Loading…

Psychometric properties for the Norwegian translations of two revised APHAB-subscales and an adapted IOI-HA (IOI-CI) in patients with cochlear implants

The objective was to examine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires in Norwegian for the self-assessment of satisfaction following cochlear implantation. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids adapted for cochlear implants (IOI-CI) and two revised subscales from the Norwegia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of audiology 2022-07, Vol.61 (7), p.1-614
Main Authors: Heggdal, Peder O Laugen, Næss, Mathias H, Hess-Erga, Jeanette, Larsen, Kristina S, Aarstad, Hans Jørgen
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The objective was to examine the psychometric properties of two questionnaires in Norwegian for the self-assessment of satisfaction following cochlear implantation. The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids adapted for cochlear implants (IOI-CI) and two revised subscales from the Norwegian translation of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) were applied. Internal consistency was tested using Cronbach's . Testing of psychometric properties included the calculation of inter-item correlations and corrected item-total correlations. Spearman's rho was used to investigate associations. Exploratory principal component analyses with Kaiser normalisation were performed. One hundred and twenty-one patients (51 males) with cochlear implants (27-88 years,  = 59). For IOI-CI, Cronbach's was 0.79. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.29 to 0.69. The factor analysis revealed two components. For APHAB, Cronbach's was 0.91. Two components were revealed by the factor analysis. Corrected item-total correlations for the two subscales "communication in quiet situations" and "communication in adverse situations" were 0.47-0.81 and 0.58-0.80, respectively. The convergent validity of the questionnaires was adequate as reflected by a Spearman's coefficient of 0.67. Both questionnaires show good psychometric properties.
ISSN:1499-2027
1708-8186
DOI:10.1080/14992027.2021.1937719