Biomechanical performance of the cranio‐mandibular complex of the small notosuchian Araripesuchus gomesii (Notosuchia, Uruguaysuchidae)

• Published in: Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) N.J. : 2007), 2022-10, Vol.305 (10), p.2695-2707
• Main Authors: Nieto, Mauro N., Degrange, Federico J., Sellers, Kaleb C., Pol, Diego, Holliday, Casey M.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Araripesuchus; Araripesuchus gomesii; biomechanics; Biting; Cretaceous; finite element analysis; Finite element method; Mechanical properties; Notosuchia; paleobiology; Phylogeny; Prey; Skull
• ISSN: 1932-8486; 1932-8494
• DOI: 10.1002/ar.24697

Notosuchia is a clade of crocodyliforms that was highly successful and diverse in the Cretaceous of Gondwana. Araripesuchus gomesii is a small notosuchian from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil that belongs to Uruguaysuchidae, one of the subgroups of notosuchians that first radiated, during the Aptian–Albian. Here we present a finite element analysis of A. gomesii based on a model reconstructed from CT scans and performed using published bone properties for crocodiles. The adductor musculature and their respective attachment areas were reconstructed based on Extant Phylogenetic Bracket. Different functional scenarios were tested applying an estimated 158 N bite force: unilateral bite, bilateral bite, pullback, head‐shake, and head‐twist. The results obtained were compared with those of Alligator mississippiensis, one of its closest living relatives. In the different simulations, the skull and lower jaws of Araripesuchus suffers more stress in the head‐shake movement, followed by the unilateral and pullback bites with stress focalized in the premaxillary region. In contrast, the head‐twist is the one with smaller stress values. Araripesuchus possess an oreinirostral skull that may provide greater overall resistance in the different scenarios on average, unlike Alligator that has a platyrostral skull with less resistance to dorsoventral mechanical loads. Previous hypotheses that considered A. gomesii as omnivorous coupled with our results, its small size, and likely limited bite force, suggest this taxon probably fed on small prey and other trophic items that could catch and handle entirely with its mouth, such as insects and small vertebrates.