Loading…

Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of nutrition 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371
Main Authors: Livingstone, Katherine M, Abbott, Gavin, Lamb, Karen E, Dullaghan, Kate, Worsley, Tony, McNaughton, Sarah A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63
container_end_page 2371
container_issue 8
container_start_page 2361
container_title The Journal of nutrition
container_volume 151
creator Livingstone, Katherine M
Abbott, Gavin
Lamb, Karen E
Dullaghan, Kate
Worsley, Tony
McNaughton, Sarah A
description Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups. Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status. In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2)
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jn/nxab106
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532259197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022316622002917</els_id><sourcerecordid>2560874758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0UFvFCEYBmBiNHatXvwBhsSLMR3LN8MwjLd1W22TGmNiD54IA9902czCCkxtf4V_WXRXD8YTCXl4-eAl5DmwN8D65nTjT_2dHoCJB2QBLYdKAGMPyYKxuq4aEOKIPElpwxgD3svH5KjhrBFNKxfkx7W3GFPW3jp_Qz-inuhqHZzBRJ2nX8Ncdpd2nnKixdBLnzFqk13wiX53eU3PcBtuot6tnUkn9Mxhpp9nPbl8f_L7xEWJLOwdrvWtCzG9pcuikomY8XAVPb_bYXRb9PkpeTTqKeGzw3pMrt-ff1ldVFefPlyulleVaXqRq3EEI2TPRjPy2nAYBjuCACNZJ3RroesEMo7SNJxjyxm3g4FWMhwl9DCI5pi82ufuYvg2Y8pqW2bCadIew5xU3TZ13fbQd4W-_Iduwhx9ma4owWTHu1YW9XqvTAwpRRzVrrxIx3sFTP2qSW28OtRU8ItD5Dxs0f6lf3opgO8Blj-4dRhVMg69QesimqxscP_L_QnFOKF_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560874758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><description>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups. Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status. In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) &lt;25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time. Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3166</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1541-6100</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab106</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34036358</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Adults ; Decision making ; Demographics ; Demography ; Diet ; diet quality ; discrete choice experiment ; eating behaviors ; eating patterns ; Education ; Female ; Females ; Food ; food choice ; Food Preferences ; Health Behavior ; Humans ; Logit models ; Male ; meal preference ; Meals ; Nutrition ; Nutritional Status ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Preferences ; Sex ; Socioeconomic factors ; Studies ; Subgroups ; Taste ; Weight ; Young Adult ; Young adults</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nutrition, 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371</ispartof><rights>2021 American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Nutrition Aug 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9782-8450 ; 0000-0003-4014-0705 ; 0000-0002-9682-7541 ; 0000-0002-4635-6059 ; 0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316622002917$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27924,27925,45780</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036358$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worsley, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><title>The Journal of nutrition</title><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><description>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups. Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status. In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) &lt;25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time. Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>diet quality</subject><subject>discrete choice experiment</subject><subject>eating behaviors</subject><subject>eating patterns</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>food choice</subject><subject>Food Preferences</subject><subject>Health Behavior</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Logit models</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>meal preference</subject><subject>Meals</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Nutritional Status</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Preferences</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subgroups</subject><subject>Taste</subject><subject>Weight</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><subject>Young adults</subject><issn>0022-3166</issn><issn>1541-6100</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpt0UFvFCEYBmBiNHatXvwBhsSLMR3LN8MwjLd1W22TGmNiD54IA9902czCCkxtf4V_WXRXD8YTCXl4-eAl5DmwN8D65nTjT_2dHoCJB2QBLYdKAGMPyYKxuq4aEOKIPElpwxgD3svH5KjhrBFNKxfkx7W3GFPW3jp_Qz-inuhqHZzBRJ2nX8Ncdpd2nnKixdBLnzFqk13wiX53eU3PcBtuot6tnUkn9Mxhpp9nPbl8f_L7xEWJLOwdrvWtCzG9pcuikomY8XAVPb_bYXRb9PkpeTTqKeGzw3pMrt-ff1ldVFefPlyulleVaXqRq3EEI2TPRjPy2nAYBjuCACNZJ3RroesEMo7SNJxjyxm3g4FWMhwl9DCI5pi82ufuYvg2Y8pqW2bCadIew5xU3TZ13fbQd4W-_Iduwhx9ma4owWTHu1YW9XqvTAwpRRzVrrxIx3sFTP2qSW28OtRU8ItD5Dxs0f6lf3opgO8Blj-4dRhVMg69QesimqxscP_L_QnFOKF_</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Livingstone, Katherine M</creator><creator>Abbott, Gavin</creator><creator>Lamb, Karen E</creator><creator>Dullaghan, Kate</creator><creator>Worsley, Tony</creator><creator>McNaughton, Sarah A</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>American Institute of Nutrition</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-6059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</title><author>Livingstone, Katherine M ; Abbott, Gavin ; Lamb, Karen E ; Dullaghan, Kate ; Worsley, Tony ; McNaughton, Sarah A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>diet quality</topic><topic>discrete choice experiment</topic><topic>eating