Loading…

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives

Approach to the management of early stage cervical cancers with tumor size >2 cm in women who desire fertility preservation has been fraught with controversy. Fertility sparing surgery for FIGO 2018 stage IB cancers has been validated most for tumors ≤2 cm. In this review, our objective was to ev...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gynecologic oncology 2021-09, Vol.162 (3), p.809-815
Main Authors: Gwacham, Nnamdi I., McKenzie, Nathalie D., Fitzgerald, Evan R., Ahmad, Sarfraz, Holloway, Robert W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3
container_end_page 815
container_issue 3
container_start_page 809
container_title Gynecologic oncology
container_volume 162
creator Gwacham, Nnamdi I.
McKenzie, Nathalie D.
Fitzgerald, Evan R.
Ahmad, Sarfraz
Holloway, Robert W.
description Approach to the management of early stage cervical cancers with tumor size >2 cm in women who desire fertility preservation has been fraught with controversy. Fertility sparing surgery for FIGO 2018 stage IB cancers has been validated most for tumors ≤2 cm. In this review, our objective was to evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes for women that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before fertility sparing surgery for tumors 2–4 cm. We performed a systematic literature review and searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews and UpToDate (from January 2000 to February 2021) using the terms: cervical cancer, fertility preservation, trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cervical cancer treatment, stage IB1 or IB2 cervical cancer, and cervical cancer size 2–4 cm. We included manuscripts with information on patients with tumor sizes 2–4 cm, lymph node status, follow-up, obstetric and oncologic outcome. We excluded review articles or articles without all pertinent patient information. Eighteen articles were identified including 249 patients. For final analysis, 114 met inclusion criteria. All included patients had FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent fertility sparing surgery. Vaginal radical trachelectomy, cold knife conization, abdominal radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic radical trachelectomy, simple vaginal trachelectomy, and cone laser were performed in 46 (40.4%), 26 (22.8%), 14 (12.3%), 13 (11.4%), 8 (7%), and 7 (6.1%) women, respectively. The most common regimen of chemotherapy was platinum-based therapy with cisplatin. The follow-up time reported in all studies ranged from 1 to 225 months. Of 64 attempted pregnancies, there were 49 (76.6%) viable deliveries which included 6 preterm births (9.4%). The recurrence rate was 6.1% and two patients (1.8%) died of disease. Fertility sparing surgery following NACT is an option for women with cervical cancers that are 2–4 cm that wish to preserve fertility without sacrificing oncologic or obstetric outcomes. Confirmation of these findings are anticipated from an ongoing international phase II clinical trial [1]. [Display omitted] •Response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is 92% for cervical cancer 2–4 cm.•Recurrence rate is 6.1% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy & fertility sparing surgery.•Obstetric outcomes appear to be favorable in this subset of patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.006
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2541784178</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0090825821004868</els_id><sourcerecordid>2541784178</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi0E4paDJ0BCLmkSxnaSdYQo0Il_0gkaqC2vPd7zKomD7ewpVHQ8AG_Ik-BlD0qK0Uzx-2Y030fIUwY1A9a9ONTrfp1CzYGzGroaoLtHNgz6tupk298nG4AeKslbeUEepXQAAAGMPyQXomECZMc35MdHDNoelqOeMjU3OIZ8g1HPK3VhGMItWrorM8bsB59XmmYd_bSnaYl7jCv1EzUYj97ogRo9lTnR5L8h5b--_2yoGV9SHDHuTxqrs6Z6stQteYlI5wLPaLI_YnpMHjg9JHxy1y_Jl7dvPl-9r64_vftw9fq6MqLtc-W07N0WG82t5NAwtLgzTlg0bScM6yTwhrMtsL5rjEAhm60TO6e51rKY5sQleX7eO8fwdcGU1eiTwWHQE4YlKd42bCtPVVBxRk0MKUV0ao5-1HFVDNQpAXVQfxJQpwQUdKokUFTP7g4suxHtP81fywvw6gxgefPoMapkPBbnrI_FDGWD_--B38hjnFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2541784178</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gwacham, Nnamdi I. ; McKenzie, Nathalie D. ; Fitzgerald, Evan R. ; Ahmad, Sarfraz ; Holloway, Robert W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gwacham, Nnamdi I. ; McKenzie, Nathalie D. ; Fitzgerald, Evan R. ; Ahmad, Sarfraz ; Holloway, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><description>Approach to the management of early stage cervical cancers with tumor size &gt;2 cm in women who desire fertility preservation has been fraught with controversy. Fertility sparing surgery for FIGO 2018 stage IB cancers has been validated most for tumors ≤2 cm. In this review, our objective was to evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes for women that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before fertility sparing surgery for tumors 2–4 cm. We performed a systematic literature review and searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews and UpToDate (from January 2000 to February 2021) using the terms: cervical cancer, fertility preservation, trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cervical cancer treatment, stage IB1 or IB2 cervical cancer, and cervical cancer size 2–4 cm. We included manuscripts with information on patients with tumor sizes 2–4 cm, lymph node status, follow-up, obstetric and oncologic outcome. We excluded review articles or articles without all pertinent patient information. Eighteen articles were identified including 249 patients. For final analysis, 114 met inclusion criteria. All included patients had FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent fertility sparing surgery. Vaginal radical trachelectomy, cold knife conization, abdominal radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic radical trachelectomy, simple vaginal trachelectomy, and cone laser were performed in 46 (40.4%), 26 (22.8%), 14 (12.3%), 13 (11.4%), 8 (7%), and 7 (6.1%) women, respectively. The most common regimen of chemotherapy was platinum-based therapy with cisplatin. The follow-up time reported in all studies ranged from 1 to 225 months. Of 64 attempted pregnancies, there were 49 (76.6%) viable deliveries which included 6 preterm births (9.4%). The recurrence rate was 6.1% and two patients (1.8%) died of disease. Fertility sparing surgery following NACT is an option for women with cervical cancers that are 2–4 cm that wish to preserve fertility without sacrificing oncologic or obstetric outcomes. Confirmation of these findings are anticipated from an ongoing international phase II clinical trial [1]. [Display omitted] •Response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is 92% for cervical cancer 2–4 cm.•Recurrence rate is 6.1% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy &amp; fertility sparing surgery.•Obstetric outcomes appear to be favorable in this subset of patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-8258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-6859</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34130862</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cervical cancer ; Female ; Fertility preservation ; Fertility Preservation - methods ; Fertility sparing surgery ; Humans ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods ; Oncologic outcomes ; Pregnancy ; Recurrence ; Tumor 2–4 cm ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology ; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><ispartof>Gynecologic oncology, 2021-09, Vol.162 (3), p.809-815</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34130862$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gwacham, Nnamdi I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Nathalie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Evan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Sarfraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><title>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives</title><title>Gynecologic oncology</title><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><description>Approach to the management of early stage cervical cancers with tumor size &gt;2 cm in women who desire fertility preservation has been fraught with controversy. Fertility sparing surgery for FIGO 2018 stage IB cancers has been validated most for tumors ≤2 cm. In this review, our objective was to evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes for women that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before fertility sparing surgery for tumors 2–4 cm. We performed a systematic literature review and searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews and UpToDate (from January 2000 to February 2021) using the terms: cervical cancer, fertility preservation, trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cervical cancer treatment, stage IB1 or IB2 cervical cancer, and cervical cancer size 2–4 cm. We included manuscripts with information on patients with tumor sizes 2–4 cm, lymph node status, follow-up, obstetric and oncologic outcome. We excluded review articles or articles without all pertinent patient information. Eighteen articles were identified including 249 patients. For final analysis, 114 met inclusion criteria. All included patients had FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent fertility sparing surgery. Vaginal radical trachelectomy, cold knife conization, abdominal radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic radical trachelectomy, simple vaginal trachelectomy, and cone laser were performed in 46 (40.4%), 26 (22.8%), 14 (12.3%), 13 (11.4%), 8 (7%), and 7 (6.1%) women, respectively. The most common regimen of chemotherapy was platinum-based therapy with cisplatin. The follow-up time reported in all studies ranged from 1 to 225 months. Of 64 attempted pregnancies, there were 49 (76.6%) viable deliveries which included 6 preterm births (9.4%). The recurrence rate was 6.1% and two patients (1.8%) died of disease. Fertility sparing surgery following NACT is an option for women with cervical cancers that are 2–4 cm that wish to preserve fertility without sacrificing oncologic or obstetric outcomes. Confirmation of these findings are anticipated from an ongoing international phase II clinical trial [1]. [Display omitted] •Response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is 92% for cervical cancer 2–4 cm.•Recurrence rate is 6.1% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy &amp; fertility sparing surgery.•Obstetric outcomes appear to be favorable in this subset of patients.</description><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility preservation</subject><subject>Fertility Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Fertility sparing surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical Oncology - methods</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Oncologic outcomes</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Tumor 2–4 cm</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</subject><issn>0090-8258</issn><issn>1095-6859</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kb-O1DAQxi0E4paDJ0BCLmkSxnaSdYQo0Il_0gkaqC2vPd7zKomD7ewpVHQ8AG_Ik-BlD0qK0Uzx-2Y030fIUwY1A9a9ONTrfp1CzYGzGroaoLtHNgz6tupk298nG4AeKslbeUEepXQAAAGMPyQXomECZMc35MdHDNoelqOeMjU3OIZ8g1HPK3VhGMItWrorM8bsB59XmmYd_bSnaYl7jCv1EzUYj97ogRo9lTnR5L8h5b--_2yoGV9SHDHuTxqrs6Z6stQteYlI5wLPaLI_YnpMHjg9JHxy1y_Jl7dvPl-9r64_vftw9fq6MqLtc-W07N0WG82t5NAwtLgzTlg0bScM6yTwhrMtsL5rjEAhm60TO6e51rKY5sQleX7eO8fwdcGU1eiTwWHQE4YlKd42bCtPVVBxRk0MKUV0ao5-1HFVDNQpAXVQfxJQpwQUdKokUFTP7g4suxHtP81fywvw6gxgefPoMapkPBbnrI_FDGWD_--B38hjnFo</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Gwacham, Nnamdi I.