Loading…

Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)

Objectives To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreduct...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BJU international 2022-06, Vol.129 (6), p.699-707
Main Authors: Buelens, Sarah, Poelaert, Filip, Claeys, Tom, De Bleser, Elise, Dhondt, Bert, Verla, Wesley, Ost, Piet, Rappe, Bernard, De Troyer, Bart, Verbaeys, Caroline, Kimpe, Bart, Billiet, Ignace, Plancke, Hendrik, Fransis, Karen, Willemen, Patrick, Ameye, Filip, Decaestecker, Karel, Lumen, Nicolaas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863
container_end_page 707
container_issue 6
container_start_page 699
container_title BJU international
container_volume 129
creator Buelens, Sarah
Poelaert, Filip
Claeys, Tom
De Bleser, Elise
Dhondt, Bert
Verla, Wesley
Ost, Piet
Rappe, Bernard
De Troyer, Bart
Verbaeys, Caroline
Kimpe, Bart
Billiet, Ignace
Plancke, Hendrik
Fransis, Karen
Willemen, Patrick
Ameye, Filip
Decaestecker, Karel
Lumen, Nicolaas
description Objectives To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy was offered to all fit patients with resectable tumours, resulting in 40 patients. Standard of care was administered to 40 patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was castration resistant cancer‐free survival at the time point of ≥50% events. The secondary endpoint was local event‐free survival. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity‐score analysis were applied. Results After a median (quartiles) follow‐up of 35 (24–47) months, 42 patients became castration‐resistant or died. The median castration resistant cancer‐free survival was 53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–92) vs 21 (95% CI 15–27) months for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.017). The 3‐year estimates for local event‐free survival were 83% (95% CI 71–95) vs 59% (95% CI 51–67) for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.012). However, treatment group showed no significance in the multivariable models for castration resistant cancer‐free survival (P = 0.5) or local event‐free survival (P = 0.3), adjusted for propensity‐score analysis. Complications were similar to the non‐metastatic setting. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, with lower baseline prostate‐specific antigen levels, alkaline phosphatase levels and metastatic burden. Conclusion The present LoMP study was unable to show a difference between the two inclusion groups regarding castration resistant cancer‐free survival for asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. These results validate previous evidence that, in well‐selected and informed patients, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is feasible and safe, with corresponding continence rates compared to the non‐metastatic, high‐risk setting. Whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy could be a valuable option to achieve good local palliation needs to be further researched. Overall, the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy needs to be further explored in randomized studies to correct for potential bias.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.15553
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2554354091</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554354091</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlYX_gEJuGnBafOYpJOlFp-06MKCCyFkMhmYMo86SZT-e2OndSF4N_eSfOdw7wHgHKMxDjVJV36MGWP0APRxzOMoxujtcD8jwXvgxNoVQuGBs2PQozFJBKG4D94XvnSFNrVrzRVct41dG-2KTwOt89kGNjUsG61KGP6VqwIHmxxWxinrVBBuJWEyUKtamxYO583ipROPTsFRrkprznZ9AJZ3t6-zh2j-fP84u55HmjJKI004yZJUpwpTLEysKEOaYyQIxlmu0iQJx2GdZ0IIwmmuszRjAueMTFPCE04HYNj5hmU-vLFOVoXVpixVbRpvJWEspiwEgQN6-QddNb6tw3aS8CmKBWdbw1FH6XCdbU0u121RqXYjMZI_kcsQudxGHtiLnaNPK5P9kvuMAzDpgK-iNJv_neTN07Kz_AZrIooe</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2670496586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Buelens, Sarah ; Poelaert, Filip ; Claeys, Tom ; De Bleser, Elise ; Dhondt, Bert ; Verla, Wesley ; Ost, Piet ; Rappe, Bernard ; De Troyer, Bart ; Verbaeys, Caroline ; Kimpe, Bart ; Billiet, Ignace ; Plancke, Hendrik ; Fransis, Karen ; Willemen, Patrick ; Ameye, Filip ; Decaestecker, Karel ; Lumen, Nicolaas</creator><creatorcontrib>Buelens, Sarah ; Poelaert, Filip ; Claeys, Tom ; De Bleser, Elise ; Dhondt, Bert ; Verla, Wesley ; Ost, Piet ; Rappe, Bernard ; De Troyer, Bart ; Verbaeys, Caroline ; Kimpe, Bart ; Billiet, Ignace ; Plancke, Hendrik ; Fransis, Karen ; Willemen, Patrick ; Ameye, Filip ; Decaestecker, Karel ; Lumen, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy was offered to all fit patients with resectable tumours, resulting in 40 patients. Standard of care was administered to 40 patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was castration resistant cancer‐free survival at the time point of ≥50% events. The secondary endpoint was local event‐free survival. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity‐score analysis were applied. Results After a median (quartiles) follow‐up of 35 (24–47) months, 42 patients became castration‐resistant or died. The median castration resistant cancer‐free survival was 53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–92) vs 21 (95% CI 15–27) months for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.017). The 3‐year estimates for local event‐free survival were 83% (95% CI 71–95) vs 59% (95% CI 51–67) for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.012). However, treatment group showed no significance in the multivariable models for castration resistant cancer‐free survival (P = 0.5) or local event‐free survival (P = 0.3), adjusted for propensity‐score analysis. Complications were similar to the non‐metastatic setting. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, with lower baseline prostate‐specific antigen levels, alkaline phosphatase levels and metastatic burden. Conclusion The present LoMP study was unable to show a difference between the two inclusion groups regarding castration resistant cancer‐free survival for asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. These results validate previous evidence that, in well‐selected and informed patients, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is feasible and safe, with corresponding continence rates compared to the non‐metastatic, high‐risk setting. Whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy could be a valuable option to achieve good local palliation needs to be further researched. Overall, the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy needs to be further explored in randomized studies to correct for potential bias.