Loading…
Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment
Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Journal of nutrition 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63 |
container_end_page | 2371 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2361 |
container_title | The Journal of nutrition |
container_volume | 151 |
creator | Livingstone, Katherine M Abbott, Gavin Lamb, Karen E Dullaghan, Kate Worsley, Tony McNaughton, Sarah A |
description | Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context.
This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups.
Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status.
In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jn/nxab106 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532259197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022316622002917</els_id><sourcerecordid>2560874758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0UFvFCEYBmBiNHatXvwBhsSLMR3LN8MwjLd1W22TGmNiD54IA9902czCCkxtf4V_WXRXD8YTCXl4-eAl5DmwN8D65nTjT_2dHoCJB2QBLYdKAGMPyYKxuq4aEOKIPElpwxgD3svH5KjhrBFNKxfkx7W3GFPW3jp_Qz-inuhqHZzBRJ2nX8Ncdpd2nnKixdBLnzFqk13wiX53eU3PcBtuot6tnUkn9Mxhpp9nPbl8f_L7xEWJLOwdrvWtCzG9pcuikomY8XAVPb_bYXRb9PkpeTTqKeGzw3pMrt-ff1ldVFefPlyulleVaXqRq3EEI2TPRjPy2nAYBjuCACNZJ3RroesEMo7SNJxjyxm3g4FWMhwl9DCI5pi82ufuYvg2Y8pqW2bCadIew5xU3TZ13fbQd4W-_Iduwhx9ma4owWTHu1YW9XqvTAwpRRzVrrxIx3sFTP2qSW28OtRU8ItD5Dxs0f6lf3opgO8Blj-4dRhVMg69QesimqxscP_L_QnFOKF_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560874758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><description>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context.
This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups.
Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status.
In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) <25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time.
Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34036358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Decision making ; Demographics ; Demography ; Diet ; diet quality ; discrete choice experiment ; eating behaviors ; eating patterns ; Education ; Female ; Females ; Food ; food choice ; Food Preferences ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Logit models ; Male ; meal preference ; Meals ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Status ; Polls & surveys ; Preferences ; Sex ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Subgroups ; Taste ; Weight ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Nutrition Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9782-8450 ; 0000-0003-4014-0705 ; 0000-0002-9682-7541 ; 0000-0002-4635-6059 ; 0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316622002917$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worsley, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><title>The Journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><description>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context.
This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups.
Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status.
In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) <25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time.
Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>diet quality</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>eating behaviors</subject><subject>eating patterns</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food choice</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logit models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meal preference</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0022-3166</issn><issn>1541-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0UFvFCEYBmBiNHatXvwBhsSLMR3LN8MwjLd1W22TGmNiD54IA9902czCCkxtf4V_WXRXD8YTCXl4-eAl5DmwN8D65nTjT_2dHoCJB2QBLYdKAGMPyYKxuq4aEOKIPElpwxgD3svH5KjhrBFNKxfkx7W3GFPW3jp_Qz-inuhqHZzBRJ2nX8Ncdpd2nnKixdBLnzFqk13wiX53eU3PcBtuot6tnUkn9Mxhpp9nPbl8f_L7xEWJLOwdrvWtCzG9pcuikomY8XAVPb_bYXRb9PkpeTTqKeGzw3pMrt-ff1ldVFefPlyulleVaXqRq3EEI2TPRjPy2nAYBjuCACNZJ3RroesEMo7SNJxjyxm3g4FWMhwl9DCI5pi82ufuYvg2Y8pqW2bCadIew5xU3TZ13fbQd4W-_Iduwhx9ma4owWTHu1YW9XqvTAwpRRzVrrxIx3sFTP2qSW28OtRU8ItD5Dxs0f6lf3opgO8Blj-4dRhVMg69QesimqxscP_L_QnFOKF_</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Livingstone, Katherine M</creator><creator>Abbott, Gavin</creator><creator>Lamb, Karen E</creator><creator>Dullaghan, Kate</creator><creator>Worsley, Tony</creator><creator>McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Institute of Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-6059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><author>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>diet quality</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>eating behaviors</topic><topic>eating patterns</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food choice</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logit models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meal preference</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worsley, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Livingstone, Katherine M</au><au>Abbott, Gavin</au><au>Lamb, Karen E</au><au>Dullaghan, Kate</au><au>Worsley, Tony</au><au>McNaughton, Sarah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2361</spage><epage>2371</epage><pages>2361-2371</pages><issn>0022-3166</issn><eissn>1541-6100</eissn><abstract>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context.
This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups.
Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status.
In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) <25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time.
Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34036358</pmid><doi>10.1093/jn/nxab106</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-6059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3166 |
ispartof | The Journal of nutrition, 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371 |
issn | 0022-3166 1541-6100 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532259197 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Adults Decision making Demographics Demography Diet diet quality discrete choice experiment eating behaviors eating patterns Education Female Females Food food choice Food Preferences Health Behavior Humans Logit models Male meal preference Meals Nutrition Nutritional Status Polls & surveys Preferences Sex Socioeconomic factors Studies Subgroups Taste Weight Young Adult Young adults |
title | Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A57%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Meal%20Choices%20in%20Young%20Adults%20and%20Interactions%20with%20Demographics,%20Diet%20Quality,%20and%20Health%20Behaviors:%20A%20Discrete%20Choice%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Livingstone,%20Katherine%20M&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2361&rft.epage=2371&rft.pages=2361-2371&rft.issn=0022-3166&rft.eissn=1541-6100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jn/nxab106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2560874758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560874758&rft_id=info:pmid/34036358&rfr_iscdi=true |