Improvement in pain interference and function by an allied health pain management program: Results of a randomized trial

• Published in: European journal of pain 2021-11, Vol.25 (10), p.2226-2241
• Main Authors: Vandermost, Margaret, Bagraith, Karl S., Kennedy, Hannah, Doherty, Darren, Kilner, Simon, Sterling, Michele, Henry, David, Jones, Mark
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 1090-3801; 1532-2149
• DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1836

Background Chronic pain is a significant health problem worldwide and requires a biopsychosocial treatment approach. Access to traditional pain medicine specialist services is limited and innovative treatment models are required to support patients in tertiary care. The study evaluated the clinical effectiveness and safety of the Treatment Access Pathway (TAP), an allied health expanded scope model of care which included innovative group assessment and collaboration with patients to create individualized treatment plans. Methods One hundred and eighty‐one patients referred to a tertiary level chronic pain service were randomly allocated to either the TAP or the waitlist study groups. Primary (pain interference) and secondary outcome measures were collected at recruitment and again at 6 months. Per‐protocol analyses were utilized due to high participant attrition (46% across groups). Results The TAP group reported greater reductions in pain interference at 6 months than waitlist group (0.9, 95% CI: 0.2–1.6), with more than half of the TAP group (52%) reporting clinically significant improvement. In addition, statistically significant differences between the TAP and waitlist groups were observed for objective measurements of walking endurance (5.4 m, 95% CI: 1.7–9.1); and global impressions of change (1.4 unit decrease, 95% CI: 1–1.9). Nil adverse events were recorded. Conclusions The study suggests that an expanded scope allied health model of care prioritizing patient choice and group‐based interventions provides modest benefits for tertiary‐referral chronic pain patients. TAP warrants further investigation as a potentially viable alternative for tertiary healthcare where traditional pain services are unavailable or have long waiting lists. Significance The study tests effectiveness and safety of an expanded scope allied health‐led chronic pain program. Despite a high attrition rate, the study showed reduced pain interference and increased physical function in those who completed the protocol. The results are promising and support introduction of this model as an adjunct to existing traditional chronic pain models of care, with a particular focus on improving participant retention in the program. Additionally, the model of care can be used as a standalone chronic pain model of care where no other pain management resources are available. The study was registered on ANZCTR (Trial ID: ACTRN12617001284358).