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.15553</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34289231</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Alkaline phosphatase ; Asymptomatic ; Cancer surgery ; Castration ; cytoreduction ; hormone‐naïve ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; newly diagnosed ; Palliation ; Patients ; PCSM ; progression‐free survival ; Prostate cancer ; ProstateCancer ; Prostatectomy ; prostatic neoplasms ; Standard of care ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tumors ; Urological surgery</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2022-06, Vol.129 (6), p.699-707</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International</rights><rights>2021 The Authors BJU International © 2021 BJU International.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2022 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1242-3644 ; 0000-0001-7223-7670 ; 0000-0002-5713-1744 ; 0000-0002-1752-6821 ; 0000-0002-2203-4848 ; 0000-0002-2213-6211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34289231$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buelens, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poelaert, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claeys, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bleser, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhondt, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verla, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappe, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Troyer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaeys, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimpe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billiet, Ignace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plancke, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fransis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameye, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decaestecker, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumen, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><title>Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy was offered to all fit patients with resectable tumours, resulting in 40 patients. Standard of care was administered to 40 patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was castration resistant cancer‐free survival at the time point of ≥50% events. The secondary endpoint was local event‐free survival. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity‐score analysis were applied. Results After a median (quartiles) follow‐up of 35 (24–47) months, 42 patients became castration‐resistant or died. The median castration resistant cancer‐free survival was 53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–92) vs 21 (95% CI 15–27) months for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.017). The 3‐year estimates for local event‐free survival were 83% (95% CI 71–95) vs 59% (95% CI 51–67) for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.012). However, treatment group showed no significance in the multivariable models for castration resistant cancer‐free survival (P = 0.5) or local event‐free survival (P = 0.3), adjusted for propensity‐score analysis. Complications were similar to the non‐metastatic setting. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, with lower baseline prostate‐specific antigen levels, alkaline phosphatase levels and metastatic burden. Conclusion The present LoMP study was unable to show a difference between the two inclusion groups regarding castration resistant cancer‐free survival for asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. These results validate previous evidence that, in well‐selected and informed patients, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is feasible and safe, with corresponding continence rates compared to the non‐metastatic, high‐risk setting. Whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy could be a valuable option to achieve good local palliation needs to be further researched. Overall, the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy needs to be further explored in randomized studies to correct for potential bias.</description><subject>Alkaline phosphatase</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Castration</subject><subject>cytoreduction</subject><subject>hormone‐naïve</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>newly diagnosed</subject><subject>Palliation</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>PCSM</subject><subject>progression‐free survival</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>ProstateCancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>prostatic neoplasms</subject><subject>Standard of care</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMotlYX_gEJuGnBafOYpJOlFp-06MKCCyFkMhmYMo86SZT-e2OndSF4N_eSfOdw7wHgHKMxDjVJV36MGWP0APRxzOMoxujtcD8jwXvgxNoVQuGBs2PQozFJBKG4D94XvnSFNrVrzRVct41dG-2KTwOt89kGNjUsG61KGP6VqwIHmxxWxinrVBBuJWEyUKtamxYO583ipROPTsFRrkprznZ9AJZ3t6-zh2j-fP84u55HmjJKI004yZJUpwpTLEysKEOaYyQIxlmu0iQJx2GdZ0IIwmmuszRjAueMTFPCE04HYNj5hmU-vLFOVoXVpixVbRpvJWEspiwEgQN6-QddNb6tw3aS8CmKBWdbw1FH6XCdbU0u121RqXYjMZI_kcsQudxGHtiLnaNPK5P9kvuMAzDpgK-iNJv_neTN07Kz_AZrIooe</recordid><startdate>202206</startdate><enddate>202206</enddate><creator>Buelens, Sarah</creator><creator>Poelaert, Filip</creator><creator>Claeys, Tom</creator><creator>De Bleser, Elise</creator><creator>Dhondt, Bert</creator><creator>Verla, Wesley</creator><creator>Ost, Piet</creator><creator>Rappe, Bernard</creator><creator>De Troyer, Bart</creator><creator>Verbaeys, Caroline</creator><creator>Kimpe, Bart</creator><creator>Billiet, Ignace</creator><creator>Plancke, Hendrik</creator><creator>Fransis, Karen</creator><creator>Willemen, Patrick</creator><creator>Ameye, Filip</creator><creator>Decaestecker, Karel</creator><creator>Lumen, Nicolaas</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-3644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-7670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-1744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-6821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-4848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-6211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202206</creationdate><title>Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)</title><author>Buelens, Sarah ; Poelaert, Filip ; Claeys, Tom ; De Bleser, Elise ; Dhondt, Bert ; Verla, Wesley ; Ost, Piet ; Rappe, Bernard ; De Troyer, Bart ; Verbaeys, Caroline ; Kimpe, Bart ; Billiet, Ignace ; Plancke, Hendrik ; Fransis, Karen ; Willemen, Patrick ; Ameye, Filip ; Decaestecker, Karel ; Lumen, Nicolaas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Alkaline