Loading…

Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study

Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods In this case–control study, 44 patients with MFS (87 eyes) were compared to 44 controls (88 eyes), who were matched for age and sex. The subjects were asked...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England) England), 2022-05, Vol.100 (3), p.337-343
Main Authors: Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth, Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend, Drolsum, Liv, Kristianslund, Olav
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3
container_end_page 343
container_issue 3
container_start_page 337
container_title Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)
container_volume 100
creator Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth
Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend
Drolsum, Liv
Kristianslund, Olav
description Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods In this case–control study, 44 patients with MFS (87 eyes) were compared to 44 controls (88 eyes), who were matched for age and sex. The subjects were asked to grade their photophobia and glare using 10‐cm visual analogue scales (VAS), which were marked with ‘never’ at zero and ‘always’ at 10 ‐cm. In addition, disability glare was measured with C‐Quant straylight meter. Results The patients with MFS had significantly higher VAS scores than the controls in four out of seven statements related to photophobia and glare. When including cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature, three of the seven statements were still significantly different between the two groups. The mean straylight values were 1.29 ± 0.03 log(s) in the MFS group and 1.01 ± 0.03 log(s) in the control group (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aos.14935
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545595881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2545595881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUQIMoPkYX_oAE3OhinObZ1p2IL1AUVHAXbtPEiXSaMUmR7vwH_9AvsTrqQvBu7l0cDpeD0DbJDsgwE_DxgPCSiSW0TnIhxiyXxfLvLR7W0EaMT1kmiZR8Fa0xTnLGOFtH6mbqk59PfeUAQ1vj2kWoXONSjx8bCAa7FkPdNQnPITnTpohfXJriKwgWWhz7tg5-Zg4xYA3RvL--ad-m4BscU1f3m2jFQhPN1vceofvTk7vj8_Hl9dnF8dHlWLOiEOM6t6SsqM5pJXTBMl0SkdtaG24LXnBhtS0zK6xkMrOMS1JKA4wyJiiDPAc2QnsL7zz4587EpGYuatM00BrfRUUFF6IURUEGdPcP-uS70A7fKSp5ScuMUjFQ-wtKBx9jMFbNg5tB6BXJ1Gd1NVRXX9UHdufb2FUzU_-SP5kHYLIAXlxj-v9N6uj6dqH8ALNXjFo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2649290225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth ; Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend ; Drolsum, Liv ; Kristianslund, Olav</creator><creatorcontrib>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth ; Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend ; Drolsum, Liv ; Kristianslund, Olav</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods In this case–control study, 44 patients with MFS (87 eyes) were compared to 44 controls (88 eyes), who were matched for age and sex. The subjects were asked to grade their photophobia and glare using 10‐cm visual analogue scales (VAS), which were marked with ‘never’ at zero and ‘always’ at 10 ‐cm. In addition, disability glare was measured with C‐Quant straylight meter. Results The patients with MFS had significantly higher VAS scores than the controls in four out of seven statements related to photophobia and glare. When including cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature, three of the seven statements were still significantly different between the two groups. The mean straylight values were 1.29 ± 0.03 log(s) in the MFS group and 1.01 ± 0.03 log(s) in the control group (p &lt; 0.001, mixed model). These differences remained significant after adjusting for cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature. Conclusion Patients with MFS reported more photophobia and had a higher straylight value than the control group. Awareness of these findings of more photophobia and glare in the MFS patients is important when counselling and treating these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1755-375X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1755-3768</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aos.14935</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34173343</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Case-Control Studies ; Cataract ; Cataracts ; Cornea ; disability glare ; Glare ; Humans ; Iris ; Light ; Marfan syndrome ; Marfan Syndrome - complications ; Marfan Syndrome - diagnosis ; ocular straylight ; Patients ; photophobia ; Photophobia - diagnosis ; Photophobia - etiology ; Scandals ; Scattering, Radiation ; Visual Acuity</subject><ispartof>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-05, Vol.100 (3), p.337-343</ispartof><rights>2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5351-6834 ; 0000-0003-3390-9811</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34173343$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolsum, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristianslund, Olav</creatorcontrib><title>Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study</title><title>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods In this case–control study, 44 patients with MFS (87 eyes) were compared to 44 controls (88 eyes), who were matched for age and sex. The subjects were asked to grade their photophobia and glare using 10‐cm visual analogue scales (VAS), which were marked with ‘never’ at zero and ‘always’ at 10 ‐cm. In addition, disability glare was measured with C‐Quant straylight meter. Results The patients with MFS had significantly higher VAS scores than the controls in four out of seven statements related to photophobia and glare. When including cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature, three of the seven statements were still significantly different between the two groups. The mean straylight values were 1.29 ± 0.03 log(s) in the MFS group and 1.01 ± 0.03 log(s) in the control group (p &lt; 0.001, mixed model). These differences remained significant after adjusting for cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature. Conclusion Patients with MFS reported more photophobia and had a higher straylight value than the control group. Awareness of these findings of more photophobia and glare in the MFS patients is important when