Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics: An Australian Cost-Benefit Study

• Published in: Heart, lung & circulation lung & circulation, 2022-02, Vol.31 (2), p.177-182
• Main Authors: Kozor, Rebecca, Mooney, John, Lowe, Harry, Kritharides, Leonard, Altman, Mikhail, Klimis, Harry, Thakkar, Jay, Wynne, Dylan, Thiagalingam, Aravinda, Figtree, Gemma A., Chow, Clara K.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Australia - epidemiology; Chest pain; Chest Pain - diagnosis; Chest Pain - epidemiology; Chest Pain - therapy; Clinic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Economic evaluation; Humans; Pain Clinics; Retrospective Studies
• ISSN: 1443-9506; 1444-2892
• DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2021.05.106

Chest pain is a large health care burden in Australia and around the world. Its management requires specialist assessment and diagnostic tests, which can be costly and often lead to unnecessary hospital admissions. There is a growing unmet clinical need to improve the efficiency and management of chest pain. This study aims to show the cost-benefit of rapid access chest pain clinics (RACC) as an alternative to hospital admission. Retrospective cost-benefit analysis for 12 months. RACCs in three Sydney tertiary referral hospitals. Cost per patient. Hospitals A, B and C implemented RACCs but each operating with slightly different staffing, referral patterns, and diagnostic services. All RACCs had similar costs per patient of AUD$455.25, AUD$427.12 and AUD$474.45, hospitals A, B and C respectively, and similar cost benefits per patient of AUD$1,168.75, AUD$1,196.88 and AUD$1,149.55, respectively. At least 28%, 26% and 29% of these RACC patients for hospitals A, B, and C, respectively, would have otherwise had to have been admitted to hospital for the model to be cost-beneficial. This study shows that a RACC model of care is cost-beneficial in the state of NSW as an alternative strategy to inpatient care for managing chest pain. Scaling up to a national level could represent an even larger benefit for the Australian health system.