Loading…
Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process
We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back....
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian journal on aging 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.40-54 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3 |
container_end_page | 54 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 40 |
container_title | Canadian journal on aging |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Tate, Kaitlyn Lee, Sarah Rowe, Brian H Cummings, Garnet E Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna Reid, R Colin El-Bialy, Rowan Bakal, Jeffrey Estabrooks, Carole A Anderson, Carol Cummings, Greta G |
description | We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0714980820000446 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536796759</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0714980820000446</cupid><sourcerecordid>2637041374</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIkPgAGyQJTZsGsp_bZtdNCEQKVICE9Ytt7saPOqfwe4GzS7X4HqcBLcyBATCG7tU36t68iPkKYOXDJh-tQHNpDVgOOQjZXmPrJhmUDAG-j5ZLe1i6R-RRyltAbixUD4kR0KCASXEivj3s-vCtKfnQxO8m8aYaDtGetk1GOkVxjQO6cfNd3od3ZDCFHJJw0DXLuJrekI3-zRh76bg6Qf8GvAbdUNDT7HbfQ70Ko4eU3pMHrSuS_jkcB-Tj2dvrtfviovLt-frk4vCS2amgluPplWK29opzlQJxnktOOc1eO_bRklReoWqldyidNy2da2cBautNuDEMXlxO3cXxy8zpqnqQ_LYdW7AcU4VV6LUttTKZvT5X-h2nOOQ3VW8FBokE1pmit1SPo4pRWyrXQy9i_uKQbUkUP2TQNY8O0ye6x6bO8WvL8-AvFu9RT_1c8Lf2420lvNqs8S4pMg5g_zQWSYOXlxfx9B8-kP0fzc_ATXzn4E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2637041374</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Sociology Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Tate, Kaitlyn ; Lee, Sarah ; Rowe, Brian H ; Cummings, Garnet E ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Reid, R Colin ; El-Bialy, Rowan ; Bakal, Jeffrey ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Anderson, Carol ; Cummings, Greta G</creator><creatorcontrib>Tate, Kaitlyn ; Lee, Sarah ; Rowe, Brian H ; Cummings, Garnet E ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Reid, R Colin ; El-Bialy, Rowan ; Bakal, Jeffrey ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Anderson, Carol ; Cummings, Greta G</creatorcontrib><description>We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0714-9808</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1710-1107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0714980820000446</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34080533</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Acute services ; Continuity of care ; Data collection ; Delphi method ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency services ; Feasibility ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Literature reviews ; Long term health care ; Medicine ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal on aging, 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.40-54</ispartof><rights>Canadian Association on Gerontology 2021</rights><rights>Copyright © Canadian Association on Gerontology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2637041374/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2637041374?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,21387,21394,21395,27344,27924,27925,33223,33611,33612,33774,33985,33986,34530,34531,36060,36061,43733,43948,44115,44363,72960,74221,74468,74639,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34080533$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tate, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Brian H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Garnet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bialy, Rowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakal, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Greta G</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process</title><title>Canadian journal on aging</title><addtitle>Can. J. Aging</addtitle><description>We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data.</description><subject>Acute services</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Delphi method</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency services</subject><subject>Feasibility</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Long term health care</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0714-9808</issn><issn>1710-1107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>HEHIP</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><sourceid>M2S</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1uFDEQhS0EIkPgAGyQJTZsGsp_bZtdNCEQKVICE9Ytt7saPOqfwe4GzS7X4HqcBLcyBATCG7tU36t68iPkKYOXDJh-tQHNpDVgOOQjZXmPrJhmUDAG-j5ZLe1i6R-RRyltAbixUD4kR0KCASXEivj3s-vCtKfnQxO8m8aYaDtGetk1GOkVxjQO6cfNd3od3ZDCFHJJw0DXLuJrekI3-zRh76bg6Qf8GvAbdUNDT7HbfQ70Ko4eU3pMHrSuS_jkcB-Tj2dvrtfviovLt-frk4vCS2amgluPplWK29opzlQJxnktOOc1eO_bRklReoWqldyidNy2da2cBautNuDEMXlxO3cXxy8zpqnqQ_LYdW7AcU4VV6LUttTKZvT5X-h2nOOQ3VW8FBokE1pmit1SPo4pRWyrXQy9i_uKQbUkUP2TQNY8O0ye6x6bO8WvL8-AvFu9RT_1c8Lf2420lvNqs8S4pMg5g_zQWSYOXlxfx9B8-kP0fzc_ATXzn4E</recordid><startdate>20220301</startdate><enddate>20220301</enddate><creator>Tate, Kaitlyn</creator><creator>Lee, Sarah</creator><creator>Rowe, Brian H</creator><creator>Cummings, Garnet