The Methodological Integrity of Critical Qualitative Research: Principles to Support Design and Research Review

This article articulates principles and practices that support methodological integrity in relation to critical qualitative research. We begin by describing 2 changes that have occurred in psychological methods over the last 15 years. (a) Building on foundational work advocating for epistemological...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of counseling psychology 2021-04, Vol.68 (3), p.357-370
Main Authors: Levitt, Heidi M., Morrill, Zenobia, Collins, Kathleen M., Rizo, Javier L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Action Research
Critical theory
Diversity
Epistemology
Experimental Design
Integrity
Morality
Publishing
Qualitative Methods
Qualitative research
Research Design
Research methodology
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article articulates principles and practices that support methodological integrity in relation to critical qualitative research. We begin by describing 2 changes that have occurred in psychological methods over the last 15 years. (a) Building on foundational work advocating for epistemological pluralism, guidelines on how to design, review, and report qualitative and mixed methods have been advanced to support methodological integrity in keeping with a diversity of researchers' aims and approaches. (b) There has been an increased use of critical epistemological perspectives and critical methods. In light of these changes, the current article puts forward principles to support critical qualitative researchers when considering methodological rigor and when formulating rationales to support their methods in the journal article review process. Illustrating the principles with an example of critical research, the article describes common problems and issues in the research design process that can be considered in order to strengthen the returns of critical studies. Recommendations are made for editors and reviewers on how to conduct reviews of critical qualitative research, and pressing concerns for publishing critical qualitative research are detailed. Public Significance Statement This article articulates the principles and practices that underlie methodological integrity to demonstrate how they can be applied to support critical qualitative research. It offers recommendations that can strengthen rigor and can support the review and publishing of this research.
ISSN:0022-0167
1939-2168
DOI:10.1037/cou0000523