Loading…

A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales

•The Euthymia Scale is a valid and comprehensive measure of euthymia.•The Resilience Scale is a valid measure of subjective ability to cope with stress.•The Positive Mental Health Scale is a valid measure of positive mental health.•These tools are highly sensitive patient-reported outcome measures....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of affective disorders 2021-11, Vol.294, p.71-76
Main Authors: Carrozzino, Danilo, Christensen, Kaj S., Mansueto, Giovanni, Brailovskaia, Julia, Margraf, Jürgen, Cosci, Fiammetta
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73
container_end_page 76
container_issue
container_start_page 71
container_title Journal of affective disorders
container_volume 294
creator Carrozzino, Danilo
Christensen, Kaj S.
Mansueto, Giovanni
Brailovskaia, Julia
Margraf, Jürgen
Cosci, Fiammetta
description •The Euthymia Scale is a valid and comprehensive measure of euthymia.•The Resilience Scale is a valid measure of subjective ability to cope with stress.•The Positive Mental Health Scale is a valid measure of positive mental health.•These tools are highly sensitive patient-reported outcome measures. Euthymia has been described as a transdiagnostic construct characterized by the absence of mood disturbances and the presence of an integration of psychic forces, such as coping strategy and well-being. A multidimensional measure, the Euthymia Scale (ES), has been proposed to assess it. We investigated construct and concurrent validity of the ES. Construct validity was studied via Rasch and Mokken analyses and compared with that of the 11-item Resilience Scale (RS-11) and 9-item Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-Scale). A total of 951 participants were recruited (77.5% women; 24.86 ± 5.62 years). The ES, RS and PMH demonstrated similar sensitivity and construct validity. Findings indicate minor needs for adjustments only. As expected the ES demonstrated a strong negative correlation with neuroticism. The convenience sample of subjects recruited primarily from female Italian university students and a community-based data collection limit the generalizability of the present findings. The cross-sectional design precludes the assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive and incremental validity. Only self-report measures and a Likert version of the ES were used. ES is the most comprehensive measure of euthymia. The RS-11 is a valid measure of a specific component of euthymia, namely subjective ability to cope with stress and empower well-being in face of life adversities. The PMH-Scale is a valid measure of overall positive mental health.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2553240511</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165032721006650</els_id><sourcerecordid>2553240511</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQRy0EEqXwAdg8MjTh7DRxIqYK8U-qxEJn6-pcFEdOUmy3Ur89KWVmuuW9n3SPsXsBqQBRPHZph3UqQYoUVAogLthM5CpLZC7UJZtNTJ5AJtU1uwmhA4CiUjBjmxU3zg62p-it4TigOwYb-Njw2BKnfWyPvcUF9xSsszQYWkxUzXdjsNEeiPc0RHS8JXSx5cGgo3DLrhp0ge7-7pxtXl--nt-T9efbx_NqnZisXMZkWUhUolRiuxW4LUuVmyrP5BKxaLKqBFkXgEblTUXSVCojMlmDZVVDXTcKVTZnD-fdnR-_9xSi7m0w5BwONO6DlvlpDnIhJlScUePHEDw1eudtj_6oBehTQt3pKaE-JdSg9JRwcp7ODk0_HCx5Hcxvgtp6MlHXo_3H_gEky3mE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2553240511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Carrozzino, Danilo ; Christensen, Kaj S. ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Brailovskaia, Julia ; Margraf, Jürgen ; Cosci, Fiammetta</creator><creatorcontrib>Carrozzino, Danilo ; Christensen, Kaj S. ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Brailovskaia, Julia ; Margraf, Jürgen ; Cosci, Fiammetta</creatorcontrib><description>•The Euthymia Scale is a valid and comprehensive measure of euthymia.•The Resilience Scale is a valid measure of subjective ability to cope with stress.•The Positive Mental Health Scale is a valid measure of positive mental health.•These tools are highly sensitive patient-reported outcome measures. Euthymia has been described as a transdiagnostic construct characterized by the absence of mood disturbances and the presence of an integration of psychic forces, such as coping strategy and well-being. A multidimensional measure, the Euthymia Scale (ES), has been proposed to assess it. We investigated construct and concurrent validity of the ES. Construct validity was studied via Rasch and Mokken analyses and compared with that of the 11-item Resilience Scale (RS-11) and 9-item Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-Scale). A total of 951 participants were recruited (77.5% women; 24.86 ± 5.62 years). The ES, RS and PMH demonstrated similar sensitivity and construct validity. Findings indicate minor needs for adjustments only. As expected the ES demonstrated a strong negative correlation with neuroticism. The convenience sample of subjects recruited primarily from female Italian university students and a community-based data collection limit the generalizability of the present findings. The cross-sectional design precludes the assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive and incremental validity. Only self-report measures and a Likert version of the ES were used. ES is the most comprehensive measure of euthymia. The RS-11 is a valid measure of a specific component of euthymia, namely subjective ability to cope with stress and empower well-being in face of life adversities. The PMH-Scale is a valid measure of overall positive mental health.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-0327</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2517</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Clinimetrics ; Euthymia ; Positive mental health ; Resilience ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Journal of affective disorders, 2021-11, Vol.294, p.71-76</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5207-7016 ; 0000-0001-7607-1305 ; 0000-0002-0409-2702 ; 0000-0002-5022-0488 ; 0000-0002-8164-8671</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carrozzino, Danilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansueto, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailovskaia, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margraf, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosci, Fiammetta</creatorcontrib><title>A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales</title><title>Journal of affective disorders</title><description>•The Euthymia Scale is a valid and comprehensive measure of euthymia.•The Resilience Scale is a valid measure of subjective ability to cope with stress.•The Positive Mental Health Scale is a valid measure of positive mental health.