Bucket handle meniscus tears in low-resource settings can be successfully treated with a cost-effective technique

• Published in: International orthopaedics 2022, Vol.46 (1), p.43-49
• Main Authors: Imada, Allicia Ostoposides, O’Hara, James J., Proumen, Ignacio L., Molinari, Pablo S., Wascher, Daniel C., Richter, Dustin L., Schenck, Robert C.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Arthroscopy - methods; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Humans; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Menisci, Tibial - surgery; Original Paper; Orthopedics; Retrospective Studies; Tibial Meniscus Injuries - surgery
• ISSN: 0341-2695; 1432-5195
• DOI: 10.1007/s00264-021-05090-6

Purpose In regions of the world where resources can limit medical care (limited-resource settings, LRS), most meniscal tears are often treated with meniscectomy. A simple, low-cost option for meniscal repair has been developed. We sought to evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROMs) and clinical failure rates of bucket handle meniscus tears (BHTs) treated with meniscal repair in a LRS. Methods We prospectively enrolled patients over 18 who were treated for BHT with meniscal repair in a LRS. Meniscal repair was primarily accomplished using an outside-in technique. Pre-injury and final follow-up PROMs were recorded. Clinical failure was defined as the need for re-operation or symptoms that prevented the patient from returning to recreational activities or work responsibilities. Results Nineteen patients with a mean age of 25.4 years were eligible. Two patients sustained a clinical failure (10.5%). At mean follow-up of 40.6 months, there was significant improvement in all PROMs from baseline. Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the failure group compared to the success group in number of knots used, pre-injury Tegner score, number of devices used, suture type, or technique. Conclusion Bucket-handle meniscal tears can be repaired using a low-cost technique resulting in satisfactory healing rates and excellent outcomes.