Online Peer Assessment in Undergraduate Electrical Engineering Course

• Published in: IEEE transactions on education 2021-02, Vol.64 (1), p.58-65
• Main Authors: Naveh, G., Bykhovsky, D.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Academic Achievement; Best practice; Class Size; Computer aided instruction; Computer Assisted Instruction; Educational courses; Electrical engineering; Electrical engineering education; Electronic Learning; Engineering Education; higher education; Instructional Effectiveness; Learning; peer assessment; Peer Evaluation; Random processes; Required Courses; Simulation; student assessment; Student Attitudes; Students; Undergraduate Students
• ISSN: 0018-9359; 1557-9638
• DOI: 10.1109/TE.2020.3007853

Contribution: This research presents a case study of an online peer assessment (PA) implementation in a random processes course. Students were required to submit simulation assignments, and then to evaluate their peers' submissions. The research explored the students' perception of the activity throughout the course using surveys, and their behavior and academic performance using data obtained in the course. Background: With decreased resources and larger class sizes, the obligatory theoretical random processes course in the electrical engineering program presents a challenge with regard to students' motivation and assimilation of the academic material. Intended Outcomes: In preceding research, PA was found to provide benefits for students' learning, without significantly burdening teaching staff resources. The implementation was directed at achieving these benefits. Application Design: Simulation exercises were designed to provide illustrations of relatively abstract material, and PA was instituted to facilitate better learning of the material without imposing greater resource requirements on the teaching staff. Findings: Results indicated that PA, although executed in accordance with the best practices presented in the literature, failed to achieve the benefits expected, and might even have contributed to lower grades in the course.