counselling and treating these patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Case-Control Studies</subject><subject>Cataract</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Cornea</subject><subject>disability glare</subject><subject>Glare</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Iris</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Marfan syndrome</subject><subject>Marfan Syndrome - complications</subject><subject>Marfan Syndrome - diagnosis</subject><subject>ocular straylight</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>photophobia</subject><subject>Photophobia - diagnosis</subject><subject>Photophobia - etiology</subject><subject>Scandals</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Visual Acuity</subject><issn>1755-375X</issn><issn>1755-3768</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUQIMoPkYX_oAE3OhinObZ1p2IL1AUVHAXbtPEiXSaMUmR7vwH_9AvsTrqQvBu7l0cDpeD0DbJDsgwE_DxgPCSiSW0TnIhxiyXxfLvLR7W0EaMT1kmiZR8Fa0xTnLGOFtH6mbqk59PfeUAQ1vj2kWoXONSjx8bCAa7FkPdNQnPITnTpohfXJriKwgWWhz7tg5-Zg4xYA3RvL--ad-m4BscU1f3m2jFQhPN1vceofvTk7vj8_Hl9dnF8dHlWLOiEOM6t6SsqM5pJXTBMl0SkdtaG24LXnBhtS0zK6xkMrOMS1JKA4wyJiiDPAc2QnsL7zz4587EpGYuatM00BrfRUUFF6IURUEGdPcP-uS70A7fKSp5ScuMUjFQ-wtKBx9jMFbNg5tB6BXJ1Gd1NVRXX9UHdufb2FUzU_-SP5kHYLIAXlxj-v9N6uj6dqH8ALNXjFo</recordid><startdate>202205</startdate><enddate>202205</enddate><creator>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth</creator><creator>Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend</creator><creator>Drolsum, Liv</creator><creator>Kristianslund, Olav</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-6834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-9811</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202205</creationdate><title>Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study</title><author>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth ; Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend ; Drolsum, Liv ; Kristianslund, Olav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Case-Control Studies</topic><topic>Cataract</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Cornea</topic><topic>disability glare</topic><topic>Glare</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Iris</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Marfan syndrome</topic><topic>Marfan Syndrome - complications</topic><topic>Marfan Syndrome - diagnosis</topic><topic>ocular straylight</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>photophobia</topic><topic>Photophobia - diagnosis</topic><topic>Photophobia - etiology</topic><topic>Scandals</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Visual Acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drolsum, Liv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kristianslund, Olav</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sandvik, Gunhild Falleth</au><au>Rand‐Hendriksen, Svend</au><au>Drolsum, Liv</au><au>Kristianslund, Olav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study</atitle><jtitle>Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2022-05</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>337</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>337-343</pages><issn>1755-375X</issn><eissn>1755-3768</eissn><abstract>Purpose The aim of the present study was to investigate photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Methods In this case–control study, 44 patients with MFS (87 eyes) were compared to 44 controls (88 eyes), who were matched for age and sex. The subjects were asked to grade their photophobia and glare using 10‐cm visual analogue scales (VAS), which were marked with ‘never’ at zero and ‘always’ at 10 ‐cm. In addition, disability glare was measured with C‐Quant straylight meter. Results The patients with MFS had significantly higher VAS scores than the controls in four out of seven statements related to photophobia and glare. When including cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature, three of the seven statements were still significantly different between the two groups. The mean straylight values were 1.29 ± 0.03 log(s) in the MFS group and 1.01 ± 0.03 log(s) in the control group (p &lt; 0.001, mixed model). These differences remained significant after adjusting for cataract, spherical equivalent, iris colour, axial length and corneal curvature. Conclusion Patients with MFS reported more photophobia and had a higher straylight value than the control group. Awareness of these findings of more photophobia and glare in the MFS patients is important when counselling and treating these patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34173343</pmid><doi>10.1111/aos.14935</doi><tpages>343</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5351-6834</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-9811</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1755-375X
ispartof Acta ophthalmologica (Oxford, England), 2022-05, Vol.100 (3), p.337-343
issn 1755-375X
1755-3768
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2545595881
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Adult
Case-Control Studies
Cataract
Cataracts
Cornea
disability glare
Glare
Humans
Iris
Light
Marfan syndrome
Marfan Syndrome - complications
Marfan Syndrome - diagnosis
ocular straylight
Patients
photophobia
Photophobia - diagnosis
Photophobia - etiology
Scandals
Scattering, Radiation
Visual Acuity
title Photophobia and disability glare in adult patients with Marfan syndrome: a case–control study
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A00%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Photophobia%20and%20disability%20glare%20in%20adult%20patients%20with%20Marfan%20syndrome:%20a%20case%E2%80%93control%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20ophthalmologica%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Sandvik,%20Gunhild%20Falleth&rft.date=2022-05&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=337&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=337-343&rft.issn=1755-375X&rft.eissn=1755-3768&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aos.14935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2545595881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-d7f19b2c72b5c830c9157fdce4f84845fcf90f5f6360f346196ea3233523a77a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2649290225&rft_id=info:pmid/34173343&rfr_iscdi=true