Loading…

Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study

Introduction. Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that may lead to sepsis and even death. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The aims of this prospective study are to establish normal amylase levels and investigate elevated amylase levels, espec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Surgical innovation 2022-02, Vol.29 (1), p.44-49
Main Authors: Horn, Amyt, Assalia, Ahmad, Sayida, Sa’d, Mahajna, Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-b3432ec6d223d41c397c340077eb3da702fb4fe06c938eb2c8462f4490ecaf473
container_end_page 49
container_issue 1
container_start_page 44
container_title Surgical innovation
container_volume 29
creator Horn, Amyt
Assalia, Ahmad
Sayida, Sa’d
Mahajna, Ahmad
description Introduction. Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that may lead to sepsis and even death. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The aims of this prospective study are to establish normal amylase levels and investigate elevated amylase levels, especially in the drain, for detecting anastomotic leakage following LSG. Material and Methods. One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent LSG during 1 year at Rambam Health Care Campus were included prospectively in the study. Demographic and medical background, peri- and postoperative complications, and laboratory data including amylase levels in blood, urine, and drain were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine independent variables that can predict increases in amylase values. Results. Thirty-five (21.8%) patients had high levels of amylase in blood, urine, and/or drain and 126 (78.2%) normal values of amylase until discharge. No significant differences were found in operation duration, length of hospitalization, or occurrence of complications. One patient had a staple-line leak diagnosed in the third postoperative day that was treated conservatively with endoscopic approach. His amylase levels in the blood and drain were normal, with only a slight hyperamylasuria. Conclusions. High amylase levels after LSG does not necessarily indicate a major complication such as staple-line leak, and in the vast majority of cases, it seems to have no clinical relevancy. Therefore, it should not automatically lead to a full investigation in the absence of further clinical signs. It is suggested that there is no clinical justification to test amylase routinely after LSG.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/15533506211027830
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543456072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_15533506211027830</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2543456072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-b3432ec6d223d41c397c340077eb3da702fb4fe06c938eb2c8462f4490ecaf473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGI4j-AC9mj16K-9kFb0QFSYiaIOdmu52S4raL3VbTf-8SkIuJh8lMZp55M_MidE3JkFKl7qiUnEsSM0oJUyNOTlB_14u4pOL0WJO4hy683xAiJCXyHPW4oELEUvRRMSk7qz3guccvrsEarzzkrcXzKiuMblyN8xAL0B96DfgRGjBN4So8dda676Ja46UF-AI8076pw9CV3T2e4Lfa-e2ODaNl02bdJTrLtfVwdcgDtJo-vT88R4vX2fxhsogMY6yJUi44AxNnjPFMUMPHynBBiFKQ8kwrwvJU5EBiM-YjSJkZiZjlQowJGJ0LxQfodq-7rd1nC75JysIbsFZX4FqfMCm4kDFRLKB0j5pwrK8hT7Z1Ueq6SyhJdg4nfxwOOzcH-TYtITtu_FoagOEe8MGwZOPaugrv_qP4A5Kugq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2543456072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Horn, Amyt ; Assalia, Ahmad ; Sayida, Sa’d ; Mahajna, Ahmad</creator><creatorcontrib>Horn, Amyt ; Assalia, Ahmad ; Sayida, Sa’d ; Mahajna, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction. Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that may lead to sepsis and even death. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The aims of this prospective study are to establish normal amylase levels and investigate elevated amylase levels, especially in the drain, for detecting anastomotic leakage following LSG. Material and Methods. One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent LSG during 1 year at Rambam Health Care Campus were included prospectively in the study. Demographic and medical background, peri- and postoperative complications, and laboratory data including amylase levels in blood, urine, and drain were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine independent variables that can predict increases in amylase values. Results. Thirty-five (21.8%) patients had high levels of amylase in blood, urine, and/or drain and 126 (78.2%) normal values of amylase until discharge. No significant differences were found in operation duration, length of hospitalization, or occurrence of complications. One patient had a staple-line leak diagnosed in the third postoperative day that was treated conservatively with endoscopic approach. His amylase levels in the blood and drain were normal, with only a slight hyperamylasuria. Conclusions. High amylase levels after LSG does not necessarily indicate a major complication such as staple-line leak, and in the vast majority of cases, it seems to have no clinical relevancy. Therefore, it should not automatically lead to a full investigation in the absence of further clinical signs. It is suggested that there is no clinical justification to test amylase routinely after LSG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1553-3506</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1553-3514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/15533506211027830</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34144654</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Amylases - analysis ; Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis ; Anastomotic Leak - etiology ; Anastomotic Leak - surgery ; Gastrectomy - adverse effects ; Gastrectomy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Obesity, Morbid - surgery ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical innovation, 2022-02, Vol.29 (1), p.44-49</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-b3432ec6d223d41c397c340077eb3da702fb4fe06c938eb2c8462f4490ecaf473</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4424-0551</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34144654$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Horn, Amyt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assalia, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayida, Sa’d</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajna, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><title>Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study</title><title>Surgical innovation</title><addtitle>Surg Innov</addtitle><description>Introduction. Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that may lead to sepsis and even death. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The aims of this prospective study are to establish normal amylase levels and investigate elevated amylase levels, especially in the drain, for detecting anastomotic leakage following LSG. Material and Methods. One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent LSG during 1 year at Rambam Health Care Campus were included prospectively in the study. Demographic and medical background, peri- and postoperative complications, and laboratory data including amylase levels in blood, urine, and drain were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine independent variables that can predict increases in amylase values. Results. Thirty-five (21.8%) patients had high levels of amylase in blood, urine, and/or drain and 126 (78.2%) normal values of amylase until discharge. No significant differences were found in operation duration, length of hospitalization, or occurrence of complications. One patient had a staple-line leak diagnosed in the third postoperative day that was treated conservatively with endoscopic approach. His amylase levels in the blood and drain were normal, with only a slight hyperamylasuria. Conclusions. High amylase levels after LSG does not necessarily indicate a major complication such as staple-line leak, and in the vast majority of cases, it seems to have no clinical relevancy. Therefore, it should not automatically lead to a full investigation in the absence of further clinical signs. It is suggested that there is no clinical justification to test amylase routinely after LSG.</description><subject>Amylases - analysis</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</subject><subject>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Gastrectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1553-3506</issn><issn>1553-3514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGI4j-AC9mj16K-9kFb0QFSYiaIOdmu52S4raL3VbTf-8SkIuJh8lMZp55M_MidE3JkFKl7qiUnEsSM0oJUyNOTlB_14u4pOL0WJO4hy683xAiJCXyHPW4oELEUvRRMSk7qz3guccvrsEarzzkrcXzKiuMblyN8xAL0B96DfgRGjBN4So8dda676Ja46UF-AI8076pw9CV3T2e4Lfa-e2ODaNl02bdJTrLtfVwdcgDtJo-vT88R4vX2fxhsogMY6yJUi44AxNnjPFMUMPHynBBiFKQ8kwrwvJU5EBiM-YjSJkZiZjlQowJGJ0LxQfodq-7rd1nC75JysIbsFZX4FqfMCm4kDFRLKB0j5pwrK8hT7Z1Ueq6SyhJdg4nfxwOOzcH-TYtITtu_FoagOEe8MGwZOPaugrv_qP4A5Kugq0</recordid><startdate>202202</startdate><enddate>202202</enddate><creator>Horn, Amyt</creator><creator>Assalia, Ahmad</creator><creator>Sayida, Sa’d</creator><creator>Mahajna, Ahmad</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-0551</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202202</creationdate><title>Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study</title><author>Horn, Amyt ; Assalia, Ahmad ; Sayida, Sa’d ; Mahajna, Ahmad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-b3432ec6d223d41c397c340077eb3da702fb4fe06c938eb2c8462f4490ecaf473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Amylases - analysis</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - etiology</topic><topic>Anastomotic Leak - surgery</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Gastrectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Obesity, Morbid - surgery</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Horn, Amyt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assalia, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayida, Sa’d</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mahajna, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical innovation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Horn, Amyt</au><au>Assalia, Ahmad</au><au>Sayida, Sa’d</au><au>Mahajna, Ahmad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study</atitle><jtitle>Surgical innovation</jtitle><addtitle>Surg Innov</addtitle><date>2022-02</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>44</spage><epage>49</epage><pages>44-49</pages><issn>1553-3506</issn><eissn>1553-3514</eissn><abstract>Introduction. Gastric leak after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a severe complication that may lead to sepsis and even death. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical. The aims of this prospective study are to establish normal amylase levels and investigate elevated amylase levels, especially in the drain, for detecting anastomotic leakage following LSG. Material and Methods. One hundred sixty-one patients who underwent LSG during 1 year at Rambam Health Care Campus were included prospectively in the study. Demographic and medical background, peri- and postoperative complications, and laboratory data including amylase levels in blood, urine, and drain were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to examine independent variables that can predict increases in amylase values. Results. Thirty-five (21.8%) patients had high levels of amylase in blood, urine, and/or drain and 126 (78.2%) normal values of amylase until discharge. No significant differences were found in operation duration, length of hospitalization, or occurrence of complications. One patient had a staple-line leak diagnosed in the third postoperative day that was treated conservatively with endoscopic approach. His amylase levels in the blood and drain were normal, with only a slight hyperamylasuria. Conclusions. High amylase levels after LSG does not necessarily indicate a major complication such as staple-line leak, and in the vast majority of cases, it seems to have no clinical relevancy. Therefore, it should not automatically lead to a full investigation in the absence of further clinical signs. It is suggested that there is no clinical justification to test amylase routinely after LSG.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>34144654</pmid><doi>10.1177/15533506211027830</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4424-0551</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1553-3506
ispartof Surgical innovation, 2022-02, Vol.29 (1), p.44-49
issn 1553-3506
1553-3514
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2543456072
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
subjects Amylases - analysis
Anastomotic Leak - diagnosis
Anastomotic Leak - etiology
Anastomotic Leak - surgery
Gastrectomy - adverse effects
Gastrectomy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Obesity, Morbid - surgery
Prospective Studies
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
title Amylase Is Not a Useful Indicator for Leakage Detection Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Prospective Study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amylase%20Is%20Not%20a%20Useful%20Indicator%20for%20Leakage%20Detection%20Following%20Sleeve%20Gastrectomy:%20A%20Prospective%20Study&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20innovation&rft.au=Horn,%20Amyt&rft.date=2022-02&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=44&rft.epage=49&rft.pages=44-49&rft.issn=1553-3506&rft.eissn=1553-3514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/15533506211027830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2543456072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c222t-b3432ec6d223d41c397c340077eb3da702fb4fe06c938eb2c8462f4490ecaf473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2543456072&rft_id=info:pmid/34144654&rft_sage_id=10.1177_15533506211027830&rfr_iscdi=true