E</creator><creator>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creator><creator>Reid, R Colin</creator><creator>El-Bialy, Rowan</creator><creator>Bakal, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Estabrooks, Carole A</creator><creator>Anderson, Carol</creator><creator>Cummings, Greta G</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8FQ</scope><scope>8FV</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>M3G</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220301</creationdate><title>Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process</title><author>Tate, Kaitlyn ; Lee, Sarah ; Rowe, Brian H ; Cummings, Garnet E ; Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna ; Reid, R Colin ; El-Bialy, Rowan ; Bakal, Jeffrey ; Estabrooks, Carole A ; Anderson, Carol ; Cummings, Greta G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Acute services</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Delphi method</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency services</topic><topic>Feasibility</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Long term health care</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tate, Kaitlyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowe, Brian H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Garnet E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reid, R Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Bialy, Rowan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakal, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estabrooks, Carole A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummings, Greta G</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database</collection><collection>Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>CBCA Reference & Current Events</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal on aging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tate, Kaitlyn</au><au>Lee, Sarah</au><au>Rowe, Brian H</au><au>Cummings, Garnet E</au><au>Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna</au><au>Reid, R Colin</au><au>El-Bialy, Rowan</au><au>Bakal, Jeffrey</au><au>Estabrooks, Carole A</au><au>Anderson, Carol</au><au>Cummings, Greta G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal on aging</jtitle><addtitle>Can. J. Aging</addtitle><date>2022-03-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>40</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>40-54</pages><issn>0714-9808</issn><eissn>1710-1107</eissn><abstract>We identified quality indicators (QIs) for care during transitions of older persons (≥ 65 years of age). Through systematic literature review, we catalogued QIs related to older persons’ transitions in care among continuing care settings and between continuing care and acute care settings and back. Through two Delphi survey rounds, experts ranked relevance, feasibility, and scientific soundness of QIs. A steering committee reviewed QIs for their feasible capture in Canadian administrative databases. Our search yielded 326 QIs from 53 sources. A final set of 38 feasible indicators to measure in current practice was included. The highest proportions of indicators were for the emergency department (47%) and the Institute of Medicine (IOM) quality domain of effectiveness (39.5%). Most feasible indicators were outcome indicators. Our work highlights a lack of standardized transition QI development in practice, and the limitations of current free-text documentation systems in capturing relevant and consistent data.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>34080533</pmid><doi>10.1017/S0714980820000446</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0714-9808 |
ispartof | Canadian journal on aging, 2022-03, Vol.41 (1), p.40-54 |
issn | 0714-9808 1710-1107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2536796759 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Cambridge Journals Online; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection; Sociology Collection; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Acute services Continuity of care Data collection Delphi method Emergency medical care Emergency services Feasibility Health care Hospitals Literature reviews Long term health care Medicine Nursing homes Older people Quality management Quality of care Systematic review |
title | Quality Indicators for Older Persons’ Transitions in Care: A Systematic Review and Delphi Process |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Indicators%20for%20Older%20Persons%E2%80%99%20Transitions%20in%20Care:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Delphi%20Process&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20on%20aging&rft.au=Tate,%20Kaitlyn&rft.date=2022-03-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=40&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=40-54&rft.issn=0714-9808&rft.eissn=1710-1107&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0714980820000446&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2637041374%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-29ce8f5529ba5215608ac73222b0cccfd5436c5e5f429e4a29fbb5a90979780a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2637041374&rft_id=info:pmid/34080533&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0714980820000446&rfr_iscdi=true |