Federal Regulation and Mortality in the 50 States

Previous research speculates that some regulations are counterproductive in the sense that they increase (rather than decrease) mortality risk. However, few empirical studies have measured the extent to which this phenomenon holds across the regulatory system as a whole. Using a novel U.S. state pan...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk analysis 2022-03, Vol.42 (3), p.592-613
Main Authors: Broughel, James, Chambers, Dustin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Credibility
Empirical analysis
Expenditures
Federal regulation
Health risks
Mortality
Mortality risk
mortality risk analysis
Panel data
Policy making
RegData
Regulation
Risk
Risk analysis
Risk Assessment
State regulations
States
United States
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previous research speculates that some regulations are counterproductive in the sense that they increase (rather than decrease) mortality risk. However, few empirical studies have measured the extent to which this phenomenon holds across the regulatory system as a whole. Using a novel U.S. state panel data set spanning the period 2000–2014, we estimate the effect of U.S. federal regulation on state‐level mortality. We find that a 1% increase in federal regulation of state economies is associated with an increase in an index of state mortality of between 0.53% and 1.35%. These findings are robust to the form of mortality measure, choice of covariates, and the inclusion/exclusion of various regions, states, and industries. We also provide an update of the “cost‐per‐life saved cutoff,” which is the counterproductive risk threshold for expenditures. We find that expenditures in excess of $38.6 million (2019 dollars) per life saved can be expected to increase mortality risk. This article fills an important gap in the empirical literature and boosts the credibility of mortality risk analysis, whereby public policymakers weigh both the expected lives saved and lost due to a proposed regulation or other policy.
ISSN:0272-4332
1539-6924
DOI:10.1111/risa.13774