Loadingā¦
Thyroid FNA terminology: The case for a single unified international system for thyroid FNA reporting
The use of reporting terminologies for thyroid FNA cytology enables standardisation and international alignment of the reporting of thyroid cytology results, which is essential. There are currently three major internationally recognised systems: Bethesda (TBS), UK RCPath (Thy), and Italian (TIR). A...
Saved in:
Published in: | Cytopathology (Oxford) 2021-11, Vol.32 (6), p.714-717 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The use of reporting terminologies for thyroid FNA cytology enables standardisation and international alignment of the reporting of thyroid cytology results, which is essential. There are currently three major internationally recognised systems: Bethesda (TBS), UK RCPath (Thy), and Italian (TIR). A fourth terminology system used in Japan has identical categories to TBS but with different nomenclature. The aim of this review is to discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the TBS, UK RCPath, and TIR systems, and to make the case for international terminology harmonisation and standardisation.
This article discusses the need for international standardisation of thyroid FNA reporting terminology. The article addresses in depth the strengths and weaknesses of existing terminologies, making the case for a single universal international system for thyroid FNA reporting. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0956-5507 1365-2303 |
DOI: | 10.1111/cyt.13017 |