Loading…

Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST

The early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce deaths through randomized, controlled trials. Numerous observational studies, failure analyses, and “incidence of death” studies have confirmed that screening reduces deaths in the general population. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) wh...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical imaging 2021-10, Vol.78, p.304-307
Main Author: Kopans, Daniel B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3
container_end_page 307
container_issue
container_start_page 304
container_title Clinical imaging
container_volume 78
creator Kopans, Daniel B.
description The early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce deaths through randomized, controlled trials. Numerous observational studies, failure analyses, and “incidence of death” studies have confirmed that screening reduces deaths in the general population. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) which collects mammographic images from different angles and uses them to synthesize planes through the breast is simply another advance in mammography among others that have been made over the years. DBT “absolutely” detects more cancers at a time when cure is more likely while also having the advantage of reducing recall rates. The Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) has been designed to compare DBT with 2-Dimensional Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM), but it's major design issues may provide misleading results. Instead of using a reduction in deaths as the endpoint, benefit in TMIST is predicated on a reduction in advanced cancers in the DBT group. This is a questionable “endpoint” (a reduction in advanced cancers is not necessary as proof of benefit). In addition, the trial may be underpowered so that even if DBT shows a benefit it may not be able to achieve “statistical significance”. The six CISNET models of the National Cancer Institute have shown that annual mammography beginning at the age of 40 will save the most lives. Yet TMIST will only include women ages 45 and over and will screen postmenopausal women every two years instead of annually. Consequently, TMIST results may be used, inappropriately, to limit access to breast cancer screening starting at the age of 45, and only offer biennial screening for post-menopausal women. •Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) uses projection images from different angles to permit the reconstruction of planes through the breast volume.•DBT reduces superimposed tissues which can mask a breast cancer on 2D Full Filed Digital Mammogrpahy so that it increase sensitivity•DBT eliminates the superimposition of normal tissue that can be misleading as “summation shadows” so it increases specificity•TMIST is likely underpowered because prevalence images can have no effect on reducing advanced cancers•The surrogate endpoint of reducing the rate of advanced cancers will not identify women whose lives are saved by detecting breast cancers at a smaller size within stages.•By not including women ages 40–44 and screening post-menopausal women every two years, TMIST may be use to falsely support delays in sc
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548601011</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0899707121002576</els_id><sourcerecordid>2560076110</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF1AkLhxI8Obhxw1UXpWKOFDOlnHWlaM0CXaKxL_HVeDChdNqV9-MdoaQc6AZUGDXTWZa17mt3mQ5zSGjLKMAB2QGghdpWUp5SGZUSJlyyuGYnITQ0CiUJZ-R9A6D23RXidsOLW6xG_Xo-rjrrk4GN1rdtiHpbbJ-Xr6uT8lRPAQ8-5lz8vZwv148pauXx-XidpWaghdjyqAUNb7TShiobMWEFQJsqUsLORa6qA2gtrysjJSmMJWudY66EpYXVkupizm5nHwH33_sMIxq64LBttUd9rug8qoUjMb0ENGLP2jT73wXv4sUo5QzABopNlHG9yF4tGrwsTH_pYCqfYuqUb8tqn2LijI12d9MQoxxPx16FYzDzmDtPJpR1b37z-IbBKR8hg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560076110</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kopans, Daniel B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopans, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><description>The early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce deaths through randomized, controlled trials. Numerous observational studies, failure analyses, and “incidence of death” studies have confirmed that screening reduces deaths in the general population. