Dietary Sodium 'Controversy'—Issues and Potential Solutions

• Published in: Current nutrition reports 2021-09, Vol.10 (3), p.188-199
• Main Authors: Campbell, N. R. C., He, F. J., Cappuccio, F. P., MacGregor, G. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cardiology; Clinical Nutrition; Diabetes; Health Promotion and Disease Prevention; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Oncology; Public Health Nutrition (KE Charlton; Section Editor; Topical Collection on Public Health Nutrition
• ISSN: 2161-3311; 2161-3311
• DOI: 10.1007/s13668-021-00357-1

Purpose of Review High dietary sodium is estimated to be the leading dietary risk for death attributed to 1.8 million deaths in 2019. There are uniform recommendations to reduce sodium consumption based on evidence that increased dietary sodium is responsible for approximately a third of the prevalence of hypertension, and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials show that sodium reduction lowers blood pressure, cardiovascular disease, and total mortality. Nevertheless, there is a perception that the beneficial effect of reducing dietary sodium is controversial. We provide experiential evidence relating to some sources of the controversy and propose potential solutions. Recent Findings Inappropriate research methodology, lack of rigor in research, conflicts of interest and commercial bias, questions of professional conduct, and lack of policies to protect public interests are likely to contribute to the controversy about reducing dietary sodium. Summary There is a failure to protect policies to reduce dietary sodium from nonscientific threats. Significant efforts need to be made to ensure the integrity of nutritional research and maintain public trust.