Vector-borne pathogens in clinically healthy military working dogs in eastern Austria

• Published in: Parasitology international 2021-10, Vol.84, p.102410-102410, Article 102410
• Main Authors: Sonnberger, Bernhard W., Graf, Barbara, Straubinger, Reinhard K., Rackl, Dietmar, Obwaller, Adelheid G., Peschke, Roman, Shahi Barogh, Bita, Joachim, Anja, Fuehrer, Hans-Peter
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Babesia canis; Borrelia burgdorferi; Canine vector-borne diseases; Dirofilaria repens; Military working dogs
• ISSN: 1383-5769; 1873-0329
• DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2021.102410

Military working dogs have an increased risk of acquiring an infection with vector-borne pathogens due to kennel housing and regular exposure to wildlife and vectors. To evaluate the level of infections in clinically healthy dogs of the Austrian Armed Forces, 94 individuals of the Military Working Dog Training Centre (MWDTC) Kaisersteinbruch/eastern Austria were examined in August 2016, February 2019 and August 2019. A modified Knott test was used to determine the presence of microfilariae, PCR for DNA detection of filarioid nematodes (incl. Dirofilaria), Leishmania spp., piroplasms, Borrelia spp., Bartonella spp. and Anaplasmataceae, and serological examination for antibodies against Borrelia burgdoferi s. l. and Leishmania infantum in all dogs. Two dogs were positive for Dirofilaria repens in the Knott test, and one of them also by PCR. Six clinically healthy dogs (4.2%) were positive for Babesia canis (PCR). In serology, 10 (10.6%) of the dogs were positive for specific antibodies against Borrelia burgdoferi s. l. The results suggest that the current measures against arthropod vector exposure and the pathogens they can transmit are not fully sufficient for these dogs. Further investigations of the tick and mosquito fauna in this area will shed more light on the risk of exposure for both the dogs and the staff of the MWDTC. •Military working dogs have an increased risk for vector-borne diseases due to their extensive life.•Dogs were positive for Dirofilaria repens, Babesia canis or Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato.•Dogs infected with Babesia canis showed no clinical signs.•Based on the medical history, autochthonous infections can be assumed.