A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts

We aimed to investigate the in vitro physiologic effects of xylene, chloroform, orange oil and eucalyptus oil solvents for dissolving gutta‐percha on L929 and HOB cell lines; 2.5 and 10 μL mL−1 of these solvents were tested for 24, 48 and 72 h. Gutta‐percha solvents inhibited the proliferation rate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Australian endodontic journal 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.569-579
Main Authors: Gundogan, Gul Ipek, Durmus, Sare, Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu, Kucukyesil, Nazmi, Acar, Yasin Talat, Balaban, Rumeysa, Kig, Cenk
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Acridine orange
Animals
Apoptosis
cell culture
Cell lines
Chloroform
Endodontics
Essential oils
Ethidium bromide
fibroblast
Fibroblasts
Gutta-Percha
gutta‐percha solvents
Humans
Mice
osteoblast
Osteoblasts
Root canals
Solvents
Xylene
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33
container_end_page 579
container_issue 3
container_start_page 569
container_title Australian endodontic journal
container_volume 47
creator Gundogan, Gul Ipek
Durmus, Sare
Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu
Kucukyesil, Nazmi
Acar, Yasin Talat
Balaban, Rumeysa
Kig, Cenk
description We aimed to investigate the in vitro physiologic effects of xylene, chloroform, orange oil and eucalyptus oil solvents for dissolving gutta‐percha on L929 and HOB cell lines; 2.5 and 10 μL mL−1 of these solvents were tested for 24, 48 and 72 h. Gutta‐percha solvents inhibited the proliferation rate of fibroblasts in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner; however, no inhibition was detected in HOB (evaluated using MTT assay). None of the solvents induced apoptosis/necrosis in HOB cells at ≤2.5 μL mL−1 concentration in contrast to L929 (determined using acridine orange/ethidium bromide dual staining). Each solvent tested reduced the migration rate of both L929 and HOB cell lines in a dose‐dependent manner (evaluated using a scratch assay). Gutta‐percha solvents can damage fibroblast‐rich tissues. Osteoblasts seemed to be more resistant to the tested solvents, and excessive extrusion of solvents from the root canal may also damage the periradicular tissues and reduce the ability to repair.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aej.12541
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2553235435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2553235435</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtu2zAQhomgQZ24XeQCAYFu0oVs8SVKSyNwmxQBuvGe4GMUy5BEh5RceNcj5Iw9SejYySJAuRly5sM_xIfQFclnJJ25hs2MUMHJGbogksuMcyk_pTujVUYqLifoMsZNnlPOJPmMJoxTWRaiuEDNAlvfbXXQQ7MDHIfR7bGv8bAGDHUNdoiH5-M4DPrf3-ctBLvWOPp2B_1h1OP12Oke-ziAN62Oqal7h7sxND3gujHh1P6CzmvdRvh6qlO0-rFc3d5lD79_3t8uHjLLBCNZXTmel4XlriwBiHGutEVV5sLURSVNzkumCa0KKI2hQjspDeeE2YoyR4CxKbo5xm6DfxohDqprooW21T34MSoqBKNM8LRsir59QDd-DH36nKJF8soElUWivh8pG3yMAWq1DU2nw16RXB30q6RfvepP7PUpcTQduHfyzXcC5kfgT9PC_v9JarH8dYx8AeEBj8E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2611135276</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Gundogan, Gul Ipek ; Durmus, Sare ; Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu ; Kucukyesil, Nazmi ; Acar, Yasin Talat ; Balaban, Rumeysa ; Kig, Cenk</creator><creatorcontrib>Gundogan, Gul Ipek ; Durmus, Sare ; Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu ; Kucukyesil, Nazmi ; Acar, Yasin Talat ; Balaban, Rumeysa ; Kig, Cenk</creatorcontrib><description>We aimed to investigate the in vitro physiologic effects of xylene, chloroform, orange oil and eucalyptus oil solvents for dissolving gutta‐percha on L929 and HOB cell lines; 2.5 and 10 μL mL−1 of these solvents were tested for 24, 48 and 72 h. Gutta‐percha solvents inhibited the proliferation rate of fibroblasts in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner; however, no inhibition was detected in HOB (evaluated using MTT assay). None of the solvents induced apoptosis/necrosis in HOB cells at ≤2.5 μL mL−1 concentration in contrast to L929 (determined using acridine orange/ethidium bromide dual staining). Each solvent tested reduced the migration rate of both L929 and HOB cell lines in a dose‐dependent manner (evaluated using a scratch assay). Gutta‐percha solvents can damage fibroblast‐rich tissues. Osteoblasts seemed to be more resistant to the tested solvents, and excessive extrusion of solvents from the root canal may also damage the periradicular tissues and reduce the ability to repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1329-1947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-4477</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aej.12541</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34278656</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acridine orange ; Animals ; Apoptosis ; cell culture ; Cell lines ; Chloroform ; Endodontics ; Essential oils ; Ethidium bromide ; fibroblast ; Fibroblasts ; Gutta-Percha ; gutta‐percha solvents ; Humans ; Mice ; osteoblast ; Osteoblasts ; Root canals ; Solvents ; Xylene</subject><ispartof>Australian endodontic journal, 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.569-579</ispartof><rights>2021 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc</rights><rights>2021 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 Australian Society of Endodontology Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9438-6113 ; 0000-0001-7710-7613 ; 0000-0002-1135-7967 ; 0000-0002-6318-5001 ; 0000-0001-7129-9394 ; 0000-0002-0997-7577 ; 0000-0001-9964-003X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34278656$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gundogan, Gul Ipek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durmus, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukyesil, Nazmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Yasin Talat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaban, Rumeysa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kig, Cenk</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts</title><title>Australian endodontic journal</title><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><description>We aimed to investigate the in vitro physiologic effects of xylene, chloroform, orange oil and eucalyptus oil solvents for dissolving gutta‐percha on L929 and HOB cell lines; 2.5 and 10 μL mL−1 of these solvents were tested for 24, 48 and 72 h. Gutta‐percha solvents inhibited the proliferation rate of fibroblasts in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner; however, no inhibition was detected in HOB (evaluated using MTT assay). None of the solvents induced apoptosis/necrosis in HOB cells at ≤2.5 μL mL−1 concentration in contrast to L929 (determined using acridine orange/ethidium bromide dual staining). Each solvent tested reduced the migration rate of both L929 and HOB cell lines in a dose‐dependent manner (evaluated using a scratch assay). Gutta‐percha solvents can damage fibroblast‐rich tissues. Osteoblasts seemed to be more resistant to the tested solvents, and excessive extrusion of solvents from the root canal may also damage the periradicular tissues and reduce the ability to repair.</description><subject>Acridine orange</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>cell culture</subject><subject>Cell lines</subject><subject>Chloroform</subject><subject>Endodontics</subject><subject>Essential oils</subject><subject>Ethidium bromide</subject><subject>fibroblast</subject><subject>Fibroblasts</subject><subject>Gutta-Percha</subject><subject>gutta‐percha solvents</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>osteoblast</subject><subject>Osteoblasts</subject><subject>Root canals</subject><subject>Solvents</subject><subject>Xylene</subject><issn>1329-1947</issn><issn>1747-4477</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtu2zAQhomgQZ24XeQCAYFu0oVs8SVKSyNwmxQBuvGe4GMUy5BEh5RceNcj5Iw9SejYySJAuRly5sM_xIfQFclnJJ25hs2MUMHJGbogksuMcyk_pTujVUYqLifoMsZNnlPOJPmMJoxTWRaiuEDNAlvfbXXQQ7MDHIfR7bGv8bAGDHUNdoiH5-M4DPrf3-ctBLvWOPp2B_1h1OP12Oke-ziAN62Oqal7h7sxND3gujHh1P6CzmvdRvh6qlO0-rFc3d5lD79_3t8uHjLLBCNZXTmel4XlriwBiHGutEVV5sLURSVNzkumCa0KKI2hQjspDeeE2YoyR4CxKbo5xm6DfxohDqprooW21T34MSoqBKNM8LRsir59QDd-DH36nKJF8soElUWivh8pG3yMAWq1DU2nw16RXB30q6RfvepP7PUpcTQduHfyzXcC5kfgT9PC_v9JarH8dYx8AeEBj8E</recordid><startdate>202112</startdate><enddate>202112</enddate><creator>Gundogan, Gul Ipek</creator><creator>Durmus, Sare</creator><creator>Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu</creator><creator>Kucukyesil, Nazmi</creator><creator>Acar, Yasin Talat</creator><creator>Balaban, Rumeysa</creator><creator>Kig, Cenk</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-6113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1135-7967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-5001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-9394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-7577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-003X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202112</creationdate><title>A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts</title><author>Gundogan, Gul