•These tools are highly sensitive patient-reported outcome measures. Euthymia has been described as a transdiagnostic construct characterized by the absence of mood disturbances and the presence of an integration of psychic forces, such as coping strategy and well-being. A multidimensional measure, the Euthymia Scale (ES), has been proposed to assess it. We investigated construct and concurrent validity of the ES. Construct validity was studied via Rasch and Mokken analyses and compared with that of the 11-item Resilience Scale (RS-11) and 9-item Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-Scale). A total of 951 participants were recruited (77.5% women; 24.86 ± 5.62 years). The ES, RS and PMH demonstrated similar sensitivity and construct validity. Findings indicate minor needs for adjustments only. As expected the ES demonstrated a strong negative correlation with neuroticism. The convenience sample of subjects recruited primarily from female Italian university students and a community-based data collection limit the generalizability of the present findings. The cross-sectional design precludes the assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive and incremental validity. Only self-report measures and a Likert version of the ES were used. ES is the most comprehensive measure of euthymia. The RS-11 is a valid measure of a specific component of euthymia, namely subjective ability to cope with stress and empower well-being in face of life adversities. The PMH-Scale is a valid measure of overall positive mental health.</description><subject>Clinimetrics</subject><subject>Euthymia</subject><subject>Positive mental health</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0165-0327</issn><issn>1573-2517</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kD9PwzAQRy0EEqXwAdg8MjTh7DRxIqYK8U-qxEJn6-pcFEdOUmy3Ur89KWVmuuW9n3SPsXsBqQBRPHZph3UqQYoUVAogLthM5CpLZC7UJZtNTJ5AJtU1uwmhA4CiUjBjmxU3zg62p-it4TigOwYb-Njw2BKnfWyPvcUF9xSsszQYWkxUzXdjsNEeiPc0RHS8JXSx5cGgo3DLrhp0ge7-7pxtXl--nt-T9efbx_NqnZisXMZkWUhUolRiuxW4LUuVmyrP5BKxaLKqBFkXgEblTUXSVCojMlmDZVVDXTcKVTZnD-fdnR-_9xSi7m0w5BwONO6DlvlpDnIhJlScUePHEDw1eudtj_6oBehTQt3pKaE-JdSg9JRwcp7ODk0_HCx5Hcxvgtp6MlHXo_3H_gEky3mE</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Carrozzino, Danilo</creator><creator>Christensen, Kaj S.</creator><creator>Mansueto, Giovanni</creator><creator>Brailovskaia, Julia</creator><creator>Margraf, Jürgen</creator><creator>Cosci, Fiammetta</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-7016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-1305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-2702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-0488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-8671</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales</title><author>Carrozzino, Danilo ; Christensen, Kaj S. ; Mansueto, Giovanni ; Brailovskaia, Julia ; Margraf, Jürgen ; Cosci, Fiammetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Clinimetrics</topic><topic>Euthymia</topic><topic>Positive mental health</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carrozzino, Danilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Kaj S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mansueto, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brailovskaia, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Margraf, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosci, Fiammetta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carrozzino, Danilo</au><au>Christensen, Kaj S.</au><au>Mansueto, Giovanni</au><au>Brailovskaia, Julia</au><au>Margraf, Jürgen</au><au>Cosci, Fiammetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales</atitle><jtitle>Journal of affective disorders</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>294</volume><spage>71</spage><epage>76</epage><pages>71-76</pages><issn>0165-0327</issn><eissn>1573-2517</eissn><abstract>•The Euthymia Scale is a valid and comprehensive measure of euthymia.•The Resilience Scale is a valid measure of subjective ability to cope with stress.•The Positive Mental Health Scale is a valid measure of positive mental health.•These tools are highly sensitive patient-reported outcome measures. Euthymia has been described as a transdiagnostic construct characterized by the absence of mood disturbances and the presence of an integration of psychic forces, such as coping strategy and well-being. A multidimensional measure, the Euthymia Scale (ES), has been proposed to assess it. We investigated construct and concurrent validity of the ES. Construct validity was studied via Rasch and Mokken analyses and compared with that of the 11-item Resilience Scale (RS-11) and 9-item Positive Mental Health Scale (PMH-Scale). A total of 951 participants were recruited (77.5% women; 24.86 ± 5.62 years). The ES, RS and PMH demonstrated similar sensitivity and construct validity. Findings indicate minor needs for adjustments only. As expected the ES demonstrated a strong negative correlation with neuroticism. The convenience sample of subjects recruited primarily from female Italian university students and a community-based data collection limit the generalizability of the present findings. The cross-sectional design precludes the assessment of test-retest reliability, predictive and incremental validity. Only self-report measures and a Likert version of the ES were used. ES is the most comprehensive measure of euthymia. The RS-11 is a valid measure of a specific component of euthymia, namely subjective ability to cope with stress and empower well-being in face of life adversities. The PMH-Scale is a valid measure of overall positive mental health.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.001</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-7016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7607-1305</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-2702</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5022-0488</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8164-8671</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-0327
ispartof Journal of affective disorders, 2021-11, Vol.294, p.71-76
issn 0165-0327
1573-2517
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2553240511
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Clinimetrics
Euthymia
Positive mental health
Resilience
Validity
title A clinimetric analysis of the euthymia, resilience, and positive mental health scales
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A33%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20clinimetric%20analysis%20of%20the%20euthymia,%20resilience,%20and%20positive%20mental%20health%20scales&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20affective%20disorders&rft.au=Carrozzino,%20Danilo&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=294&rft.spage=71&rft.epage=76&rft.pages=71-76&rft.issn=0165-0327&rft.eissn=1573-2517&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2553240511%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-462a71871bb1ab8875c95324aa6f39802d60ac75f9e2c973eec3fa89d0ddf7a73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2553240511&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true