Cost‐effectiveness analysis of radiobasilic and brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistulas in hemodialysis patients

• Published in: Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis 2021-10, Vol.25 (5), p.628-635
• Main Authors: Sungur, Mehmet Ali, Karaca, Okay Güven, Ecevit, Ata Niyazi
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: arteriovenous fistula; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - economics; Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical - methods; Brachial Artery - surgery; brachiobasilic; Brachiocephalic Veins - surgery; Cost-Benefit Analysis - methods; Cost-Benefit Analysis - statistics & numerical data; cost‐effectiveness analysis; Forearm - blood supply; hemodialysis; Humans; radiobasilic; Renal Dialysis - economics; Renal Dialysis - methods; Vascular Patency
• ISSN: 1744-9979; 1744-9987
• DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13687

We evaluated the cost and efficacy of radiobasilic and brachiobasilic arteriovenous fistula (AVF) methods in terms of forearm autogenous arteriovenous access in hemodialysis patients. We used a decision tree to compare the cost‐effectiveness of proximal radiobasilic AVF (pRBAVF) and brachiobasilic AVF (BBAVF), considering the mean direct medical costs and patency rates. The overall mean cost of pRBAVF per patient (1767.59 Turkish lira [TL]) was lower than that of BBAVF (1877.99 TL). Also, the mean patency duration per patient was higher for pRBAVF (25.72 months) than BBAVF (20.21 months). The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio (ICER) showed that pRBAVF was 20.04‐fold more effective than BBAVF. The monthly ICERs also favored pRBAVF, which was less costly and more effective. The pRBAVF provided clinical and economic benefits for hemodialysis patients requiring forearm autogenous arteriovenous access. pRBAVF was more effective in terms of patency than BBAVF, and was also less expensive.