phosphatase</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Castration</topic><topic>cytoreduction</topic><topic>hormone‐naïve</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>newly diagnosed</topic><topic>Palliation</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>PCSM</topic><topic>progression‐free survival</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>ProstateCancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>prostatic neoplasms</topic><topic>Standard of care</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buelens, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poelaert, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Claeys, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Bleser, Elise</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dhondt, Bert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verla, Wesley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ost, Piet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappe, Bernard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Troyer, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbaeys, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimpe, Bart</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Billiet, Ignace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Plancke, Hendrik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fransis, Karen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemen, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ameye, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Decaestecker, Karel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lumen, Nicolaas</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buelens, Sarah</au><au>Poelaert, Filip</au><au>Claeys, Tom</au><au>De Bleser, Elise</au><au>Dhondt, Bert</au><au>Verla, Wesley</au><au>Ost, Piet</au><au>Rappe, Bernard</au><au>De Troyer, Bart</au><au>Verbaeys, Caroline</au><au>Kimpe, Bart</au><au>Billiet, Ignace</au><au>Plancke, Hendrik</au><au>Fransis, Karen</au><au>Willemen, Patrick</au><au>Ameye, Filip</au><au>Decaestecker, Karel</au><au>Lumen, Nicolaas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2022-06</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>129</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>699</spage><epage>707</epage><pages>699-707</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives To investigate the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy in addition to standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Materials and Methods This multicentre, prospective study included asymptomatic patients from 2014 to 2018 (NCT02138721). Cytoreductive radical prostatectomy was offered to all fit patients with resectable tumours, resulting in 40 patients. Standard of care was administered to 40 patients who were ineligible or unwilling to undergo surgery. The primary endpoint was castration resistant cancer‐free survival at the time point of ≥50% events. The secondary endpoint was local event‐free survival. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses with propensity‐score analysis were applied. Results After a median (quartiles) follow‐up of 35 (24–47) months, 42 patients became castration‐resistant or died. The median castration resistant cancer‐free survival was 53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 14–92) vs 21 (95% CI 15–27) months for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.017). The 3‐year estimates for local event‐free survival were 83% (95% CI 71–95) vs 59% (95% CI 51–67) for cytoreductive radical prostatectomy compared to standard of care (P = 0.012). However, treatment group showed no significance in the multivariable models for castration resistant cancer‐free survival (P = 0.5) or local event‐free survival (P = 0.3), adjusted for propensity‐score analysis. Complications were similar to the non‐metastatic setting. Patients undergoing surgery were younger, with lower baseline prostate‐specific antigen levels, alkaline phosphatase levels and metastatic burden. Conclusion The present LoMP study was unable to show a difference between the two inclusion groups regarding castration resistant cancer‐free survival for asymptomatic patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. These results validate previous evidence that, in well‐selected and informed patients, cytoreductive radical prostatectomy is feasible and safe, with corresponding continence rates compared to the non‐metastatic, high‐risk setting. Whether cytoreductive radical prostatectomy could be a valuable option to achieve good local palliation needs to be further researched. Overall, the role of cytoreductive radical prostatectomy needs to be further explored in randomized studies to correct for potential bias.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>34289231</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.15553</doi><tpages>707</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1242-3644</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7223-7670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5713-1744</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1752-6821</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2203-4848</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-6211</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2022-06, Vol.129 (6), p.699-707
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2554354091
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Alkaline phosphatase
Asymptomatic
Cancer surgery
Castration
cytoreduction
hormone‐naïve
Metastases
Metastasis
newly diagnosed
Palliation
Patients
PCSM
progression‐free survival
Prostate cancer
ProstateCancer
Prostatectomy
prostatic neoplasms
Standard of care
Surgery
Survival
Tumors
Urological surgery
title Multicentre, prospective study on local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer (LoMP study)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T13%3A36%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicentre,%20prospective%20study%20on%20local%20treatment%20of%20metastatic%20prostate%20cancer%20(LoMP%20study)&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Buelens,%20Sarah&rft.date=2022-06&rft.volume=129&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=699&rft.epage=707&rft.pages=699-707&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.15553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2554354091%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-c262d8bcba1319e4a350c6109211dfab881551cfd999263fcdbd591f527b26863%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2670496586&rft_id=info:pmid/34289231&rfr_iscdi=true