Loading…
Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence
Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy. Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, ho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cirugia española (English ed.) 2022-07 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng ; spa |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Cirugia española (English ed.) |
container_volume | |
creator | de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier Margallo Lana, Alberto Pérez Sola, M Ángeles Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel de Miguel Velasco, Mario |
description | Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy.
Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1).
The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories).
Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2528906778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1T01LxDAUDIK4y7r_QKRHL60vSdOkRynrByx40XNJ0hfp0qY1SQX_vRXXuQxvmJnHEHJDoaBAq_tTYfuAcS4YMFpAWQCoC7JlVPJcgJQbso_xBCsqQRXAFdnwcj14BVvSHOzkp7G3mVlChz6bXDZM_iNPGMYsBdRpRJ9-5YhfGDBzaPWQ9X7Npd6jt3hNLp0eIu7PvCPvj4e35jk_vj69NA_HfGaKppyjA6FLVWvGdMe5rZXUEph1xtAKjYXSoKudUF0NwvGuEusvaaADozsq-I7c_fXOYfpcMKZ27KPFYdAepyW2TDBVQyWlWq23Z-tiRuzaOfSjDt_t_3D-A8vAW9I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2528906778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creator><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><description>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy.
Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1).
The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories).
Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2173-5077</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34006360</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Spain</publisher><ispartof>Cirugia española (English ed.), 2022-07</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2021 AEC. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34006360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><title>Cirugia española (English ed.)</title><addtitle>Cir Esp (Engl Ed)</addtitle><description>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy.
Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1).
The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories).
Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</description><issn>2173-5077</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1T01LxDAUDIK4y7r_QKRHL60vSdOkRynrByx40XNJ0hfp0qY1SQX_vRXXuQxvmJnHEHJDoaBAq_tTYfuAcS4YMFpAWQCoC7JlVPJcgJQbso_xBCsqQRXAFdnwcj14BVvSHOzkp7G3mVlChz6bXDZM_iNPGMYsBdRpRJ9-5YhfGDBzaPWQ9X7Npd6jt3hNLp0eIu7PvCPvj4e35jk_vj69NA_HfGaKppyjA6FLVWvGdMe5rZXUEph1xtAKjYXSoKudUF0NwvGuEusvaaADozsq-I7c_fXOYfpcMKZ27KPFYdAepyW2TDBVQyWlWq23Z-tiRuzaOfSjDt_t_3D-A8vAW9I</recordid><startdate>20220701</startdate><enddate>20220701</enddate><creator>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creator><creator>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creator><creator>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creator><creator>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creator><creator>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creator><creator>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creator><creator>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creator><creator>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220701</creationdate><title>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</title><author>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier ; Margallo Lana, Alberto ; Pérez Sola, M Ángeles ; Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo ; Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel ; Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki ; Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel ; de Miguel Velasco, Mario</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margallo Lana, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cirugia española (English ed.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Miguel Valencia, Mario Javier</au><au>Margallo Lana, Alberto</au><au>Pérez Sola, M Ángeles</au><au>Sánchez Iriso, Eduardo</au><au>Cabasés Hita, Juan Manuel</au><au>Alberdi Ibáñez, Iñaki</au><au>Ciga Lozano, Miguel Ángel</au><au>de Miguel Velasco, Mario</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence</atitle><jtitle>Cirugia española (English ed.)</jtitle><addtitle>Cir Esp (Engl Ed)</addtitle><date>2022-07-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><eissn>2173-5077</eissn><abstract>Find out the long-term economic cost associated with the treatment of severe fecal incontinence by SNS versus symptomatic conservative treatment and definitive colostomy.
Detailed descriptive study of the costs of the healthcare process (interventions, consultations, devices, complementary tests, hospitalization, etc.) of 3 treatment alternatives for fecal incontinence using analytical accounting tools of the Health Service based on clinical activity data. The frequency of use of health resources or the quantity of products dispensed in pharmacies (medication, diapers, ostomy material, etc.) was estimated in each case. Costs derived from adverse situations were included. Patients with severe fecal incontinence, defined by a score greater than 9 on the Wexner severity scale, in whom first-line treatments had failed, were included. Data from a consecutive cohort of 93 patients who underwent an SNS between 2002 and 2016 were used; patients who underwent definitive colostomy (n=2); parastomal hernia (n=3), and colostomy stenosis (n=1).
The mean cumulative cost in 10 years per patient in each alternative was: € 10,972.9 symptomatic treatment (62% diapers); € 17,351.57 SNS (95.83% interventions; 81.6% devices); € 25,858.54 definitive colostomy (70.4% ostomy material and accessories).
Management of severe fecal incontinence implies a great burden in economic terms. The colostomy is the alternative that generates the most direct cost, followed by SNS and symptomatic treatment.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pmid>34006360</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2173-5077 |
ispartof | Cirugia española (English ed.), 2022-07 |
issn | 2173-5077 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2528906778 |
source | Elsevier |
title | Economic burden of long-term treatment of severe fecal incontinence |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A21%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20burden%20of%20long-term%20treatment%20of%20severe%20fecal%20incontinence&rft.jtitle=Cirugia%20espa%C3%B1ola%20(English%20ed.)&rft.au=de%20Miguel%20Valencia,%20Mario%20Javier&rft.date=2022-07-01&rft.eissn=2173-5077&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ciresp.2021.04.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2528906778%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p281t-3ef05a489a22ad33c987a702cfbb16ebc04bef9f58d905f3d65fec7b0d0bad153%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2528906778&rft_id=info:pmid/34006360&rfr_iscdi=true |