behaviors</topic><topic>eating patterns</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>food choice</topic><topic>Food Preferences</topic><topic>Health Behavior</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Logit models</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>meal preference</topic><topic>Meals</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Nutritional Status</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Preferences</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subgroups</topic><topic>Taste</topic><topic>Weight</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><topic>Young adults</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Livingstone, Katherine M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, Gavin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamb, Karen E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dullaghan, Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worsley, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNaughton, Sarah A</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Livingstone, Katherine M</au><au>Abbott, Gavin</au><au>Lamb, Karen E</au><au>Dullaghan, Kate</au><au>Worsley, Tony</au><au>McNaughton, Sarah A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>J Nutr</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>151</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2361</spage><epage>2371</epage><pages>2361-2371</pages><issn>0022-3166</issn><eissn>1541-6100</eissn><abstract>Our understanding of meal choices is limited by methodologies that do not account for the complexity of food choice behaviors. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) rank choices in a decision-making context. This study aimed to rank the relative importance of influences on meal choices in young adults and examine interactions by subgroups. Adults (18–30 y) living in Australia were recruited via social media to complete an Internet-based DCE and survey. Participants were presented with 12 choice sets about a typical weekday meal, consisting of 5 attributes (taste, preparation time, nutrition content, cost, and quality). Diet quality (Dietary Guideline Index) was calculated from brief dietary questions. Conditional logit models ranked meal attributes, including interactions by sex, education, area-level disadvantage, diet quality, and weight status. In total, 577 adults (46% female, mean ± SD age 23.8 ± 3.8 y) completed the DCE and survey. Nutrition content was the most important influence on meal choice (B: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.31, 1.64), followed by cost (B: –0.75; 95% CI: –0.87, –0.63), quality (B: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.67), taste (B: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.45, 0.65), and preparation time (B: –0.42; 95% CI: –0.52, –0.31). Females, those with higher diet quality, and those with a BMI (in kg/m2) &lt;25 had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Females had higher preferences for better taste and lower preferences for higher-cost meals. Participants with higher education had higher preferences for better nutrition content. Participants living in higher area-level disadvantage areas had higher preferences for longer preparation time. Nutrition content was the most important influence on young adults’ meal choices. Preferences differed by sex, socioeconomic position, diet quality, and weight status. Findings show the suitability of DCEs for understanding food choice behaviors in young adults and support the need for meal-based interventions to be tailored according to demographic and health characteristics.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34036358</pmid><doi>10.1093/jn/nxab106</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-8450</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4014-0705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9682-7541</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4635-6059</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5936-9820</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3166
ispartof The Journal of nutrition, 2021-08, Vol.151 (8), p.2361-2371
issn 0022-3166
1541-6100
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2532259197
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Adults
Decision making
Demographics
Demography
Diet
diet quality
discrete choice experiment
eating behaviors
eating patterns
Education
Female
Females
Food
food choice
Food Preferences
Health Behavior
Humans
Logit models
Male
meal preference
Meals
Nutrition
Nutritional Status
Polls & surveys
Preferences
Sex
Socioeconomic factors
Studies
Subgroups
Taste
Weight
Young Adult
Young adults
title Understanding Meal Choices in Young Adults and Interactions with Demographics, Diet Quality, and Health Behaviors: A Discrete Choice Experiment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T20%3A57%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20Meal%20Choices%20in%20Young%20Adults%20and%20Interactions%20with%20Demographics,%20Diet%20Quality,%20and%20Health%20Behaviors:%20A%20Discrete%20Choice%20Experiment&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nutrition&rft.au=Livingstone,%20Katherine%20M&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=151&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2361&rft.epage=2371&rft.pages=2361-2371&rft.issn=0022-3166&rft.eissn=1541-6100&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jn/nxab106&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2560874758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-ff1c6890fcf42c41bbdf161c8076a5d1776e04e8c344e5404dbc1580ef8191b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560874758&rft_id=info:pmid/34036358&rfr_iscdi=true