Loading…

Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence

Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, ho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cirugia española (English ed.) 2022-07
Main Authors: de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier, Margallo Lana, Alberto, Pérez Sola, M Ángeles, Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo, Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel, Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki, Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel, de Miguel Velasco, Mario
Format: Article
Language:eng ; spa
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Cirugia española (English ed.)
container_volume
creator de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier
Margallo Lana, Alberto
Pérez Sola, M Ángeles
Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo
Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel
Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki
Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel
de Miguel Velasco, Mario
description Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1). The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories). Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528906778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1T01LxDAUDIK4y7r_QKRHL60vSdOkRynrByx40XNJ0hfp0qY1SQX_vRXXuQxvmJnHEHJDoaBAq_tTYfuAcS4YMFpAWQCoC7JlVPJcgJQbso_xBCsqQRXAFdnwcj14BVvSHOzkp7G3mVlChz6bXDZM_iNPGMYsBdRpRJ9-5YhfGDBzaPWQ9X7Npd6jt3hNLp0eIu7PvCPvj4e35jk_vj69NA_HfGaKppyjA6FLVWvGdMe5rZXUEph1xtAKjYXSoKudUF0NwvGuEusvaaADozsq-I7c_fXOYfpcMKZ27KPFYdAepyW2TDBVQyWlWq23Z-tiRuzaOfSjDt_t_3D-A8vAW9I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528906778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1). The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories). Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2173-5077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34006360</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><ispartof>Cirugia española (English ed.), 2022-07</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><title>Cirugia española (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Cir Esp (Engl Ed)</addtitle><description>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1). The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories). Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</description><issn>2173-5077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1T01LxDAUDIK4y7r_QKRHL60vSdOkRynrByx40XNJ0hfp0qY1SQX_vRXXuQxvmJnHEHJDoaBAq_tTYfuAcS4YMFpAWQCoC7JlVPJcgJQbso_xBCsqQRXAFdnwcj14BVvSHOzkp7G3mVlChz6bXDZM_iNPGMYsBdRpRJ9-5YhfGDBzaPWQ9X7Npd6jt3hNLp0eIu7PvCPvj4e35jk_vj69NA_HfGaKppyjA6FLVWvGdMe5rZXUEph1xtAKjYXSoKudUF0NwvGuEusvaaADozsq-I7c_fXOYfpcMKZ27KPFYdAepyW2TDBVQyWlWq23Z-tiRuzaOfSjDt_t_3D-A8vAW9I</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creator><creator>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creator><creator>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creator><creator>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creator><creator>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creator><creator>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creator><creator>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><author>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cirugia española (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</au><au>Margallo Lana, Alberto</au><au>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</au><au>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</au><au>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</au><au>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</au><au>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</au><au>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</atitle><jtitle>Cirugia española (English ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cir Esp (Engl Ed)</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2173-5077</eissn><abstract>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1). The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories). Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>34006360</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2173-5077
ispartof Cirugia española (English ed.), 2022-07
issn 2173-5077
language eng ; spa
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906778
source Elsevier
title Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A21%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20burden%20of%20long-term%20treatment%20of%20severe%20fecal%20incontinence&rft.jtitle=Cirugia%20espa%C3%B1ola%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=de%20Miguel%20Valencia,%20Mario%20Javier&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.eissn=2173-5077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528906778%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528906778&rft_id=info:pmid/34006360&rfr_iscdi=true