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) which collects mammographic images from different angles and uses them to synthesize planes through the breast is simply another advance in mammography among others that have been made over the years. DBT “absolutely” detects more cancers at a time when cure is more likely while also having the advantage of reducing recall rates. The Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) has been designed to compare DBT with 2-Dimensional Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM), but it's major design issues may provide misleading results. Instead of using a reduction in deaths as the endpoint, benefit in TMIST is predicated on a reduction in advanced cancers in the DBT group. This is a questionable “endpoint” (a reduction in advanced cancers is not necessary as proof of benefit). In addition, the trial may be underpowered so that even if DBT shows a benefit it may not be able to achieve “statistical significance”. The six CISNET models of the National Cancer Institute have shown that annual mammography beginning at the age of 40 will save the most lives. Yet TMIST will only include women ages 45 and over and will screen postmenopausal women every two years instead of annually. Consequently, TMIST results may be used, inappropriately, to limit access to breast cancer screening starting at the age of 45, and only offer biennial screening for post-menopausal women. •Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) uses projection images from different angles to permit the reconstruction of planes through the breast volume.•DBT reduces superimposed tissues which can mask a breast cancer on 2D Full Filed Digital Mammogrpahy so that it increase sensitivity•DBT eliminates the superimposition of normal tissue that can be misleading as “summation shadows” so it increases specificity•TMIST is likely underpowered because prevalence images can have no effect on reducing advanced cancers•The surrogate endpoint of reducing the rate of advanced cancers will not identify women whose lives are saved by detecting breast cancers at a smaller size within stages.•By not including women ages 40–44 and screening post-menopausal women every two years, TMIST may be use to falsely support delays in screening</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-7071</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Breast ; Breast cancer ; Cancer screening ; Digital imaging ; Failure analysis ; Fatalities ; Mammography ; Medical screening ; Menopause ; Mortality ; Post-menopause ; Reduction ; Screening ; Statistical analysis ; Women</subject><ispartof>Clinical imaging, 2021-10, Vol.78, p.304-307</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopans, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><title>Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST</title><title>Clinical imaging</title><description>The early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce deaths through randomized, controlled trials. Numerous observational studies, failure analyses, and “incidence of death” studies have confirmed that screening reduces deaths in the general population. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) which collects mammographic images from different angles and uses them to synthesize planes through the breast is simply another advance in mammography among others that have been made over the years. DBT “absolutely” detects more cancers at a time when cure is more likely while also having the advantage of reducing recall rates. The Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) has been designed to compare DBT with 2-Dimensional Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM), but it's major design issues may provide misleading results. Instead of using a reduction in deaths as the endpoint, benefit in TMIST is predicated on a reduction in advanced cancers in the DBT group. This is a questionable “endpoint” (a reduction in advanced cancers is not necessary as proof of benefit). In addition, the trial may be underpowered so that even if DBT shows a benefit it may not be able to achieve “statistical significance”. The six CISNET models of the National Cancer Institute have shown that annual mammography beginning at the age of 40 will save the most lives. Yet TMIST will only include women ages 45 and over and will screen postmenopausal women every two years instead of annually. Consequently, TMIST results may be used, inappropriately, to limit access to breast cancer screening starting at the age of 45, and only offer biennial screening for post-menopausal women. •Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) uses projection images from different angles to permit the reconstruction of planes through the breast volume.•DBT reduces superimposed tissues which can mask a breast cancer on 2D Full Filed Digital Mammogrpahy so that it increase sensitivity•DBT eliminates the superimposition of normal tissue that can be misleading as “summation shadows” so it increases specificity•TMIST is likely underpowered because prevalence images can have no effect on reducing advanced cancers•The surrogate endpoint of reducing the rate of advanced cancers will not identify women whose lives are saved by detecting breast cancers at a smaller size within stages.•By not including women ages 40–44 and screening post-menopausal women every two years, TMIST may be use to falsely support delays in screening</description><subject>Breast</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Digital imaging</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Fatalities</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Menopause</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Post-menopause</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0899-7071</issn><issn>1873-4499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwF1AkLhxI8Obhxw1UXpWKOFDOlnHWlaM0CXaKxL_HVeDChdNqV9-MdoaQc6AZUGDXTWZa17mt3mQ5zSGjLKMAB2QGghdpWUp5SGZUSJlyyuGYnITQ0CiUJZ-R9A6D23RXidsOLW6xG_Xo-rjrrk4GN1rdtiHpbbJ-Xr6uT8lRPAQ8-5lz8vZwv148pauXx-XidpWaghdjyqAUNb7TShiobMWEFQJsqUsLORa6qA2gtrysjJSmMJWudY66EpYXVkupizm5nHwH33_sMIxq64LBttUd9rug8qoUjMb0ENGLP2jT73wXv4sUo5QzABopNlHG9yF4tGrwsTH_pYCqfYuqUb8tqn2LijI12d9MQoxxPx16FYzDzmDtPJpR1b37z-IbBKR8hg</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Kopans, Daniel B.