</creator><creator>McKenzie, Nathalie D.</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, Evan R.</creator><creator>Ahmad, Sarfraz</creator><creator>Holloway, Robert W.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives</title><author>Gwacham, Nnamdi I. ; McKenzie, Nathalie D. ; Fitzgerald, Evan R. ; Ahmad, Sarfraz ; Holloway, Robert W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility preservation</topic><topic>Fertility Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Fertility sparing surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical Oncology - methods</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Oncologic outcomes</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Tumor 2–4 cm</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gwacham, Nnamdi I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKenzie, Nathalie D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, Evan R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Sarfraz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holloway, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gwacham, Nnamdi I.</au><au>McKenzie, Nathalie D.</au><au>Fitzgerald, Evan R.</au><au>Ahmad, Sarfraz</au><au>Holloway, Robert W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives</atitle><jtitle>Gynecologic oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Gynecol Oncol</addtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>809</spage><epage>815</epage><pages>809-815</pages><issn>0090-8258</issn><eissn>1095-6859</eissn><abstract>Approach to the management of early stage cervical cancers with tumor size &gt;2 cm in women who desire fertility preservation has been fraught with controversy. Fertility sparing surgery for FIGO 2018 stage IB cancers has been validated most for tumors ≤2 cm. In this review, our objective was to evaluate the oncologic and obstetric outcomes for women that underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) before fertility sparing surgery for tumors 2–4 cm. We performed a systematic literature review and searched PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Reviews and UpToDate (from January 2000 to February 2021) using the terms: cervical cancer, fertility preservation, trachelectomy, radical trachelectomy, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, cervical cancer treatment, stage IB1 or IB2 cervical cancer, and cervical cancer size 2–4 cm. We included manuscripts with information on patients with tumor sizes 2–4 cm, lymph node status, follow-up, obstetric and oncologic outcome. We excluded review articles or articles without all pertinent patient information. Eighteen articles were identified including 249 patients. For final analysis, 114 met inclusion criteria. All included patients had FIGO 2018 stage IB2 cervical cancer, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent fertility sparing surgery. Vaginal radical trachelectomy, cold knife conization, abdominal radical trachelectomy, laparoscopic radical trachelectomy, simple vaginal trachelectomy, and cone laser were performed in 46 (40.4%), 26 (22.8%), 14 (12.3%), 13 (11.4%), 8 (7%), and 7 (6.1%) women, respectively. The most common regimen of chemotherapy was platinum-based therapy with cisplatin. The follow-up time reported in all studies ranged from 1 to 225 months. Of 64 attempted pregnancies, there were 49 (76.6%) viable deliveries which included 6 preterm births (9.4%). The recurrence rate was 6.1% and two patients (1.8%) died of disease. Fertility sparing surgery following NACT is an option for women with cervical cancers that are 2–4 cm that wish to preserve fertility without sacrificing oncologic or obstetric outcomes. Confirmation of these findings are anticipated from an ongoing international phase II clinical trial [1]. [Display omitted] •Response rate to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is 92% for cervical cancer 2–4 cm.•Recurrence rate is 6.1% after neoadjuvant chemotherapy &amp; fertility sparing surgery.•Obstetric outcomes appear to be favorable in this subset of patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>34130862</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.006</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0090-8258
ispartof Gynecologic oncology, 2021-09, Vol.162 (3), p.809-815
issn 0090-8258
1095-6859
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2541784178
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Cervical cancer
Female
Fertility preservation
Fertility Preservation - methods
Fertility sparing surgery
Humans
Medical Oncology - methods
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - methods
Oncologic outcomes
Pregnancy
Recurrence
Tumor 2–4 cm
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - drug therapy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - pathology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
title Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility sparing surgery in cervical cancers size 2–4 cm; emerging data and future perspectives
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T13%3A39%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Neoadjuvant%20chemotherapy%20followed%20by%20fertility%20sparing%20surgery%20in%20cervical%20cancers%20size%202%E2%80%934%20cm;%20emerging%20data%20and%20future%20perspectives&rft.jtitle=Gynecologic%20oncology&rft.au=Gwacham,%20Nnamdi%20I.&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=809&rft.epage=815&rft.pages=809-815&rft.issn=0090-8258&rft.eissn=1095-6859&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.06.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2541784178%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-fa89f7e4a2d82041edebcf3dec563c16802421701964c3e3847f3bfa2aa8101f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2541784178&rft_id=info:pmid/34130862&rfr_iscdi=true