KjAOTmCn2NXVvmLq5pwmqX8LFV58BjAdFOwgwx3HSXdybUuu9b971oue3HfYe4H0H-Kftv0l3v0Lu8fv7v5CKE7gHTp8IvX1CxbTUpKS0JJcUoJ9hPOoaez</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524356041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study</title><source>HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</source><creator>Nagoshi, Narihito ; Yoshii, Toshitaka ; Egawa, Satoru ; Sakai, Kenichiro ; Kusano, Kazuo ; Nakagawa, Yukihiro ; Hirai, Takashi ; Wada, Kanichiro ; Katsumi, Keiichi ; Fujii, Kengo ; Kimura, Atsushi ; Furuya, Takeo ; Kanchiku, Tsukasa ; Nagamoto, Yukitaka ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Nakashima, Hiroaki ; Ando, Kei ; Takahata, Masahiko ; Mori, Kanji ; Nakajima, Hideaki ; Murata, Kazuma ; Matsunaga, Shunji ; Kaito, Takashi ; Yamada, Kei ; Kobayashi, Sho ; Kato, Satoshi ; Ohba, Tetsuro ; Inami, Satoshi ; Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ; Katoh, Hiroyuki ; Kanno, Haruo ; Watanabe, Kota ; Imagama, Shiro ; Koda, Masao ; Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu ; Takeshita, Katsushi ; Nakamura, Masaya ; Matsumoto, Morio ; Yamazaki, Masashi ; Okawa, Atsushi</creator><creatorcontrib>Nagoshi, Narihito ; Yoshii, Toshitaka ; Egawa, Satoru ; Sakai, Kenichiro ; Kusano, Kazuo ; Nakagawa, Yukihiro ; Hirai, Takashi ; Wada, Kanichiro ; Katsumi, Keiichi ; Fujii, Kengo ; Kimura, Atsushi ; Furuya, Takeo ; Kanchiku, Tsukasa ; Nagamoto, Yukitaka ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Nakashima, Hiroaki ; Ando, Kei ; Takahata, Masahiko ; Mori, Kanji ; Nakajima, Hideaki ; Murata, Kazuma ; Matsunaga, Shunji ; Kaito, Takashi ; Yamada, Kei ; Kobayashi, Sho ; Kato, Satoshi ; Ohba, Tetsuro ; Inami, Satoshi ; Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ; Katoh, Hiroyuki ; Kanno, Haruo ; Watanabe, Kota ; Imagama, Shiro ; Koda, Masao ; Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu ; Takeshita, Katsushi ; Nakamura, Masaya ; Matsumoto, Morio ; Yamazaki, Masashi ; Okawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><description>A prospective multicenter study. To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes after open-door (OD) and double-door (DD) laminoplasties in subjects with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although previous studies compared clinical results after OD and DD laminoplasties, they were performed at a single institution with a relatively small sample size targeting mixed pathologies, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of these, 41 and 164 patients received OD and DD laminoplasties, respectively. Demographic information, medical history, and imaging findings were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Age, sex, symptom duration, and comorbidities were not significantly different between the groups. Segmental ossification was the most frequent in both groups. No significant differences in K-line type, canal occupying ratio, C2-C7 angles, and range of motion (ROM) were found. Both procedures reduced the cervical ROM postoperatively. A comparable frequency of perioperative complications was observed between the groups. The cervical JOA scores showed a similar improvement at 2 years postoperatively. The reduction in VAS score for neck pain was favorable in the OD group (P = 0.02), while other pain assessments did not show any significant differences between the groups. The functional outcomes assessed using the JOACMEQ presented equivalent effective rates. The results demonstrated almost comparable surgical outcomes between OD and DD laminoplasties. Laminoplasty is a valuable technique as a therapeutic option for cervical OPLL.Level of Evidence: 5.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0362-2436</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-1159</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33958538</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</publisher><ispartof>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2021-12, Vol.46 (23), p.E1238-E1245</ispartof><rights>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-ab467d1cdf3ced0dadfacb8fb7dc5e88c2fce3884468f1711dfd35db8ad4947f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33958538$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nagoshi, Narihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshii, Toshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egawa, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusano, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kanichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsumi, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kengo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanchiku, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagamoto, Yukitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahata, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Kanji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaito, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohba, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inami, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujibayashi, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katoh, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanno, Haruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Kota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Katsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Morio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study</title><title>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</title><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><description>A prospective multicenter study. To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes after open-door (OD) and double-door (DD) laminoplasties in subjects with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although previous