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST</title><author>Kopans, Daniel B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Breast</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Digital imaging</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Fatalities</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Menopause</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Post-menopause</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopans, Daniel B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopans, Daniel B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST</atitle><jtitle>Clinical imaging</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><spage>304</spage><epage>307</epage><pages>304-307</pages><issn>0899-7071</issn><eissn>1873-4499</eissn><abstract>The early detection of breast cancer has been shown to reduce deaths through randomized, controlled trials. Numerous observational studies, failure analyses, and “incidence of death” studies have confirmed that screening reduces deaths in the general population. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) which collects mammographic images from different angles and uses them to synthesize planes through the breast is simply another advance in mammography among others that have been made over the years. DBT “absolutely” detects more cancers at a time when cure is more likely while also having the advantage of reducing recall rates. The Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) has been designed to compare DBT with 2-Dimensional Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM), but it's major design issues may provide misleading results. Instead of using a reduction in deaths as the endpoint, benefit in TMIST is predicated on a reduction in advanced cancers in the DBT group. This is a questionable “endpoint” (a reduction in advanced cancers is not necessary as proof of benefit). In addition, the trial may be underpowered so that even if DBT shows a benefit it may not be able to achieve “statistical significance”. The six CISNET models of the National Cancer Institute have shown that annual mammography beginning at the age of 40 will save the most lives. Yet TMIST will only include women ages 45 and over and will screen postmenopausal women every two years instead of annually. Consequently, TMIST results may be used, inappropriately, to limit access to breast cancer screening starting at the age of 45, and only offer biennial screening for post-menopausal women. •Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) uses projection images from different angles to permit the reconstruction of planes through the breast volume.•DBT reduces superimposed tissues which can mask a breast cancer on 2D Full Filed Digital Mammogrpahy so that it increase sensitivity•DBT eliminates the superimposition of normal tissue that can be misleading as “summation shadows” so it increases specificity•TMIST is likely underpowered because prevalence images can have no effect on reducing advanced cancers•The surrogate endpoint of reducing the rate of advanced cancers will not identify women whose lives are saved by detecting breast cancers at a smaller size within stages.•By not including women ages 40–44 and screening post-menopausal women every two years, TMIST may be use to falsely support delays in screening</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.011</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0899-7071
ispartof Clinical imaging, 2021-10, Vol.78, p.304-307
issn 0899-7071
1873-4499
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2548601011
source Elsevier
subjects Breast
Breast cancer
Cancer screening
Digital imaging
Failure analysis
Fatalities
Mammography
Medical screening
Menopause
Mortality
Post-menopause
Reduction
Screening
Statistical analysis
Women
title Design, implementation, and pitfalls of TMIST
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A34%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design,%20implementation,%20and%20pitfalls%20of%20TMIST&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20imaging&rft.au=Kopans,%20Daniel%20B.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=78&rft.spage=304&rft.epage=307&rft.pages=304-307&rft.issn=0899-7071&rft.eissn=1873-4499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.06.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2560076110%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c373t-6148deb058c15f568f881f4a4f12e3a3dc1eaf745c99c3c5ada2ea58f73fa99a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560076110&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true