Investigation on (Zn) doping and anionic surfactant (SDS) effect on SnO2 nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic RhB dye degradation

• Published in: Environmental research 2021-08, Vol.199, p.111312-111312, Article 111312
• Main Authors: Keerthana, SP, Yuvakkumar, R., Ravi, G., Manimegalai, M., Pannipara, Mehboobali, Al-Sehemi, Abdullah G., Gopal, Ramu Adam, Hanafiah, Marlia M., Velauthapillai, Dhayalan
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anionic surfactant; Bandgap; Nanoball; RhB; SnO2
• ISSN: 0013-9351; 1096-0953
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111312

Herein we reported the effect of doping and addition of surfactant on SnO2 nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic activity. Pristine SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) was prepared via simple co-precipitation method and the product was annealed at 600 °C to obtain a clear phase. The structural, optical, vibrational, morphological characteristics of the synthesized SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) product were investigated. SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) possess crystallite size of 20 nm, 19 nm and 18 nm correspondingly with tetragonal structure and high purity. The metal oxygen vibrations were present in FT-IR spectra. The obtained bandgap energies of SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) were 3.58 eV, 3.51 eV and 2.81 eV due to the effect of dopant and surfactant. This narrowing of bandgap helped in the photocatalytic activity. The morphology of the pristine sample showed poor growth of nanostructures with high level of agglomeration which was effectively reduced for other two samples. Product photocatalytic action was tested beneath visible light of 300 W. SDS-(Zn–SnO2) nanostructure efficiency showed 90% degradation of RhB dye which is 2.5 times higher than pristine sample. Narrow bandgap, crystallite size, better growth of nanostructures paved the way for SDS-(Zn–SnO2) to degrade the toxic pollutant. The superior performance and individuality of SDS-(Zn–SnO2) will makes it a potential competitor on reducing toxic pollutants from wastewater in future research. •SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) product were investigated.•Bandgap of SnO2, Zn–SnO2 and SDS-(Zn–SnO2) were 3.58, 3.51, 2.81 eV.•Narrowing bandgap helped in photocatalytic activity.•SDS-(Zn–SnO2) efficiency showed 90% RhB degradation.•SDS-(Zn–SnO2) explored 2.5 times higher than pristine sample.