studies compared clinical results after OD and DD laminoplasties, they were performed at a single institution with a relatively small sample size targeting mixed pathologies, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of these, 41 and 164 patients received OD and DD laminoplasties, respectively. Demographic information, medical history, and imaging findings were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Age, sex, symptom duration, and comorbidities were not significantly different between the groups. Segmental ossification was the most frequent in both groups. No significant differences in K-line type, canal occupying ratio, C2-C7 angles, and range of motion (ROM) were found. Both procedures reduced the cervical ROM postoperatively. A comparable frequency of perioperative complications was observed between the groups. The cervical JOA scores showed a similar improvement at 2 years postoperatively. The reduction in VAS score for neck pain was favorable in the OD group (P = 0.02), while other pain assessments did not show any significant differences between the groups. The functional outcomes assessed using the JOACMEQ presented equivalent effective rates. The results demonstrated almost comparable surgical outcomes between OD and DD laminoplasties. Laminoplasty is a valuable technique as a therapeutic option for cervical OPLL.Level of Evidence: 5.</description><issn>0362-2436</issn><issn>1528-1159</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkduO0zAQhi0EYsvCGyDkS26y2LGTONyVLiepqBWF68ixx63BibO2s9W-Gk-HS5eD8I1H43--mfGP0HNKrihpm1dvPu-uyD-Hk5Y_QAtalaKgtGofogVhdVmUnNUX6EmM37KoZrR9jC4YaytRMbFAP1Z-mGSw0Y_YG7ybw94q6fBmTsoPEPHSJAh4M8FYYDlqfO3n3kFx7X3AaznY0U9OxmSz1OTUVuZwTBEfbTrgFYTbMy5Ga3KU7LlPOgDe-pjR9sTx496mWdsxS9d2L4eMeI2XeBt8nEAlewv40-ySVfkhj7PL4run6JGRLsKz-_sSfX339svqQ7HevP-4Wq4LxQgVhex53WiqtGEKNNFSG6l6YfpGqwqEUKVRwITgvBaGNpRqo1mleyE1b3lj2CV6eeZOwd_MEFM32KjAOTmCn2NXVvmLq5pwmqX8LFV58BjAdFOwgwx3HSXdybUuu9b971oue3HfYe4H0H-Kftv0l3v0Lu8fv7v5CKE7gHTp8IvX1CxbTUpKS0JJcUoJ9hPOoaez</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Nagoshi, Narihito</creator><creator>Yoshii, Toshitaka</creator><creator>Egawa, Satoru</creator><creator>Sakai, Kenichiro</creator><creator>Kusano, Kazuo</creator><creator>Nakagawa, Yukihiro</creator><creator>Hirai, Takashi</creator><creator>Wada, Kanichiro</creator><creator>Katsumi, Keiichi</creator><creator>Fujii, Kengo</creator><creator>Kimura, Atsushi</creator><creator>Furuya, Takeo</creator><creator>Kanchiku, Tsukasa</creator><creator>Nagamoto, Yukitaka</creator><creator>Oshima, Yasushi</creator><creator>Nakashima, Hiroaki</creator><creator>Ando, Kei</creator><creator>Takahata, Masahiko</creator><creator>Mori, Kanji</creator><creator>Nakajima, Hideaki</creator><creator>Murata, Kazuma</creator><creator>Matsunaga, Shunji</creator><creator>Kaito, Takashi</creator><creator>Yamada, Kei</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Sho</creator><creator>Kato, Satoshi</creator><creator>Ohba, Tetsuro</creator><creator>Inami, Satoshi</creator><creator>Fujibayashi, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Katoh, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Kanno, Haruo</creator><creator>Watanabe, Kota</creator><creator>Imagama, Shiro</creator><creator>Koda, Masao</creator><creator>Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu</creator><creator>Takeshita, Katsushi</creator><creator>Nakamura, Masaya</creator><creator>Matsumoto, Morio</creator><creator>Yamazaki, Masashi</creator><creator>Okawa, Atsushi</creator><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study</title><author>Nagoshi, Narihito ; Yoshii, Toshitaka ; Egawa, Satoru ; Sakai, Kenichiro ; Kusano, Kazuo ; Nakagawa, Yukihiro ; Hirai, Takashi ; Wada, Kanichiro ; Katsumi, Keiichi ; Fujii, Kengo ; Kimura, Atsushi ; Furuya, Takeo ; Kanchiku, Tsukasa ; Nagamoto, Yukitaka ; Oshima, Yasushi ; Nakashima, Hiroaki ; Ando, Kei ; Takahata, Masahiko ; Mori, Kanji ; Nakajima, Hideaki ; Murata, Kazuma ; Matsunaga, Shunji ; Kaito, Takashi ; Yamada, Kei ; Kobayashi, Sho ; Kato, Satoshi ; Ohba, Tetsuro ; Inami, Satoshi ; Fujibayashi, Shunsuke ; Katoh, Hiroyuki ; Kanno, Haruo ; Watanabe, Kota ; Imagama, Shiro ; Koda, Masao ; Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu ; Takeshita, Katsushi ; Nakamura, Masaya ; Matsumoto, Morio ; Yamazaki, Masashi ; Okawa, Atsushi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-ab467d1cdf3ced0dadfacb8fb7dc5e88c2fce3884468f1711dfd35db8ad4947f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nagoshi, Narihito</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yoshii, Toshitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egawa, Satoru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakai, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kusano, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagawa, Yukihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirai, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wada, Kanichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsumi, Keiichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujii, Kengo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Furuya, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanchiku, Tsukasa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagamoto, Yukitaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oshima, Yasushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakashima, Hiroaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ando, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takahata, Masahiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mori, Kanji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakajima, Hideaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Kazuma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsunaga, Shunji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaito, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamada, Kei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kato, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohba, Tetsuro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inami, Satoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fujibayashi, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katoh, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanno, Haruo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watanabe, Kota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imagama, Shiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koda, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeshita, Katsushi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Masaya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsumoto, Morio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamazaki, Masashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okawa, Atsushi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nagoshi, Narihito</au><au>Yoshii, Toshitaka</au><au>Egawa, Satoru</au><au>Sakai, Kenichiro</au><au>Kusano, Kazuo</au><au>Nakagawa, Yukihiro</au><au>Hirai, Takashi</au><au>Wada, Kanichiro</au><au>Katsumi, Keiichi</au><au>Fujii, Kengo</au><au>Kimura, Atsushi</au><au>Furuya, Takeo</au><au>Kanchiku, Tsukasa</au><au>Nagamoto, Yukitaka</au><au>Oshima, Yasushi</au><au>Nakashima, Hiroaki</au><au>Ando, Kei</au><au>Takahata, Masahiko</au><au>Mori, Kanji</au><au>Nakajima, Hideaki</au><au>Murata, Kazuma</au><au>Matsunaga, Shunji</au><au>Kaito, Takashi</au><au>Yamada, Kei</au><au>Kobayashi, Sho</au><au>Kato, Satoshi</au><au>Ohba, Tetsuro</au><au>Inami, Satoshi</au><au>Fujibayashi, Shunsuke</au><au>Katoh, Hiroyuki</au><au>Kanno, Haruo</au><au>Watanabe, Kota</au><au>Imagama, Shiro</au><au>Koda, Masao</au><au>Kawaguchi, Yoshiharu</au><au>Takeshita, Katsushi</au><au>Nakamura, Masaya</au><au>Matsumoto, Morio</au><au>Yamazaki, Masashi</au><au>Okawa, Atsushi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study</atitle><jtitle>Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976)</jtitle><addtitle>Spine (Phila Pa 1976)</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>23</issue><spage>E1238</spage><epage>E1245</epage><pages>E1238-E1245</pages><issn>0362-2436</issn><eissn>1528-1159</eissn><abstract>A prospective multicenter study. To evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes after open-door (OD) and double-door (DD) laminoplasties in subjects with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Although previous studies compared clinical results after OD and DD laminoplasties, they were performed at a single institution with a relatively small sample size targeting mixed pathologies, including cervical spondylotic myelopathy. This study was performed by the Japanese Multicenter Research Organization for Ossification of the Spinal Ligament. A total of 478 patients with myelopathy caused by cervical OPLL from 28 institutions were prospectively registered from 2014 to 2017 and followed up for 2 years. Of these, 41 and 164 patients received OD and DD laminoplasties, respectively. Demographic information, medical history, and imaging findings were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores. Age, sex, symptom duration, and comorbidities were not significantly different between the groups. Segmental ossification was the most frequent in both groups. No significant differences in K-line type, canal occupying ratio, C2-C7 angles, and range of motion (ROM) were found. Both procedures reduced the cervical ROM postoperatively. A comparable frequency of perioperative complications was observed between the groups. The cervical JOA scores showed a similar improvement at 2 years postoperatively. The reduction in VAS score for neck pain was favorable in the OD group (P = 0.02), while other pain assessments did not show any significant differences between the groups. The functional outcomes assessed using the JOACMEQ presented equivalent effective rates. The results demonstrated almost comparable surgical outcomes between OD and DD laminoplasties. Laminoplasty is a valuable technique as a therapeutic option for cervical OPLL.Level of Evidence: 5.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins</pub><pmid>33958538</pmid><doi>10.1097/BRS.0000000000004094</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0362-2436
ispartof Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 2021-12, Vol.46 (23), p.E1238-E1245
issn 0362-2436
1528-1159
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524356041
source HEAL-Link subscriptions: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
title Comparison of Surgical Outcomes After Open- and Double-Door Laminoplasties for Patients with Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Prospective Multicenter Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A03%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Surgical%20Outcomes%20After%20Open-%20and%20Double-Door%20Laminoplasties%20for%20Patients%20with%20Cervical%20Ossification%20of%20the%20Posterior%20Longitudinal%20Ligament:%20A%20Prospective%20Multicenter%20Study&rft.jtitle=Spine%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.%201976)&rft.au=Nagoshi,%20Narihito&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=23&rft.spage=E1238&rft.epage=E1245&rft.pages=E1238-E1245&rft.issn=0362-2436&rft.eissn=1528-1159&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/BRS.0000000000004094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524356041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3018-ab467d1cdf3ced0dadfacb8fb7dc5e88c2fce3884468f1711dfd35db8ad4947f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524356041&rft_id=info:pmid/33958538&rfr_iscdi=true