Ipek ; Durmus, Sare ; Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu ; Kucukyesil, Nazmi ; Acar, Yasin Talat ; Balaban, Rumeysa ; Kig, Cenk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acridine orange</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>cell culture</topic><topic>Cell lines</topic><topic>Chloroform</topic><topic>Endodontics</topic><topic>Essential oils</topic><topic>Ethidium bromide</topic><topic>fibroblast</topic><topic>Fibroblasts</topic><topic>Gutta-Percha</topic><topic>gutta‐percha solvents</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>osteoblast</topic><topic>Osteoblasts</topic><topic>Root canals</topic><topic>Solvents</topic><topic>Xylene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gundogan, Gul Ipek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durmus, Sare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kucukyesil, Nazmi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acar, Yasin Talat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balaban, Rumeysa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kig, Cenk</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gundogan, Gul Ipek</au><au>Durmus, Sare</au><au>Ozturk, Gulgun Cansu</au><au>Kucukyesil, Nazmi</au><au>Acar, Yasin Talat</au><au>Balaban, Rumeysa</au><au>Kig, Cenk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts</atitle><jtitle>Australian endodontic journal</jtitle><addtitle>Aust Endod J</addtitle><date>2021-12</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>569</spage><epage>579</epage><pages>569-579</pages><issn>1329-1947</issn><eissn>1747-4477</eissn><abstract>We aimed to investigate the in vitro physiologic effects of xylene, chloroform, orange oil and eucalyptus oil solvents for dissolving gutta‐percha on L929 and HOB cell lines; 2.5 and 10 μL mL−1 of these solvents were tested for 24, 48 and 72 h. Gutta‐percha solvents inhibited the proliferation rate of fibroblasts in a dose‐ and time‐dependent manner; however, no inhibition was detected in HOB (evaluated using MTT assay). None of the solvents induced apoptosis/necrosis in HOB cells at ≤2.5 μL mL−1 concentration in contrast to L929 (determined using acridine orange/ethidium bromide dual staining). Each solvent tested reduced the migration rate of both L929 and HOB cell lines in a dose‐dependent manner (evaluated using a scratch assay). Gutta‐percha solvents can damage fibroblast‐rich tissues. Osteoblasts seemed to be more resistant to the tested solvents, and excessive extrusion of solvents from the root canal may also damage the periradicular tissues and reduce the ability to repair.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34278656</pmid><doi>10.1111/aej.12541</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-6113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7710-7613</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1135-7967</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6318-5001</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7129-9394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0997-7577</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9964-003X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1329-1947
ispartof Australian endodontic journal, 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.569-579
issn 1329-1947
1747-4477
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2553235435
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Acridine orange
Animals
Apoptosis
cell culture
Cell lines
Chloroform
Endodontics
Essential oils
Ethidium bromide
fibroblast
Fibroblasts
Gutta-Percha
gutta‐percha solvents
Humans
Mice
osteoblast
Osteoblasts
Root canals
Solvents
Xylene
title A comparative study of the effects of gutta‐percha solvents on human osteoblasts and murine fibroblasts
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T11%3A18%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20the%20effects%20of%20gutta%E2%80%90percha%20solvents%20on%20human%20osteoblasts%20and%20murine%20fibroblasts&rft.jtitle=Australian%20endodontic%20journal&rft.au=Gundogan,%20Gul%20Ipek&rft.date=2021-12&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=569&rft.epage=579&rft.pages=569-579&rft.issn=1329-1947&rft.eissn=1747-4477&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aej.12541&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553235435%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3531-f9d4086c4d88ee1bdd8c69805bf697b0483a1296e8bb25ad77b4413c923d1e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2611135276&rft_id=info:pmid/34278656&rfr_iscdi=true