Loading…

Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality

Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nutrition in clinical practice 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033
Main Authors: Chada, Radha Reddy, Chidrawar, Sachin, Goud, Bhagyasri A., Maska, Anita, Medanki, Rajiv, Nagalla, Balakrishna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93
container_end_page 1033
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1020
container_title Nutrition in clinical practice
container_volume 36
creator Chada, Radha Reddy
Chidrawar, Sachin
Goud, Bhagyasri A.
Maska, Anita
Medanki, Rajiv
Nagalla, Balakrishna
description Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention. Methods Prospective observational study of adults admitted for >24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P < 0.001). Conclusion Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ncp.10673
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524357089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2524357089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeQWqoL3HijKXlEqkUxGWOHOdEMqRxsVOqbDwCz8iTkDYMLEzn9v1n-BA6peSCEsLGtV51TRTzPTSgSUgDFgq2jwZEyjAQnEeH6Mj7V0Ko5LEcIDvx3mqjGmNrfAnNBqDGi3XjzG4zg8p8gGtH-M4WpjRQ_Dk-Gv-G0xpPt7NWVdXiNE3xk7YORljVBWby-_Nrptou7RpVmaY9Rgelqjyc_NYherm-ep7eBvP7m3Q6mQea0ZgHOtQ5kJLrgqlIUCVYXkqR8EjkhHLGYqUAJFNC8UQxmkeFCJkuJDAd52GR8CE66_-unH1fg2-ypfEaqkrVYNc-Y4KFXMREbtHzHtXOeu-gzFbOLJVrM0qyrdSsk5rtpHbsuGc3poL2fzBbTB_6xA8EB3nh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2524357089</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</creator><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><description>Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention. Methods Prospective observational study of adults admitted for &gt;24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-5336</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10673</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>energy ; enteral nutrition ; hospital stay ; intensive care unit ; Nursing ; Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score ; protein</subject><ispartof>Nutrition in clinical practice, 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidrawar, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medanki, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><title>Nutrition in clinical practice</title><description>Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention. Methods Prospective observational study of adults admitted for &gt;24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</description><subject>energy</subject><subject>enteral nutrition</subject><subject>hospital stay</subject><subject>intensive care unit</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score</subject><subject>protein</subject><issn>0884-5336</issn><issn>1941-2452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAUhi0EEqUw8AYeQWqoL3HijKXlEqkUxGWOHOdEMqRxsVOqbDwCz8iTkDYMLEzn9v1n-BA6peSCEsLGtV51TRTzPTSgSUgDFgq2jwZEyjAQnEeH6Mj7V0Ko5LEcIDvx3mqjGmNrfAnNBqDGi3XjzG4zg8p8gGtH-M4WpjRQ_Dk-Gv-G0xpPt7NWVdXiNE3xk7YORljVBWby-_Nrptou7RpVmaY9Rgelqjyc_NYherm-ep7eBvP7m3Q6mQea0ZgHOtQ5kJLrgqlIUCVYXkqR8EjkhHLGYqUAJFNC8UQxmkeFCJkuJDAd52GR8CE66_-unH1fg2-ypfEaqkrVYNc-Y4KFXMREbtHzHtXOeu-gzFbOLJVrM0qyrdSsk5rtpHbsuGc3poL2fzBbTB_6xA8EB3nh</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Chada, Radha Reddy</creator><creator>Chidrawar, Sachin</creator><creator>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creator><creator>Maska, Anita</creator><creator>Medanki, Rajiv</creator><creator>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</title><author>Chada, Radha Reddy ; Chidrawar, Sachin ; Goud, Bhagyasri A. ; Maska, Anita ; Medanki, Rajiv ; Nagalla, Balakrishna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>energy</topic><topic>enteral nutrition</topic><topic>hospital stay</topic><topic>intensive care unit</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score</topic><topic>protein</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chada, Radha Reddy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chidrawar, Sachin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maska, Anita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medanki, Rajiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagalla, Balakrishna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chada, Radha Reddy</au><au>Chidrawar, Sachin</au><au>Goud, Bhagyasri A.</au><au>Maska, Anita</au><au>Medanki, Rajiv</au><au>Nagalla, Balakrishna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality</atitle><jtitle>Nutrition in clinical practice</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1020</spage><epage>1033</epage><pages>1020-1033</pages><issn>0884-5336</issn><eissn>1941-2452</eissn><abstract>Background Nutrition delivery, is a key component in the management of critical illness. Traditional scoring systems are inadequate in the intensive care unit (ICU), as patients are sedated. Our study examines the associations between calorie and protein adequacy, 28‐day mortality, and modified Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill (mNUTRIC) score and identify at‐risk ICU patients who may benefit more from nutrition intervention. Methods Prospective observational study of adults admitted for &gt;24h to the ICU of a tertiary care hospital during a period of 7 months. Data were collected on nutrition delivery, mNUTRIC score, use of mechanical ventilation, and ICU/hospital length of stay (LOS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done with 28‐day mortality as the primary outcome. Results Two hundred forty‐eight patients were recruited for the study with 60% male, 40% female, mean age 60.8 ± 14.7, and body mass index of 24.2 ± 4.8. Patients with inadequate calorie and protein delivery had significantly higher 28‐day mortality than those with adequate provision (P=.032 and P =. 017). In bivariate logistic regression analysis, mNUTRIC score (odds ratio [OR], 1.802; 95% CI, 1.042–3.117; P = .035) and adequacy of energy (OR, 1.92) and protein (OR, 2.49) correlate with 28‐day mortality. The Kaplan‐Meier survival curve showed a survival benefit in the ≥80% energy and protein group among the total patients and was also significantly associated with lower hospital and ICU LOS, even after matching (log‐rank test, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusion Adequacy of energy and protein to ≥80% may shorten ICU/hospital LOS and reduce 28‐day mortality among both high and low nutrition risk patients.</abstract><doi>10.1002/ncp.10673</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6428-5389</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-5336
ispartof Nutrition in clinical practice, 2021-10, Vol.36 (5), p.1020-1033
issn 0884-5336
1941-2452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2524357089
source Wiley
subjects energy
enteral nutrition
hospital stay
intensive care unit
Nursing
Nutrition Risk in Critically Ill score
protein
title Association Between Nutrition Delivery, Modified Nutrition Risk In Critically III Score, and 28‐Day Mortality
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T17%3A26%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20Between%20Nutrition%20Delivery,%20Modified%20Nutrition%20Risk%20In%20Critically%20III%20Score,%20and%2028%E2%80%90Day%20Mortality&rft.jtitle=Nutrition%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Chada,%20Radha%20Reddy&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1020&rft.epage=1033&rft.pages=1020-1033&rft.issn=0884-5336&rft.eissn=1941-2452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ncp.10673&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2524357089%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2173-c4cbe0f3cd2a651a52bf859365b013227aaee82a5a39a21b6d542cd8e2c7b4d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2524357089&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true