Loading…
Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality
Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutr...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nutrition in clinical practice 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93 |
container_end_page | 1033 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1020 |
container_title | Nutrition in clinical practice |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Chada, Radha Reddy Chidrawar, Sachin Goud, Bhagyasri A. Maska, Anita Medanki, Rajiv Nagalla, Balakrishna |
description | Background
Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention.
Methods
Prospective observational study of adults admitted for >24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome.
Results
Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ncp.10673 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524357089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524357089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeQWqoL3HijKXlEqkUxGWOHOdEMqRxsVOqbDwCz8iTkDYMLEzn9v1n-BA6peSCEsLGtV51TRTzPTSgSUgDFgq2jwZEyjAQnEeH6Mj7V0Ko5LEcIDvx3mqjGmNrfAnNBqDGi3XjzG4zg8p8gGtH-M4WpjRQ_Dk-Gv-G0xpPt7NWVdXiNE3xk7YORljVBWby-_Nrptou7RpVmaY9Rgelqjyc_NYherm-ep7eBvP7m3Q6mQea0ZgHOtQ5kJLrgqlIUCVYXkqR8EjkhHLGYqUAJFNC8UQxmkeFCJkuJDAd52GR8CE66_-unH1fg2-ypfEaqkrVYNc-Y4KFXMREbtHzHtXOeu-gzFbOLJVrM0qyrdSsk5rtpHbsuGc3poL2fzBbTB_6xA8EB3nh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524357089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</creator><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention.
Methods
Prospective observational study of adults admitted for >24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome.
Results
Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-5336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10673</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>energy ; enteral nutrition ; hospital stay ; intensive care unit ; Nursing ; Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score ; protein</subject><ispartof>Nutrition in clinical practice, 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidrawar, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medanki, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><title>Nutrition in clinical practice</title><description>Background
Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention.
Methods
Prospective observational study of adults admitted for >24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome.
Results
Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</description><subject>energy</subject><subject>enteral nutrition</subject><subject>hospital stay</subject><subject>intensive care unit</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score</subject><subject>protein</subject><issn>0884-5336</issn><issn>1941-2452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeQWqoL3HijKXlEqkUxGWOHOdEMqRxsVOqbDwCz8iTkDYMLEzn9v1n-BA6peSCEsLGtV51TRTzPTSgSUgDFgq2jwZEyjAQnEeH6Mj7V0Ko5LEcIDvx3mqjGmNrfAnNBqDGi3XjzG4zg8p8gGtH-M4WpjRQ_Dk-Gv-G0xpPt7NWVdXiNE3xk7YORljVBWby-_Nrptou7RpVmaY9Rgelqjyc_NYherm-ep7eBvP7m3Q6mQea0ZgHOtQ5kJLrgqlIUCVYXkqR8EjkhHLGYqUAJFNC8UQxmkeFCJkuJDAd52GR8CE66_-unH1fg2-ypfEaqkrVYNc-Y4KFXMREbtHzHtXOeu-gzFbOLJVrM0qyrdSsk5rtpHbsuGc3poL2fzBbTB_6xA8EB3nh</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Chada, Radha Reddy</creator><creator>Chidrawar, Sachin</creator><creator>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creator><creator>Maska, Anita</creator><creator>Medanki, Rajiv</creator><creator>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><author>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>energy</topic><topic>enteral nutrition</topic><topic>hospital stay</topic><topic>intensive care unit</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score</topic><topic>protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidrawar, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medanki, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chada, Radha Reddy</au><au>Chidrawar, Sachin</au><au>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</au><au>Maska, Anita</au><au>Medanki, Rajiv</au><au>Nagalla, Balakrishna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1020-1033</pages><issn>0884-5336</issn><eissn>1941-2452</eissn><abstract>Background
Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention.
Methods
Prospective observational study of adults admitted for >24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome.
Results
Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P < 0.001).
Conclusion
Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</abstract><doi>10.1002/ncp.10673</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-5336 |
ispartof | Nutrition in clinical practice, 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033 |
issn | 0884-5336 1941-2452 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524357089 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | energy enteral nutrition hospital stay intensive care unit Nursing Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score protein |
title | Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20Between%20Nutrition%20Delivery,%20Modified%20Nutrition%20Risk%20In%20Critically%20III%20Score,%20and%2028%E2%80%90Day%20Mortality&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Chada,%20Radha%20Reddy&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1020-1033&rft.issn=0884-5336&rft.eissn=1941-2452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ncp.10673&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524357089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524357089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |