Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency

Objective To assess the effect and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with renal insufficiency. Patients and methods A prospective randomized clinical study of 104 renal insufficiency patients with renal stones (serum creatini...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:World journal of urology 2021-12, Vol.39 (12), p.4477-4482
Main Authors: AbdelRazek, Mostafa, Abolyosr, Ahmad, AbdelKader, Mohammed S., Hassan, Ahmed M., Hamed, Ahmed A., Alsagheer, Gamal
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aged
Calculi
Creatinine
Epidermal growth factor receptors
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi - complications
Kidney Calculi - therapy
Lithotripsy
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrolithiasis
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Nephrology
Oncology
Original Article
Patients
Prospective Studies
Renal insufficiency
Renal Insufficiency - etiology
Renal Insufficiency - therapy
Statistical analysis
Treatment Outcome
Urological surgery
Urology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective To assess the effect and outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients with renal insufficiency. Patients and methods A prospective randomized clinical study of 104 renal insufficiency patients with renal stones (serum creatinine 2–4 mg/dl and eGFR 
ISSN:0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-021-03751-0