Can Serum be a Match for Urine in the Regulatory Analysis of Boldenone in Cattle? A Systematic Comparison Between Detection Window, Stability, and Enzymatic Hydrolysis

• Published in: Journal of agricultural and food chemistry 2021-05, Vol.69 (19), p.5528-5535
• Main Authors: Rocha, Diego G, Lana, Mary Ane G, Dracz, Sérgio, da Silva, Rosemary R, de Assis, Débora C. S, da Silva, Mariana C, Augusti, Rodinei, Faria, Adriana F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Food Safety and Toxicology
• ISSN: 0021-8561; 1520-5118
• DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.1c00878

This work involved a systematic comparison between serum and urine for the monitoring of anabolic androgenic steroids in livestock. Incurred samples were collected over 120 days from crossbred steers treated with intramuscular injections containing boldenone undecylenate. Independent high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) methods were used for the assessment of the respective detection windows, which were larger for serum samples. Both matrices presented adequate performance in terms of long-term stability, assessed using an isochronous approach during 196 days at −20 °C and for five freeze–thaw cycles. The effectiveness of the enzymatic hydrolysis reaction using Helix pomatia juice was also compared. The calculated concentrations in serum samples were not statistically influenced by the deconjugation reaction. On the other hand, urine hydrolysis conditions were studied using a 33 Box–Behnken Design, in which a central point condition led to a satisfactory deconjugation performance. It could be observed that serum exhibited equivalent or better performance than urine for most of the evaluated criteria; thus, its inclusion in the regulatory analysis of boldenone in cattle is supported.